ethics case study powerpoint

Print

Ethics Case Study Scoring Guide

Due Date: End of Unit 6. 

Percentage of Course Grade: 15%.

Criteria 

Evaluate the efficacy of a professional ethical standard in relation to a particular ethical concern.

16%

Non performance 

Does not describe how a professional ethical standard applies to a particular ethical concern.

Basic 

Describes how a professional ethical standard applies to a particular ethical concern.

Proficient 

Evaluates the efficacy of a professional ethical standard in relation to a particular ethical concern.

 

Distinguished 

Develops and applies clear criteria for evaluating the efficacy of a professional ethical standard in relation to particular ethical concerns.

Criteria 

Apply steps in an ethical decision-making model to an ethical dilemma.16%

Non performance 

Does not apply steps in an ethical decision-making model to an ethical dilemma.

Basic 

Applies steps in an ethical decision-making model to an ethical dilemma but some steps are missing.

Proficient 

Applies steps in an ethical decision-making model to an ethical dilemma.

Distinguished 

Applies steps in an ethical decision-making model to an ethical dilemma and includes notes justifying choices between alternatives.

Criteria 

Justify why a particular ethical reasoning model is most appropriate in resolving an ethical dilemma.

17%

Non performance 

Does not provide reasons why a particular ethical reasoning model is most appropriate in resolving an ethical dilemma.

Basic 

Provides some reasons why a particular ethical reasoning model is most appropriate in resolving an ethical dilemma.

Proficient 

Justifies why a particular ethical reasoning model is most appropriate in resolving an ethical dilemma.

Distinguished 

Develops and applies clear criteria for evaluating why a particular ethical reasoning model is most appropriate in resolving an ethical dilemma.

Design a viable solution for an ethical problem.17%

Non performance 

Does not design a viable solution for an ethical problem.

Basic 

Designs a solution for an ethical problem but elements are incomplete or not viable.

Proficient 

Designs a viable solution for an ethical problem.

Distinguished 

Designs a viable solution for an ethical problem and supports with clear justification for each point.

Criteria  

Write clearly, with correct spelling, grammar, syntax, and good organization, following APA guidelines.

17%

Non performance 

Does not write clearly, and there are errors in spelling, grammar, syntax, organization, and compliance with APA guidelines.

Basic 

Writes clearly overall, but there are some errors in spelling, grammar, syntax, organization, or compliance with APA guidelines

Proficient 

Writes clearly, with correct spelling, grammar, syntax, and good organization, following APA guidelines.

Distinguished 

Writes concisely with excellent clarity and organization, with no errors in spelling, grammar, or syntax, following APA guidelines, and employing critical or analytical reasoning as needed.

Criteria 

Convey information in a presentation format that is readable and well organized.17%

Non performance

Does not convey information in a presentation format.

Basic 

Conveys information in a presentation format with errors that detract from the message.

Proficient 

Conveys information in a presentation format that is readable and well organized.

Distinguished 

Conveys information in a presentation format that is readable, effective, and well organized, using principles of visual design to add special vividness, authority, or appeal to the message without distracting from it.