Educational philosophy paper
EDUC 604
Educational Philosophy Paper Grading Rubric
|
Concepts |
|||||
|
Standard |
Descriptor |
Advanced |
Proficient |
Developing |
Points Earned |
|
INT-A1 |
Introduction/Thesis Statement 10 points |
A well constructed introduction presents a clear thesis statement that conveys a personal philosophy of education and is strongly aligned with the title and body of the paper. |
A clear thesis statement is introduced, conveys a personal philosophy of education, and aligns with the title and body of the paper. |
The thesis statement is poorly introduced, vaguely stated, or does not align with the title and/or body of the paper. |
|
|
INT-A1 |
Abstract 10 points |
Abstract provides effective summation of overall arguments contained in the paper body. |
Abstract exists but does not provide effective summation of overall arguments contained in the paper body. |
Abstract is vague and does not convey a personal philosophy of education. |
|
|
INT-A1 |
Worldview and Philosophy of Life 30 points |
All of the issues of meaning/purpose, truth, and values are presented coherently and lay a foundation for a consistent philosophy of education. |
Most issues of meaning/purpose, truth, and values are all presented coherently and lay a foundation for a philosophy of education. |
Few of the issues of meaning/purpose, truth, and values are presented and/or are inconsistent with the philosophy of education. |
|
|
INT-A1 INT-C12 |
Philosophy of Schools/Learning 30 points |
Beliefs about schools and the learning process strongly align with worldview, are consistent with methodology, and are conveyed in light of professional knowledge in the field. |
Beliefs about schools and the learning process loosely align with worldview and methodology, and are conveyed in light of professional knowledge in the field. |
Beliefs about schools and the learning process do NOT align with worldview and methodology, and/or are NOT conveyed in light of professional knowledge in the field. |
|
|
INT-A1 INT-C12 |
Instructional Practice/Methodology 30 points |
Thoroughly describes an exceptional instructional practice/teaching model, explaining the purpose/vision for why it will be implemented. |
Describes a basic instructional practice/teaching model, explaining the purpose/vision for why it will be implemented. |
Instructional philosophy/teaching model is vague and/or does not explain the purpose for implementation. |
|
|
INT-A1 INT-C11 |
Teacher–Learner Relationships 10 points |
Clearly outlines beliefs on effective teacher/learner relationships; strongly aligned with philosophy and practice. |
Outlines beliefs on effective teacher/learner relationships; loosely aligned with philosophy and practice. |
Poor description of teacher/learner relationships and/or loosely aligned with philosophy and practice. |
|
|
INT-A1 INT-C11 |
Diversity 10 points |
Addresses clearly and integrates effectively the consideration of diversity in the overall philosophical argument. |
Addresses the consideration of diversity in the overall philosophical argument but does not effectively integrate into the overall philosophical argument. |
Diversity issues receive cursory attention. |
|
|
Composition and Critical Thinking |
|||||
|
Standard |
Descriptor |
Advanced |
Proficient |
Developing |
Points Earned |
|
INT-B3 |
Mechanics 12 points |
No errors in spelling, grammar, or punctuation. |
Three or fewer errors in spelling, grammar, or punctuation. |
More than 3 errors in spelling, grammar, or punctuation. |
|
|
INT-B3 |
Composition 16 points |
All of the following aspects are presented with exceptional quality: coherent, cohesive, sentence and paragraph structures. |
Most of the following aspects are presented with acceptable quality: coherent, cohesive, sentence and paragraph structures. |
Few of the following aspects are presented with acceptable quality: coherent, cohesive, sentence and paragraph structures. |
|
|
INT-B3 |
Critical Thinking 12 points |
All the following qualities are present: supports claims with evidence; critically evaluates claims of others; seriously considers/engages with other interpretations
|
Most of the following qualities are present: supports claims with evidence; critically evaluates claims of others; seriously considers/engages with other interpretations |
Few of the following qualities are present: supports claims with evidence; critically evaluates claims of others; seriously considers/engages with other interpretations |
|
|
Information Literacy / APA |
|||||
|
Standard |
Descriptor |
Advanced |
Proficient |
Developing |
Points Earned |
|
INT-A1 INT-B3 |
Citation Appropriateness 10 points |
Exceptional understanding of existing body of knowledge on the topic. Appropriately compares own ideas to those of experts in the field. |
Basic understanding of existing body of knowledge on the topic. Compares own ideas to those of experts in the field. |
Weak or poor understanding of existing body of knowledge on the topic. Inappropriately compares or fails to compare own ideas to those of experts in the field. |
|
|
INT-A1 INT-B3 |
Citation Format 4 points |
All citations are in text and are correctly formatted using APA style guidelines. |
Less than 3 instances of incorrect citations as according to APA style guidelines. |
Three or more instances of incorrect citations as according to APA style guidelines. |
|
|
INT-A1 INT-B3 |
Reference Appropriateness 12 points |
Six references are listed from legitimate sources in the field of educational theory, philosophy, or research. All of the following are represented: book, academic journal, online source. |
Five or six references are listed from legitimate sources in the field of educational theory, philosophy, or research. At least 2 of the following are represented: book, academic journal, online source. |
Fewer than five references are listed and/or are from questionable sources in the field of educational theory, philosophy, or research. One or none of the following are represented: book, academic journal, online source. |
|
|
INT-A1 INT-B3 |
Reference Format 4 points |
Bibliographic references are correctly formatted using APA style guidelines. |
Less than 3 instances of incorrect bibliographic references as according to APA style guidelines. |
Three or more instances of incorrect bibliographic references as according to APA style guidelines. |
|
Total Points Earned:
Instructor’s Comments:
<Page 1 of 2>