Leadership Development Plan

profilecutum1
leadership_development_plan_grading_rubric.docx

SMGT 633

Leadership Development Plan Grading Rubric

Criteria

Levels of Achievement

Points

Earned

Proficient

Competent

Novice

Quality of Information

46 to 50 points

Information clearly relates to the main topic and is accurate. It includes several supporting details and/or examples.

41 to 45 points

Information clearly relates to the main topic, with only one inaccurate piece of information. No details and/or examples are given.

0 to 40 points

Information has little or no relation to the main topic or is confusing. Accuracy of the information is questionable.

Organization

46 to 50 points

Information is very organized and ordered in a logical fashion.

41 to 45 points

Information is organized, with minor disruptions in the flow of the presentation.

0 to 40 points

Information is disorganized with no clear plan or flow.

Content

73 to 80 points

All topics are thoroughly addressed and/or all questions are answered.

65 to 72 points

All or most topics are generally, but not comprehensively addressed and all or most questions were answered.

0 to 64 points

Topics and/or questions were not addressed satisfactorily.

Cooperation

73 to 80 points

Group shares tasks and student significantly contributed to the project.

65 to 72 points

Group shares most tasks and student adequately contributed to the project.

0 to 64 points

Group tasks are unevenly shared. Student does not adequately contribute to the project.

Sources

37 to 40 points

All sources (information and graphics) are accurately documented in the desired format.

33 to 36 points

All sources (information and graphics) are accurately documented, but some are not in the desired format.

0 to 32 points

Sources are not accurately documented or formatted.

Presentation

73 to 80 points

Presentation is clean and well thought out. Overall power, insight, and impact of the project are well represented.

65 to 72 points

Presentation is clean and displays some forethought. Overall power, insight, and impact of the project are adequately displayed.

0 to 64 points

Presentation is disorganized and shows little sign of planning. Power, insight, and impact of the project are lacking.

Mechanics

27 to 30 points

2 or less current APA formatting, grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors are present.

23 to 26 points

3–5 current APA formatting, grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors are present.

0 to 22 points

More than 5 current APA formatting, grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors are present.

Instructor’s Comments: