For Michael Smith ONLY Assignment 3

profileamybeth1976
rubric_assignment_3_due_june_2.xlsx

Sheet1

Unacceptable Below 70% F Fair 70-79% C Proficient 80-89% B Exemplary 90-100% A
HSA501-A2-1 Points Range:0 (0%) - 34.98 (17.49%) Points Range:35 (17.5%) - 39.98 (19.99%) Points Range:40 (20%) - 44.98 (22.49%) Points Range:45 (22.5%) - 50 (25%)
1. Classify five (5) measurements of quality of care in a hospital, and justify the major reasons why you believe these measurements matter to patients in their process of choosing a hospital for emergency or inpatient care. Weight: 25% Did not submit or incompletely classified five (5) measurements of quality of care in a hospital, and did not submit or incompletely justified the major reasons why you believe these measurements matter to patients in their process of choosing a hospital for emergency or inpatient care. Partially classified five (5) measurements of quality of care in a hospital, and partially justified the major reasons why you believe these measurements matter to patients in their process of choosing a hospital for emergency or inpatient care. Satisfactorily classified five (5) measurements of quality of care in a hospital, and satisfactorily justified the major reasons why you believe these measurements matter to patients in their process of choosing a hospital for emergency or inpatient care. Thoroughly classified five (5) measurements of quality of care in a hospital, and thoroughly justified the major reasons why you believe these measurements matter to patients in their process of choosing a hospital for emergency or inpatient care.
HSA501-A2-2 Points Range:0 (0%) - 34.98 (17.49%) Points Range:35 (17.5%) - 39.98 (19.99%) Points Range:40 (20%) - 44.98 (22.49%) Points Range:45 (22.5%) - 50 (25%)
2. Specify four (4) main features in health care organizations that can be used to design a successful quality improvement plan. Articulate the significant manner in which the specified features can lead to failure or success of quality of care in Sunlight Hospital. Weight: 25% Did not submit or incompletely specified four (4) main features in health care organizations that can be used to design a successful quality improvement plan. Did not submit or incompletely articulated the significant manner in which the specified features can lead to failure or success of quality of care in Sunlight Hospital. Partially specified four (4) main features in health care organizations that can be used to design a successful quality improvement plan. Partially articulated the significant manner in which the specified features can lead to failure or success of quality of care in Sunlight Hospital. Satisfactorily specified four (4) main features in health care organizations that can be used to design a successful quality improvement plan. Satisfactorily articulated the significant manner in which the specified features can lead to failure or success of quality of care in Sunlight Hospital. Thoroughly specified four (4) main features in health care organizations that can be used to design a successful quality improvement plan. Thoroughly articulated the significant manner in which the specified features can lead to failure or success of quality of care in Sunlight Hospital.
HSA501-A2-3 Points Range:0 (0%) - 34.98 (17.49%) Points Range:35 (17.5%) - 39.98 (19.99%) Points Range:40 (20%) - 44.98 (22.49%) Points Range:45 (22.5%) - 50 (25%)
3. Suggest the salient reasons why quality of care would add value to and create a competitive advantage for the Sunlight Hospital. Justify your response. Weight: 25% Did not submit or incompletely suggested the salient reasons why quality of care would add value to and create a competitive advantage for the Sunlight Hospital. Did not submit or incompletely justified your response. Partially suggested the salient reasons why quality of care would add value to and create a competitive advantage for the Sunlight Hospital. Partially justified your response. Satisfactorily suggested the salient reasons why quality of care would add value to and create a competitive advantage for the Sunlight Hospital. Satisfactorily justified your response. Thoroughly suggested the salient reasons why quality of care would add value to and create a competitive advantage for the Sunlight Hospital. Thoroughly justified your response.
HSA501-A2-4 Points Range:0 (0%) - 6.98 (3.49%) Points Range:7 (3.5%) - 7.98 (3.99%) Points Range:8 (4%) - 8.98 (4.49%) Points Range:9 (4.5%) - 10 (5%)
4. 4 recent (i.e., last five [5] years) references Weight: 5% No references provided Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices. Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices. Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.
HSA501-A2-5 Points Range:0 (0%) - 6.98 (3.49%) Points Range:7 (3.5%) - 7.98 (3.99%) Points Range:8 (4%) - 8.98 (4.49%) Points Range:9 (4.5%) - 10 (5%)
5. Writing Mechanics, Grammar, and Formatting Weight: 5% Serious and persistent errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting. Partially free of errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting. Mostly free of errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting. Error free or almost error free grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.
HSA501-A2-6 Points Range:0 (0%) - 6.98 (3.49%) Points Range:7 (3.5%) - 7.98 (3.99%) Points Range:8 (4%) - 8.98 (4.49%) Points Range:9 (4.5%) - 10 (5%)
6. Appropriate use of APA in-text citations and reference section Weight: 5% Lack of in-text citations and / or lack of reference section. In-text citations and references are provided, but they are only partially formatted correctly in APA style. Most in-text citations and references are provided, and they are generally formatted correctly in APA style. In-text citations and references are error free or almost error free and consistently formatted correctly in APA style.
HSA501-A2-7 Points Range:0 (0%) - 6.98 (3.49%) Points Range:7 (3.5%) - 7.98 (3.99%) Points Range:8 (4%) - 8.98 (4.49%) Points Range:9 (4.5%) - 10 (5%)
7. Information Literacy / Integration of Sources Weight: 5% Serious errors in the integration of sources, such as intentional or accidental plagiarism, or failure to use in-text citations. Sources are partially integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing. Sources are mostly integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing. Sources are consistently integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing.
HSA501-A2-8 Points Range:0 (0%) - 6.98 (3.49%) Points Range:7 (3.5%) - 7.98 (3.99%) Points Range:8 (4%) - 8.98 (4.49%) Points Range:9 (4.5%) - 10 (5%)
8. Clarity and Coherence of Writing Weight: 5% Information is confusing to the reader and fails to include reasons and evidence that logically support ideas. Information is partially clear with minimal reasons and evidence that logically support ideas. Information is mostly clear and generally supported with reasons and evidence that logically support ideas. Information is provided in a clear, coherent, and consistent manner with reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.

Sheet2

Sheet3