Wendy Lewis Only!!!
2/23/2017
1
Consequences Matter— Utilitarianism Chapter 3
Learning Objectives
After reading this chapter, you will be able to:
3.1 Define “Utilitarianism” and understand the moral choices and consequences of this philosophy as they apply to real life.
3.2 Articulate the relation of general happiness to Utilitarian arguments according to Bentham and Mill.
3.3 Critically analyze whether and how one might distinguish between one happiness and another.
3.4 Discuss Utilitarianism as it may apply to contemporary moral questions.
Teleological Theories
Focus on the consequences of actions.
Right actions are equated with those that produce things of value.
2/23/2017
2
Utilitarianism
Utilitarianism - an act is good if it maximizes the greatest amount
of good.
An act is right if and only if no other act available to the moral
agent maximizes utility more than the act decided upon.
Utilitarianism
Utilitarianism - an act is good if it maximizes the greatest amount of good, pleasure, or utility.
Bentham - greatest overall Quantity. The hedonic calculus can be
used to evaluate potential pleasure.
Mill - Quality will lead to quantity of pleasure. Higher pleasures are
better than lower pleasures.
Bentham claims that:
"Nature has placed mankind under two sovereign masters, pain
and pleasure. It is for them alone to point out what we ought to do,
as well as determine what we shall do"
2/23/2017
3
Principle of Utility
By the principle of utility he means, "that principle which
approves and disapproves of every action whatsoever,
according to the tendency which it appears to have to
augment or diminish happiness".
Hedonic Calculus
Acts of pleasure-
Intensity
Duration
Certainty
Propinquity - (nearness)
Consequences -
Fecundity - the chances that it will be followed by more of the same,
Purity - the chances that the pleasure will not be followed by pain
Extent - the number of people it affects
Quality over Quantity
"It is better to be Socrates dissatisfied than a fool satisfied...It is
better to be a human being dissatisfied than a pig satisfied."
2/23/2017
4
Higher vs. Lower Pleasures
“If one of the two [pleasures] is, by those who are competently
acquainted with both, placed so far above the other that they…
would not resign it for any quantity of the other pleasure which their
nature is capable of, we are justified in ascribing to the preferred
enjoyment a superiority in quality, so far outweighing quantity as to
render it, in comparison, of small account.”
Mill Claims:
Mill claims that the Hedonic calculus is impossible because the
nature of pain and pleasure are such that no meaningful standard
can be established to weigh one pleasure against one pain.
He thinks that QUALITY pleasures will lead to a greater quantity of
pleasure.
Utilitarianism is not Egoism
"The happiness which forms the utilitarian standard of what is right
conduct, is not the agent’s own happiness, but that of all
concerned..." In this way, the rightness or wrongness of an act is not
based upon the consequences of pain and pleasure for yourself,
but also those consequences for others.