case analysis

Very good - critical analysis evident, citations incorporated to provide strong evidence of analysis

70.0 pts

Fair - shows basic level of effort; critical analysis minimal, at least 1 citation incorporated

59.0 pts

Poor - minimal to no level of effort; critical analysis not evident, no citations.

10.0 pts

No Submission - responses were not submitted by deadline. Late work is not accepted the day of the Study Circle.

0.0 pts

Full Marks - working microphone and speakers; participates in group discussion for write-up creation

10.0 pts

No Marks - microphone was not used. Participation via chat box is not acceptable.

0.0 pts

Excellent: student emerges as thought leader in discussion, offering new insights and demonstrates critical analysis of case. Actively engaged and leads discussion.

10.0 pts

Satisfactory: student participates in discussion but offers few new insights; repeats content with little effort to extend it in new ways.

5.0 pts

Needs Improvement: student attends session but is largely non-participatory.

0.0 pts

Excellent: concise and articulate; provides thoughtful insights; includes external resources and references to textbook. Fully demonstrates application of the Unit's topic.

10.0 pts

Satisfactory: write-up is "good" but does not demonstrate in-depth analysis and insights; primarily provides 'face value' data from the case and/or general knowledge available to student due to familiarity with the brand; includes at least 1 external resource or reference to the textbook; demonstrates general application of the Unit's topic.

5.0 pts

Needs Improvement: write-up is poorly written; does not demonstrate thorough case analysis nor understanding of the Unit's topic. Typos and/or grammatical errors included.

0.0 pts