Powerpoint Presentation - Strategic HRM

profilelikmdsmurl
management_program_powerpoint_presentation_rubric.docx

1 of 2

Management Program

PowerPoint Presentation Rubric

Presenter (s) ___________________________________

Preparation (80%)

9-10

7-8

5-6

0-4

Grading Scheme

Percentage

Organization

(25%)

Student presents information in logical, interesting sequence which audience can follow.

Student presents information in logical sequence which audience can follow.

Audience has difficulty following presentation because student jumps around.

Audience cannot understand presentation because there is no sequence of information.

Content

(40%)

Content reflects a high level of critical thinking; data is accurate and strongly supports the analysis/conclusion. Content was obtained from a variety of relevant resources and was properly cited. All issues are fully addressed. Presentation contained excellent examples which were linked to objective.

Content is well thought out, data is relevant and supports conclusions; reflects critical thinking and several relevant sources of data are used and are properly cited. All issues are included in the presentation and good examples were linked to objective.

Content reflects minimal depth with little application of critical thinking; minimal relevant data sources are used and minimal citations are used. Some issues are omitted and there were few relevant examples or the examples were not well explained.

Content provides no apparent application of critical thinking; has weak or erroneous facts or misinterpretation; data does not support conclusions. Several issues are omitted. Few relevant data sources used and there was poor citation. There were no or too few examples or examples were difficult to grasp or did not apply directly to the objective.

Grammar/

Mechanics

(15%)

Presentation has no misspellings or grammatical errors.

Presentation has no more than two misspellings and/or grammatical errors.

Presentation has three misspellings and/or grammatical errors.

Presentation has four or more spelling errors and or grammatical errors.

Delivery (20%)

9-10

7-8

5-6

0-4

Grading Scheme

Percentage

Use of PowerPoint

(20%)

PowerPoint presentation is professional and enhances the presentation.

PowerPoint presentation is professional based on the grade level.

PowerPoint presentation does not meet expectations.

Poor quality of the PowerPoint presentation distracts from the presentation.

Total Points:

Fall 2010

1

of 2

Fall 2010

Management Program

PowerPoint

Presentation Rubric

Present

e

r (s) ___________________________________

Preparation (

80

%)

9

-

10

7

-

8

5

-

6

0

-

4

Grading

Scheme

Percentage

Organization

(

25

%)

Student presents

information in logical,

interesting sequence

which

audience can

follow.

Student presents

information in logical

sequence which

audience can follow.

Audience has difficulty

following presentation

because student jumps

around.

Audience cannot

understand presentation

because there is no

sequence of informatio

n.

Content

(

4

0

%)

Content reflects a high

level of critical thinking;

data is accurate and

strongly supports the

analysis/conclusion.

Content was obtained

from a variety of relevant

resources and was

properly cited. All issues

are fully addressed.

Presentation contained

excellent examples which

were linked to objective.

Content is well thought

out, data is relevant

and supports

conclusions; reflects

critical thinking and

several relevant

sources of data are

used and are properly

cited. All issues a

re

included in the

presentation and good

examples were linked

to objective.

Content reflects minimal

depth with little

application of critical

thinking; minimal relevant

data sources are used

and minimal citations are

used. Some issues are

omitted and

the

re were

few relevant examples o

r

the examples were not

well explained.

Content provides no

apparent application of

critical thinking; has weak

or erroneous facts or

misinterpretation; data

does not support

conclusions. Several

issues are omitted. Few

relevant data sources

used and there was poor

citation.

There were no or

too

few e

xamples

or

examples

were difficult to

grasp or did not apply

directly to the objective.

Grammar/

Mechanics

(1

5

%)

Presentation has no

misspellings or

grammatical errors.

Presentation has no

more than two

misspellings and/or

grammatical errors.

Presentation has three

misspellings and/or

grammatical errors.

Presentation has four or

more spelling errors and

or grammatical errors.

1 of 2

Fall 2010

Management Program

PowerPoint Presentation Rubric

Presenter (s) ___________________________________

Preparation (80%)

9-10 7-8 5-6 0-4

Grading

Scheme

Percentage

Organization

(25%)

Student presents

information in logical,

interesting sequence

which audience can

follow.

Student presents

information in logical

sequence which

audience can follow.

Audience has difficulty

following presentation

because student jumps

around.

Audience cannot

understand presentation

because there is no

sequence of information.

Content

(40%)

Content reflects a high

level of critical thinking;

data is accurate and

strongly supports the

analysis/conclusion.

Content was obtained

from a variety of relevant

resources and was

properly cited. All issues

are fully addressed.

Presentation contained

excellent examples which

were linked to objective.

Content is well thought

out, data is relevant

and supports

conclusions; reflects

critical thinking and

several relevant

sources of data are

used and are properly

cited. All issues are

included in the

presentation and good

examples were linked

to objective.

Content reflects minimal

depth with little

application of critical

thinking; minimal relevant

data sources are used

and minimal citations are

used. Some issues are

omitted and there were

few relevant examples or

the examples were not

well explained.

Content provides no

apparent application of

critical thinking; has weak

or erroneous facts or

misinterpretation; data

does not support

conclusions. Several

issues are omitted. Few

relevant data sources

used and there was poor

citation. There were no or

too few examples or

examples were difficult to

grasp or did not apply

directly to the objective.

Grammar/

Mechanics

(15%)

Presentation has no

misspellings or

grammatical errors.

Presentation has no

more than two

misspellings and/or

grammatical errors.

Presentation has three

misspellings and/or

grammatical errors.

Presentation has four or

more spelling errors and

or grammatical errors.