Nyanya Only please for my homework.

Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic/organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.

Points: 360 Assignment 4: Fraud Prevention and Detection Plan

Criteria Unacceptable

Below 70% F

Fair

70-79% C

Proficient

80-89% B

Exemplary

90-100% A 1. Evaluate the key elements that should be included in the plan, including a justification as to how the element is likely to protect corporate assets and minimize risk based on your research.

Weight: 10%

Did not submit or incompletely evaluated the key elements that should be included in the plan, including a justification as to how the element is likely to protect corporate assets and minimize risk based on your research.

Partially evaluated the key elements that should be included in the plan, including a justification as to how the element is likely to protect corporate assets and minimize risk based on your research.

Satisfactorily evaluated the key elements that should be included in the plan, including a justification as to how the element is likely to protect corporate assets and minimize risk based on your research.

Thoroughly evaluated the key elements that should be included in the plan, including a justification as to how the element is likely to protect corporate assets and minimize risk based on your research.

2. Create an argument to be presented to the senior leadership in support of a fraud prevention and detection plan, indicating the consequences of failure to implement the plan. Provide support for your argument. Weight: 10%

Did not submit or incompletely created an argument to be presented to the senior leadership in support of a fraud prevention and detection plan, indicating the consequences of failure to implement the plan. Did not submit or incompletely provided support for your argument.

Partially created an argument to be presented to the senior leadership in support of a fraud prevention and detection plan, indicating the consequences of failure to implement the plan. Partially provided support for your argument.

Satisfactorily created an argument to be presented to the senior leadership in support of a fraud prevention and detection plan, indicating the consequences of failure to implement the plan. Satisfactorily provided support for your argument.

Thoroughly created an argument to be presented to the senior leadership in support of a fraud prevention and detection plan, indicating the consequences of failure to implement the plan. Thoroughly provided support for your argument.

3. Create an approach to identify the roles and responsibilities of key personnel in the organization, indicating the significance of each role in the fraud prevention and detection equation. Provide support for your rationale.

Weight: 10%

Did not submit or incompletely created an approach to identify the roles and responsibilities of key personnel in the organization, indicating the significance of each role in the fraud prevention and detection equation. Did not submit or incompletely provided support for your rationale.

Partially created an approach to identify the roles and responsibilities of key personnel in the organization, indicating the significance of each role in the fraud prevention and detection equation. Partially provided support for your rationale.

Satisfactorily created an approach to identify the roles and responsibilities of key personnel in the organization, indicating the significance of each role in the fraud prevention and detection equation. Satisfactorily provided support for your rationale.

Thoroughly created an approach to identify the roles and responsibilities of key personnel in the organization, indicating the significance of each role in the fraud prevention and detection equation. Thoroughly provided support for your rationale.

4. Compare the roles of management, internal auditors, external auditors, governing bodies, and the board of directors, and assess how each can contribute to your fraud prevention and detection plan.

Did not submit or incompletely compared the roles of management, internal auditors, external auditors, governing bodies, and the board of directors, and assessed how each

Partially compared the roles of management, internal auditors, external auditors, governing bodies, and the board of directors, and assessed how each can contribute to

Satisfactorily compared the roles of management, internal auditors, external auditors, governing bodies, and the board of directors, and assessed how each can contribute to

Thoroughly compared the roles of management, internal auditors, external auditors, governing bodies, and the board of directors, and assessed how each can contribute to

Page 1 of 2

6/3/2017https://blackboard.strayer.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/ACC/578/1132/Week10-1132/Week...

Weight: 10% can contribute to your fraud prevention and detection plan.

your fraud prevention and detection plan.

your fraud prevention and detection plan.

your fraud prevention and detection plan.

5. Evaluate the tools that you would propose to use to make your plan more effective in mitigating or eliminating fraud and how you would justify the risk / reward ratio of each tool recommended.

Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely evaluated the tools that you would propose to use to make your plan more effective in mitigating or eliminating fraud and how you would justify the risk / reward ratio of each tool recommended.

Partially evaluated the tools that you would propose to use to make your plan more effective in mitigating or eliminating fraud and how you would justify the risk / reward ratio of each tool recommended.

Satisfactorily evaluated the tools that you would propose to use to make your plan more effective in mitigating or eliminating fraud and how you would justify the risk / reward ratio of each tool recommended.

Thoroughly evaluated the tools that you would propose to use to make your plan more effective in mitigating or eliminating fraud and how you would justify the risk / reward ratio of each tool recommended.

6. Prepare a fraud prevention and detection plan based on your findings, indicating how you would communicate the plan to employees throughout the organization.

Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely prepared a fraud prevention and detection plan based on your findings, indicating how you would communicate the plan to employees throughout the organization.

Partially prepared a fraud prevention and detection plan based on your findings, indicating how you would communicate the plan to employees throughout the organization.

Satisfactorily prepared a fraud prevention and detection plan based on your findings, indicating how you would communicate the plan to employees throughout the organization.

Thoroughly prepared a fraud prevention and detection plan based on your findings, indicating how you would communicate the plan to employees throughout the organization.

7. Predict the future occurrences of corporate fraud and the likelihood that it will be detected by regulatory agencies based on your research. Provide support for your rationale.

Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely predicted the future occurrences of corporate fraud and the likelihood that it will be detected by regulatory agencies based on your research. Did not submit or incompletely provided support for your rationale.

Partially predicted the future occurrences of corporate fraud and the likelihood that it will be detected by regulatory agencies based on your research. Partially provided support for your rationale.

Satisfactorily predicted the future occurrences of corporate fraud and the likelihood that it will be detected by regulatory agencies based on your research. Satisfactorily provided support for your rationale.

Thoroughly predicted the future occurrences of corporate fraud and the likelihood that it will be detected by regulatory agencies based on your research. Thoroughly provided support for your rationale.

8. 3 references

Weight: 5%

No references provided

Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices.

Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.

Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.

9. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements

Weight: 10%

More than 6 errors present

5-6 errors present 3-4 errors present 0-2 errors present

Page 2 of 2

6/3/2017https://blackboard.strayer.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/ACC/578/1132/Week10-1132/Week...