Human resource homework
Chapter 10
Reward Systems
and Legal Issues
10-*
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
1.pdf
P e r f o r m a n c e m a n ag e m e n t t h i r d e d i t i o n
h e r m a n ag u i n i s www.pearsonhighered.com
ISBN-13: ISBN-10:
978-0-13-255638-5 0-13-255638-3
9 7 8 0 1 3 2 5 5 6 3 8 5
9 0 0 0 0 a
g u
in is
P er
fo r
m a
n c
e m a
n a
g em
en t
t h
ir d
e d
it io
n
Overview
- Reward Systems
- Legal Issues
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
10-*
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Reward Systems: Overview
- Traditional and Contingent Pay (CP) Plans
Reasons for Introducing CP Plans
Possible Problems Associated with CP
Selecting a CP Plan
- Putting Pay in Context
- Pay Structures
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
10-*
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Traditional Pay
- Salary and salary increases are based on
Position
Seniority
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
10-*
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Contingent Pay (CP)
- Salary and salary increases are based on:
Job performance
- Also called: Pay for Performance
- If not added to base pay, called:
Variable pay
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
10-*
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Reasons for Introducing CP (1)
- Performance management is more effective when rewards are tied to results.
- CP Plans force organizations to:
Clearly define effective performance
Determine what factors are necessary
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
10-*
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Reasons for Introducing CP (2)
- Supervisors and employees are better able to understand what really matters.
- CP plans enhance employee motivation to accomplish goals that match organizational needs.
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
10-*
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Reasons for Introducing CP (3)
- CP plans help to recruit and retain top performers.
- CP plans projects good corporate image.
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
10-*
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
CP Plans Help Improve Motivation When:
Employees see clear link between their efforts and resulting performance. (Expectancy)
Employees see clear link between their performance level and rewards received. (Instrumentality)
Employees value the rewards available. (Valence)
motivation =
expectancy x instrumentality x valence
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
10-*
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Possible Problems Associated with CP
- Poor performance management system
- Rewarding counterproductive behavior
(Rewarding A while hoping for B)
- Rewards are not considered significant
- Managers are not accountable
(The reward becomes the driver)
- Extrinsic vs. intrinsic motivation
- Disproportionately large rewards for executives
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
10-*
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Selecting a CP Plan: Issues to Consider
Culture of organization
Strategic direction of organization
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
10-*
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Culture of Organization: Types of Organizations
- Traditional
Top-down decision making
Vertical communication
Jobs that are clearly defined
- Involvement
Shared decision making
Lateral communications
Loosely defined roles
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
10-*
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
CP Systems for Different Organizational Cultures
- Traditional organizations
Piece rate
Sales commissions
Group incentives
- Involvement organizations
Profit sharing
Skill-based pay
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
10-*
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
CP Plans to Enhance
Strategic Directions
- Employee development
Skill-based pay
- Customer service
Competency-based pay
Gainsharing
- Overall profit
Executive pay
Profit or stock sharing
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
10-*
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
CP Plans to Enhance Strategic Directions (1)
- Productivity
Individual
Piece rate
Sales commissions
Group
Gainsharing
Group incentives
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
10-*
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
CP Plans to Enhance Strategic Directions (2)
- Teamwork
Team sales commissions
Gainsharing
Competency-based pay
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
10-*
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Putting Pay in Context
A reward increases the chance that:
- Specific behaviors and results will be repeated, or
- Employee will engage in new behavior and produce better results.
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
10-*
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Rewards Can Include:
- Pay
- Recognition
Public
Private
- Status
- Time
- Sabbaticals
- Trust and Respect
- Challenge
- Responsibility
- Freedom
- Relationships
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
10-*
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
How to Make Rewards Work
- Define and measure performance first and then allocate rewards.
- Only use rewards that are available.
- Make sure all employees are eligible.
- Rewards should be both
Financial
Nonfinancial
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
10-*
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
How to Make Rewards Work (Continued)
- Rewards should be:
Visible
Contingent
Timely
Reversible
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
10-*
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Pay Structures
- Job Evaluation
- Broad-banding
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
10-*
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Pay Structures
An organization’s pay structure
Classifies jobs
Into categories
Based on their relative worth
Is designed by job evaluation methods
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
10-*
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Job Evaluation
- Method of data collection
Determine the worth of various jobs
Create a pay structure
- Consideration of
KSAs required for each job
Value of job for organization
How much other organizations pay
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
10-*
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Types of Job Evaluation Methods
- Ranking
- Classification
- Point
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
10-*
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Ranking
- Create job descriptions
- Compare job descriptions
- Rank jobs
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
10-*
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Advantages of Using Ranking Method
- Requires little time
- Minimal effort needed for administration
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
10-*
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Disadvantages of Using Ranking Method
- Criteria for ranking may not be clear.
- Distances between each rank may not be equal.
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
10-*
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Classification
- A series of classes or grades are created.
- Each job is placed within a job class.
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
10-*
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Advantages of Using Classification Method
- Jobs can be quickly slotted into structure
- Employees accept method because it seems valid.
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
10-*
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Disadvantages of Using Classification Method
- Requires extensive time and effort for administration
- Differences between classification levels may not be equal
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
10-*
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Point Method
- Identify compensable factors (job characteristics)
- Scale factors (e.g. on a scale of 1 through 5)
- Assign a weight to each factor so the sum of the weights for all factors = 100 percent
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
10-*
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Advantages of Using Point Method
- Establishes worth of each job relative to all other jobs within organization
- Comprehensive measurement of relative worth of each job in organization
- Easy to rank jobs when total points are known for each job
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
10-*
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Disadvantages of Using Point Method
- Requires extensive administrative
Time
Effort
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
10-*
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Does Job Evaluation Method Matter?
Fairness
Evaluators
Impartial
Objective
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
10-*
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Compensation Surveys
- Information on
Base pay
All other types of compensation
- Conducted in-house or by consultants, such as:
www.salary.com or www.haypaynet.com
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
10-*
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Broad-Banding
- Most commonly used pay structure
- Pay structure collapses job classes into fewer (less than five) categories
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
10-*
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Advantages of Broad-Banding
- Provides flexibility in rewarding people
- Reflects changes in organization structure
- Provides better base for rewarding growth in competence
- Gives more responsibility for pay decisions to managers
- Provides better basis for rewarding career progression
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
10-*
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Reward Systems: Summary
- Traditional and Contingent Pay (CP) Plans
Reasons for Introducing CP Plans
Possible Problems Associated with CP
Selecting a CP Plan
- Putting Pay in Context
- Pay Structures
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
10-*
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Legal Issues: Overview
- Performance Management and the Law
- Some Legal Principles Affecting PM
- Laws Affecting PM
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
10-*
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Performance Management and the Law
- Performance management systems are usually legally sound if…
Procedures are standardized
Same procedures are used with all employees
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
10-*
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Some Legal Principles Affecting PM: Overview
- Employment-at-will
- Negligence
- Defamation
- Misrepresentation
- Adverse Impact
- Illegal Discrimination
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
10-*
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Employment-at-Will
- Employment relationship can be ended at any time by:
Employer
Employee
- Exceptions:
Implied contract
Possible violation of legal rights
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
10-*
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Negligence
- If organization documents describe a system
and
- It is not implemented as described,
- Employee can challenge evaluation, charging negligence.
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
10-*
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Defamation
- Disclosure of performance information that is
Untrue and
Unfavorable
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
10-*
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Misrepresentation
- Disclosure of performance information that is
Untrue and
Favorable
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
10-*
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Adverse Impact / Unintentional Discrimination
- PM system has unintentional impact on a protected class.
- Organization must demonstrate:
A specific KSA is a business requirement for the job
All affected employees are evaluated in the same way
- Organization should review ongoing performance score data by protected class to implement corrective action as necessary.
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
10-*
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Illegal Discrimination or Disparate Treatment
- Raters assign different scores to employees based on factors that are NOT related to performance.
- Employees receive different treatment as result of such ratings.
- Employees can claim they were intentionally and illegally treated differently due to their status.
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
10-*
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Employee Claim of Illegal Discrimination
- Direct evidence of discrimination, or
- Evidence regarding the following:
Membership in protected class
Adverse employment decision
Performance level deserved reward/different treatment
How others were treated (not in protected class)
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
10-*
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Employer Response to Claim of Illegal Discrimination
- Legitimate and nondiscriminatory reason for action
- Related to performance
Note: Good performance management system and subsequent performance-related decision, used consistently with all employees, provide defense
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
10-*
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Difference Between
Legal and Illegal Discrimination
- LEGAL discrimination discriminates among employees based on their level of performance.
- ILLEGAL discrimination is based on variables that should not usually be related to performance.
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
10-*
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Laws Affecting PM
During past few decades, several countries have passed laws prohibiting discrimination based on:
- Race or Ethnicity
- Sex
- Religion
- National Origin
- Age
- Disability status
- Sexual orientation
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
10-*
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Laws in the United Kingdom
- Equal Pay Act of 1970
- Race Relations Act of 1976
- Sex Discrimination Act of 1975
- Disability Discrimination Act of 1995
- Employment Equality (Sexual Orientation) Regulations 2003
- Employment Equality (Religion or Belief) Regulations 2003
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
10-*
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Laws in the United States of America
- Equal Pay Act of 1963
- Civil Rights Act of 1964
- Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (as amended in 1986)
- Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
10-*
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Characteristics of Legally Sound PM Systems
- Organization:
The system is formally explained and communicated to all employees.
The system includes a formal appeals process.
Procedures are standardized and uniform for all employees within a job group.
The system includes procedures to detect potentially discriminatory effects or biases and abuses in the system.
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
10-*
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Characteristics of Legally Sound PM Systems
- Management
Supervisors are provided with formal training and information on how to manage the performance of their employees.
Performance information is gathered from multiple, diverse, and unbiased raters.
The system includes thorough and consistent documentation including specific examples of performance based on first-hand knowledge.
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
10-*
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Characteristics of Legally Sound PM Systems
- Employees
Performance dimensions and standards are:
Clearly defined and explained to the employee,
Job-related, and
Within the control of the employee.
Employees are given
Timely information on performance deficiencies and
Opportunities to correct them.
Employees are given a voice in the review process and treated with courtesy and civility throughout the process.
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
10-*
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Legal Issues: Summary
- Performance Management and the Law
- Some Legal Principles Affecting PM
- Laws Affecting PM
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
10-*
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Quick Review
- Reward Systems
- Legal Issues
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
10-*
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Printed in the United States of America.
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
10-*
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
*