Wk 2

Criteria

Satisfactory

Needs Improvement

Not Evident

Population

(10% of Grade)

Clearly describes the population being studied in the article

There are gaps in the description of the population being studied

Does not describe the population being studied in the article

Data Collected: Sample Chosen

(10% of Grade)

Clearly describes how the sample was chosen

There are gaps in the description of how the sample was chosen

Does not describe how the sample was chosen

Data Collected: Is Sample Representative of Population

(20% of Grade)

Discusses if the sample is representative of the population and provides relevant examples to support claims

Discusses if the sample is representative of the population, but does not provides relevant examples to support claims

Does not discuss if the sample is representative of the population

Data Collected: Experiment or Study

(10% of Grade)

States if the article is an experiment or a study and supports claim

States if the article is an experiment or a study, but does not support claim

Does not state if the article is an experiment or a study

Data Collected: Design

(30% of Grade)

Clearly describes how the experiment or study was designed

There are gaps in the description of how the experiment or study was designed

Does not describe how the experiment or study was designed

Results

(15% of Grade)

Discusses if the results of the experiment/study could be applied to other youth detention centers and clearly explains why

Discusses if the results of the experiment/study could be applied to other youth detention centers, but does not clearly explain why

Does not discuss if the results of the experiment/study could be applied to other youth detention centers

Writing Mechanics

(5% of Grade)

Submission is well organized and contains no errors regarding spelling or grammar

Errors in organization, spelling, or grammar but submission is still readable

Errors in organization, spelling, or grammar affect the readability of the submission