q.docx

read my two essay and answer the each questions.(Political science)

Please read my 2essay, and answer the each question.

I wrote an essay and my professor gave me a comment. so please answer the question.

i need few sentence.

100 words or more

discussion : Is economic development a "fundamental human right?" If so, should this "right" be enforceable under international law? So, where do you stand, with the poor countries or the rich? If economic development is a fundamental human right, then efforts by interest groups in the rich countries to prevent the "outsourcing of jobs" and to erect protectionist barriers to trade might be construed as violation of fundamental human rights. Post your response in either "The Rich" thread or "The Poor"

My discussion answer A : The Rich

Due to the numbers of the universal declarations made on the impact of economic development on human rights, it is, therefore, in line to indeed accept that economic development is a fundamental human right of which at least most states in the world want to achieve. In most cases, the developed countries are perceived by the developing countries as economically developed. Hence their citizens are comfortable, but the developed states have continued to engage in businesses as well as other economic activities to best improve their economy. As a result of these struggles by the rich states to further improve their economy whereas the poor countries being innovative to look for aids and other economic platforms explain indeed that economic development is a fundamental human right. A country being economically developed is in a position to equip its citizens with human security at all sectors, for example, the United States provides better housing to its citizens than DRC, and the reason is that the US is economically developed than DRC (Max- Neff al et, 1992). Such countries like DRC will look for the opportunities to improve their economy because failures of economic development in developing countries have triggered civil wars since the governments cannot provide for their citizens' basic needs.

The developed world has good economies objected most of the declarations that indeed affirm that economic developed is a fundamental human right. For example, The Declaration of Vienna Human Rights Conference, because these countries have better economies compared to the developing world and hardly do they suffer from the impact of failure in the economic development and incase of any failure, is detected then mitigation mechanisms are always in position. But most of the poor countries have often suffered the side effects of failure in economy development, and that is why most of them rely on aids and donations from the rich countries so that they can invest in their economic institutions that will trigger economic development in the long run (Scully, 1988). The struggles and innovations that these emerging countries go through can best explain economic develop as a fundamental human right and not merely as a goal as explained by most of the rich countries that their economies can support their human security. Some countries perceived to be rich have engaged with the poor countries in economic activities that have indicated inequalities, as well as international bodies like IMF, have put some conditions that negatively affect the emerging countries when participating world market. For example, high tariffs and other harsh conditions these have made most of the poor countries not to participate equally as the wealthy nations. Such relationships object the fact that these rich states term economic development as a goal rather than a fundamental human right.

As much as the rich countries still clinch on the fact that economic development is not a fundamental human right but just a goal, we have witnessed in most developing countries civil wars resulting from poor economic development, for instance, in the DRC were one of the causes of the prolonged civil wars is the resource. The country has extensive resources, but the citizens cannot benefit from the minerals; these have continued fuelling conflicts. Indeed objecting that economic development is a fundamental human right is like giving a blind eye to such cases of resource- based conflicts.

My professor's comments : To what extent is the failure of some poor countries to develop the fault of rich, imperialist countries?

My answer : I wrote an essay and my professor gave me a comment. so please answer the question.

My discussion answer B : The Poor

The society always tries to argue out the fact that economic development and human rights are two completely different aspects. This argument, however, is only bound to hold true if people perceive human rights to be legal obligations (Spiegel, 2014). Human rights in my view, are entirely related to economic development. There is a need to examine the two synergies in our modern society and more so, emphasize the need to consider human rights while imposing economic development concepts in the society. The gap between the rich and the have-not is increasing at an alarming rate in the community. This needs to be eliminated through advocating for equality.

The poor believe economic development is a human right, contrary to the wealthy. However, I believe that if individuals get to understand that human rights are essential to the maintenance of socioeconomic goals, they will then work towards the realization of these distinct rights and obligations in the society. Economic policies are not neutral per se. Rights and responsibilities which are so desired are part of the capital, and evidently, economic growth, accumulation of capital and development sustainability are all dependent on human rights concepts. Human rights are bound to bring members of the society together and increase cohesion as well as social integration.

Reassuring the society of the encouragement of human rights is a huge step in economic development. When individuals are denied their rights and freedom in the community, this is often bound to result in social instability, conflicts and different consequences in the economy. Organizations which aim at economic development need to ensure that all their investment initiatives and policies avoid being termed as unproductive. Fulfilment of human rights is a sure way of enhancing the productivity of assets. Human rights form one of the most important foundations for economic development and performance.

Human rights are also an integral part of the legal framework which makes up subsidies and quotas. There is a very strong relationship between human rights and economic development. This can be viewed by a real economic framework and its comparison to a normative economic framework. Violation of human rights is a primary cause of poverty in the society. Alleviation of poverty in the community helps uphold human rights. Denying individuals human rights has significant consequences in the community especially since these determine the optimal levels of allocation of resources, effectiveness in development as well as any form of comparative advantage in the society.

Development in the modern world is no longer regarded as a separate aspect regarding human betterment. Every development activity needs to be part of an approach aimed at unifying individuals in the community (Levine, 2013). Values of economic and social development need to be upheld, and human rights should be seen as more than just responsibilities under the legal framework. Healthy relationships need to be established, active development needs to be upheld, and human rights above everything else, should not be at any point shunned. The ultimate goal should be to enhance equality.

My professor's comments : How can these rights be enforced?

My answer : I wrote an essay and my professor gave me a comment. so please answer the question.