|
|
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
|
2
Less than Satisfactory
74.00%
|
3
Satisfactory
79.00%
|
4
Good
87.00%
|
5
Excellent
100.00%
|
|
70.0 %Content
|
|
|
10.0 %Current Role of Culture
|
A description of the current role of culture within the organization is not included.
|
A description of the current role of culture within the organization is minimally included and lacks detail.
|
A description of the current role of culture within the organization is minimally included.
|
An appropriate description of the current role of culture within the organization is included.
|
An exemplary description of the current role of culture within the organization is included.
|
|
|
10.0 %Current Successful Cultural Components
|
A description of the current cultural components that enable successful innovation is not included.
|
A description of the current cultural components that enable successful innovation is minimally included and lacks detail.
|
A description of the current cultural components that enable successful innovation is minimally included.
|
An appropriate description of the current cultural components that enable successful innovation is included.
|
An exemplary description of the current cultural components that enable successful innovation is included.
|
|
|
10.0 %Current Cultural Components Requiring Redesigning
|
A description of the current cultural components requiring redesigning for a successful innovation implementation is not included.
|
A description of the current cultural components requiring redesigning for a successful innovation implementation is minimally included and lacks detail.
|
A description of the current cultural components requiring redesigning for a successful innovation implementation is minimally included.
|
An appropriate description of the current cultural components requiring redesigning for a successful innovation implementation is included.
|
An exemplary description of the current cultural components requiring redesigning for a successful innovation implementation is not included.
|
|
|
20.0 %Strategies to Strengthen Innovation Culture
|
Strategies to strengthen the innovation culture are not included.
|
Strategies to strengthen the innovation culture are included, but lack substantial detail.
|
Strategies to strengthen the innovation culture are minimally included.
|
Strategies to strengthen the innovation culture are appropriately included.
|
Exemplary strategies to strengthen the innovation culture are included.
|
|
|
10.0 %Innovative Structure Communication
|
Communication strategies for implementing an innovative structure within the organization are not included or described.
|
Communication strategies for implementing an innovative structure within the organization are included, but lack substantial detail in the description.
|
Communication strategies for implementing an innovative structure within the organization are minimally included and described.
|
Communication strategies for implementing an innovative structure within the organization are appropriately included and described.
|
Exemplary communication strategies for implementing an innovative structure within the organization are included and described.
|
|
|
10.0 %Building Capacity
|
A description of how capacity is built for innovative thinking is not included.
|
A description of how capacity is built for innovative thinking is included, but lacks substantial detail.
|
A description of how capacity is built for innovative thinking is minimally included.
|
A description of how capacity is built for innovative thinking is adequately included.
|
An exemplary description of how capacity is built for innovative thinking is included.
|
|
|
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
|
|
|
7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose
|
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
|
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.
|
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
|
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
|
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
|
|
|
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
|
|
|
8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction
|
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
|
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
|
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
|
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.
|
Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
|
|
|
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
|
|
|
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
|
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.
|
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.
|
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.
|
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.
|
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
|
|
|
10.0 %Format
|
|
|
5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
|
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
|
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.
|
Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
|
Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
|
All format elements are correct.
|
|
|
5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)
|
Sources are not documented.
|
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
|
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
|
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
|
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
|
|
|
100 %Total Weightage
|
|
|