Critically examine the internal and external value of sustainability reporting using a recent report of a company of your choice.
j.mas95
tute_question_marking_rubric1.pdf
Assessment 1b Tutorial Questions [S1 2017]
Consider the criteria in the rubric carefully. The rubric addresses discipline knowledge, critical thinking and communication skills. Try and identify what each rubric calls for and, if unsure, do not hesitate to ask your Lecturer.
Levels of Achievement
Criteria Below Expectations (Fail) 049
Meets Expectations (Pass) 5059
Meets Expectations (Credit) 6069
Exceeds Expectations (Distinction) 7079
Exceeds Expectations (High Distinction) 80 100
Relevant Information (DK)
0.1 Points Did not sufficiently identify and use information and/or data.
0.2 Points Identifies and uses some relevant information and/or data.
0.3 Points Identifies and appropriately uses some relevant information and/or data.
0.4 Points Identifies and appropriately uses a range of relevant information and/or data.
0.5 Points Identifies and appropriately uses a wide range of relevant information and/or data.
Identification of issues (DK)
0.1 Points Did not sufficiently identify the key practices, principles or theories applicable to resolving business issues and/or problems.
0.2 Points Identifies some of the key practices, principles or theories applicable to resolving straightforward business issues and/or problems
0.3 Points Identifies the key practices, principles or theories applicable to resolving straightforward business issues and/or problems.
0.4 Points Identifies some of the key practices, principles or theories applicable to resolving business issues and/or problems with complex interrelationships
0.5 Points Identifies the key practices, principles or theories applicable to resolving business issues and/or problems with complex interrelationships.
Name
Description
Rubric Detail
Levels of Achievement
Criteria Below Expectations (Fail) 049
Meets Expectations (Pass) 5059
Meets Expectations (Credit) 6069
Exceeds Expectations (Distinction) 7079
Exceeds Expectations (High Distinction) 80 100
Issue (CT) 0.2 Points The issue / problem to be considered critically is not clearly stated and described. There are significant omissions and/or errors.
0.4 Points The issue / problem to be considered critically is stated clearly and described with enough information for an adequate understanding. There are some omissions and/or errors.
0.6 Points The issue / problem to be considered critically is stated clearly and described with enough information for an adequate understanding. There are no omissions and/or errors.
0.8 Points The issue/ problem to be considered critically is stated clearly and described thoroughly.
1 Points The issue / problem to be considered critically is stated clearly and described comprehensively (delivering all relevant information necessary for a full understanding).
Evidencebased Analysis (CT)
0.2 Points The analysis is not coherent and is based on irrelevant information, concepts and methods. The analysis is based on very limited source(s) or only those provided.
0.4 Points A coherent analysis is based on partial use of relevant information, concepts and methods. The information analysed is gathered from several, relevant source(s) beyond those provided.
0.6 Points A coherent analysis is based on thorough use of relevant information, concepts and methods. The information analysed is gathered from several, relevant source(s) beyond those provided.
0.8 Points A coherent and comprehensive analysis is based on thorough use of the most relevant information, concepts and methods The information analysed is gathered from many diverse, high quality source(s) beyond those provided.
1 Points A coherent and complete analysis is based on complete use of all relevant information, concepts and methods The information analysed is gathered from many diverse, high quality source(s) beyond those provided.
Perspective (CT) 0.2 Points The perspective is unclear and does not account for the complexities of the issue. Others' perspectives are not acknowledged.
0.4 Points The perspective is clear and takes into account some of the complexities of an issue. Others' perspectives are acknowledged.
0.6 Points The perspective is clear and takes into account most of the complexities of an issue. Others' perspectives are acknowledged.
0.8 Points The perspective is comprehensive taking into account most of the complexities of the issue. Others' perspectives are analysed and synthesised. The limits of the position are acknowledged.
1 Points The perspective is comprehensive taking into account all of the complexities of the issue. Others' perspectives are completely analysed and synthesised. The limits of the position are completely acknowledged.
Levels of Achievement
Criteria Below Expectations (Fail) 049
Meets Expectations (Pass) 5059
Meets Expectations (Credit) 6069
Exceeds Expectations (Distinction) 7079
Exceeds Expectations (High Distinction) 80 100
Conclusions and/or Recommendations (DK)
0.1 Points States general conclusions and/or recommendations which are not fully supported by the analysis and development.
0.2 Points Draws limited conclusions and/or recommendations which follow logically from the analysis and development of explicit elements in the topic.
0.3 Points Draws conclusions and/or recommendations which follow logically from the analysis and development of explicit elements in the topic.
0.4 Points Draws conclusions and/or recommendations which follow logically from the analysis and development of all explicit and some implicit elements evident in the topic.
0.5 Points Draws conclusions and/or recommendations which follow logically from the analysis and development of both explicit and implicit elements evident in the topic.
Control of Syntax and Mechanics (WC)
0.1 Points Did not use language that conveys meaning to readers with sufficient clarity and includes numerous errors.
0.2 Points Uses language sufficiently well to convey basic meaning although errors reduce effectiveness of communication.
0.3 Points Uses language that generally conveys meaning to readers with clarity although writing may include some errors.
0.4 Points Uses language that effectively conveys meaning to readers with clarity. Any errors which occur do not reduce effectiveness of communication.
0.5 Points Uses language that skilfully and effectively communicates meaning to readers with clarity and fluency, and is virtually errorfree
Print Close Window
View Associated Items
