Bus520 Assign#2. Please refer to attachment for Instructions.
smith014
assign2_grading_rubric.docxGrading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.
|
Points: 220 |
Assignment 2: Using Motivation to Improve Performance |
|||
|
Criteria |
Unacceptable Below 70% F |
Fair 70-79% C |
Proficient 80-89% B |
Exemplary 90-100% A |
|
1. Create a one (1) page outline in which you select topics and subtopics around your recommendations to improve the employee’s involvement. Weight: 20% |
Did not submit or incompletely created a one (1) page outline in which you select topics and subtopics around your recommendations to improve the employee’s involvement. |
Partially created a one (1) page outline in which you select topics and subtopics around your recommendations to improve the employee’s involvement. |
Satisfactorily created a one (1) page outline in which you select topics and subtopics around your recommendations to improve the employee’s involvement. |
Thoroughly created a one (1) page outline in which you select topics and subtopics around your recommendations to improve the employee’s involvement. |
|
2. Explain three (3) of the most critical topics you have included in your outline, and propose a potential course of implementation. (3-4 pages) Weight: 55% |
Did not submit or incompletely explained three (3) of the most critical topics you have included in your outline, and did not submit or incompletely proposed a potential course of implementation. (3-4 pages) |
Partially explained three (3) of the most critical topics you have included in your outline, and Partially proposed a potential course of implementation. (3-4 pages) |
Satisfactorily explained three (3) of the most critical topics you have included in your outline, and satisfactorily proposed a potential course of implementation. (3-4 pages) |
Thoroughly explained three (3) of the most critical topics you have included in your outline, and thoroughly proposed a potential course of implementation. (3-4 pages) |
|
3. 2 references Weight: 10% |
No references provided. |
Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices. |
Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices. |
Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices. |
|
4. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements Weight: 15% |
More than 6 errors present |
5-6 errors present |
3-4 errors present |
0-2 errors present |
