EXAMINE ETHICAL PERSPECTIVES
Required Reading
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/sam-harris/in-defense-of-torture_b_8993.html
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=129780844
http://www.npr.org/templates/transcript/transcript.php?storyId=5512634
https://www.ted.com/talks/michael_sandel_what_s_the_right_thing_to_do
http://www.bbc.co.uk/ethics/introduction/duty_1.shtml#h
http://writingcenter.unc.edu/handouts/revising-drafts/
https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/
Rubric
The Rubric is used to evaluate your Project. Satisfying all of the Rubric criteria shows that you have mastered the project and the relevant competencies.
|
Criteria |
Mastery? |
|
Final draft identifies topic's ethical issues |
Yes Not Yet |
|
Final draft accurately describes the relevant philosophical traditions |
Yes Not Yet |
|
Final draft applies the relevant philosophies to the issue of torture |
Yes Not Yet |
|
Final draft provides relevant evidence for why each philosopher would support one position or the other |
Yes Not Yet |
|
Final draft identifies possible flaws in ethical arguments |
Yes Not Yet |
|
Organizer summarizes the relevant information from the provided resources |
Yes Not Yet |
|
Rough and final drafts show significant editing and improvements; Organizer writing comments show effective self-critiquing process |
Yes Not Yet |
|
Writing in the Organizer and Final Draft of Article is clear, with no major errors |
Yes Not Yet |
|
Any sources of information are cited using APA format, with no major errors |
Yes Not Yet |