Annotated
Written Communication – MLA Annotated Bibliography Grading Rubric Author: Reviewer:
|
|
Beginning (D/F-range) |
Developing (C-range) |
Accomplished (B-range) |
Exemplary (A-range) |
|
Fair & Accurate Source Summaries |
First sentence fails to include author, title, or the article’s thesis. Summaries are missing, inaccurate, or contain opinion. |
First sentence does not properly identify author, title, or thesis. Summaries fail to include sufficient information to be comprehensible. Unnecessary details are included. |
First sentence states author and title, but thesis wording needs tightening. Summaries include enough information to be understood, but the reader is left with unanswered questions.
|
First sentence clearly states author, title, and thesis. Summaries provide the reader with a clear understanding of the original sources. Summaries also demonstrate understanding of the texts’ ideas, arguments, and evidence. |
|
Clarity & Conciseness
|
Several sentences lack clarity and paraphrasing needs to be improved. |
Some sentences lack clarity and paraphrasing could be improved. |
Ideas are paraphrased well and presented clearly, but could be expressed in fewer words.
|
Writer uses own words to clearly and concisely express points presented in the original sources.
|
|
MLA Documentation
|
Signal phrases are lacking. Passages are plagiarized. Works Cited entries are missing or have several errors.
|
Signal phrases are repetitious and/or contain flaws. More accurate summary verb choice and/or tense needed (See blue handout). Minor errors in Works Cited entries. |
Signal phrases used, but a greater variety and/or number are needed (See blue handout). Works Cited entries are properly formatted. |
A variety of signal phrases in MLA format are incorporated throughout the each summary. Properly formatted Works Cited entries. |
|
Appropriate and Credible Sources Located & Evaluated
|
1 or more of the required sources is missing or not appropriate for topic focus. 4 or more sources are not evaluated for authority. Relationship of sources not explained. |
10 sources are included, but 3 or more do not state the authors’ credentials and/or explain the relevance the of source. |
10 ABCDE Sources Sources are included & appropriate for topic focus. Credentials indicating sources’ authority are missing in 1 or 2 entries. |
10 ABCDE Sources (5 Web & 5 Database) are included and appropriate for topic focus. Sources are current, the authors’ credentials are provided, and relation to other sources in bibliography is explained. |
|
Grammar, Punctuation & Sentence Structure
|
7 or more grammar, punctuation, and/or mechanical errors. Stop by the Writing Center (Rm A2000P) |
4-6 grammar, punctuation and/or mechanical errors. Greater variety in sentence structure and use of transitional words needed (See page 228). |
1-3 grammar, punctuation, and/or mechanical errors. Some transitional words and phrases are incorporated. |
Sentence structure and word choice is varied, complex and adheres to conventions of academic writing. Transitional words logically connect ideas. No problems with punctuation or grammar. |
|
Manuscript Form
|
Document does not follow conventions of MLA manuscript form. |
Distracting errors in page layout, margins, or spacing. Header/page numbers missing. |
Minor errors in page layout, indentation, margins, spacing, font type or size. |
Document is formatted with proper header, indentation, margins, spacing, font and page numbers. |
+ Good job: – Focus on: