|
Criteria
|
Unsatisfactory
|
Marginal
|
Emerging
|
Proficient
|
Exemplary
|
Score
|
|
Assignment Components:
|
|
Synthesized applicable HR laws or theories to the case analysis.
|
0-23 Points
Did not identify HR laws or theories.
Unsupported with research.
|
24- 27 Points
Identifies HR laws or theories as apply to the case.
Lacks credible research support.
|
28-31 Points
Described some HR laws or theories as apply to the case.
Weakly supported with research.
|
32-35 Points
Synthesized HR laws or theories with the case.
Sufficiently supported with research.
|
36 -40 Points
Clear, concise, and compelling synthesis of HR laws and theories with the case.
Well supported by research.
|
10 of 40 The beginning of the paper is very confusing and does not talk about laws that impact the situation. Please work on writing, make sure to proofread work.
|
|
Analyzed a recruitment process that will help to reduce turnover and disciplinary actions.
|
0-23 Points
Did not identify process that will help to reduce turnover and disciplinary actions.
Unsupported with research.
|
24-27 Points
Identified process that will help to reduce turnover and disciplinary actions.
Lacks credible research support.
|
28-31 Points
Described process that will help to reduce turnover and disciplinary actions.
Weakly supported with research.
|
32-35 Points
Analyzed process that will help to reduce turnover and disciplinary actions.
Sufficiently supported with research.
|
36-40 Points
Clear, concise, and compelling analysis of process that will help to reduce turnover and disciplinary actions.
Well supported by research.
|
25 of 40 Please work on writing, the flow of the paper is not very organized. Discipline is talked about in 2 places, when there should be one section.
|
|
Analyzed the pros and cons of a formal disciplinary process for the organization.
|
0-23 Points
Did not identify pros and cons for having formal disciplinary process.
Unsupported with research.
|
24-27 Points
Identified pros and cons for having for having formal disciplinary process.
Lacks credible research support.
|
28-31 Points
Described pros and cons for having formal disciplinary process.
Weakly supported with research.
|
32-35 Points
Evaluated pros and cons for having formal disciplinary process.
Sufficiently supported with research.
|
36-40 Points
Clear, concise, and compelling evaluation of pros and cons for having formal disciplinary process.
Well supported by research.
|
20 of 40 Please work on writing, there are some writing tools in the classroom under Academic Resources. Please explore these areas. Writing should be clear and using precise language. There are no in-text citations to support work.
|
|
Defended at least three specific recommendations you would make to the university president.
|
0-23 Points
Did not identify at least three specific recommendations.
Unsupported with research.
|
24-27 Points
Identified at least three specific recommendations.
Lacks credible research support.
|
28-31 Points
Described at least three specific recommendations.
Weakly supported with research.
|
32-35 Points
Defended at least three specific recommendations.
Sufficiently supported with research.
|
36-40 Points
Clear, concise, and defense at least three specific recommendations.
Well supported by research.
|
10 of 40 Please make sure to review the grading rubric, the goal was 3 recommendations. Behavioral assessments serve many purposes, the goal should be to focus on hiring the right person not who is going to leave. Please work on writing.
|
|
|
Written Components:
|
|
Organization
Introduction
Transitions
Conclusion
|
0-5 Points
Introduction is missing.
Transitions between ideas are missing. .
Conclusion is missing.
|
6 Points
Introduction is limited or unclear.
Transitions between ideas are infrequent, illogical, or unclear.
Conclusion is limited or unclear.
|
7 Points
Introduction is present but incomplete or underdeveloped
Transitions between ideas are sporadic.
Conclusion is recognizable, but incomplete or underdeveloped.
|
8 Points
Introduction has an opening, provides some background information, and states the topic.
Transitions between ideas are present.
Conclusion summarizes main argument and has a clear ending.
|
9-10 Points
Introduction catches the audience’s attention, provides compelling and appropriate background information, and clearly states the topic.
Thoughtful transitions between ideas are appropriate and help the flow of ideas.
Conclusion leaves the listener with a sense of closure and provides concluding insights.
|
5 of 10 The introduction is brief and does not describe the full situation or contain a thesis statement.
|
|
Style
Tone
Audience
Word Choice
|
0-5 Points
Tone, audience, and/or word choice is inappropriate for the assignment.
|
6 Points
Tone, audience, and/or word choice is unclear in how it relates to the assignment.
|
7 Points
Tone, audience, and/or word choice is somewhat appropriate for the assignment.
|
8 Points
Tone, audience, and/or word choice is appropriate for the assignment.
|
9-10 Points
Tone, audience, and/or word choice is appropriate for the assignment and is clear and well written.
|
5 of 10 Please work on using the proper terms and verbiage for the topic being covered.
|
|
Usage and Mechanics
Grammar
Spelling
Sentence structure
|
0-5 Points
Writing contains numerous errors in spelling, grammar, and/or sentence structure that severely interferes with readability and comprehension.
|
6 Points
Writing contains errors in spelling and grammar that interfere with comprehension.
|
7 Points
Writing contains errors in spelling and grammar that somewhat interfere with comprehension.
|
8 Points
Writing follows conventions of spelling and grammar throughout. Errors are infrequent and do not interfere with comprehension.
|
9-10 Points
The presentation is basically error free in terms of mechanics. Grammar and mechanics help establish a clear idea and aid the reader in following the writer’s logic.
|
5 of 10 Please proofread papers, there are numerous writing errors. Reading papers outloud will help find writing errors.
|
|
APA Elements
Attribution
Paraphrasing
Quotations
When appropriate or assigned
|
0-5 Points
No attempt at APA formatting in presentation.
|
6 Points
APA format is attempted. Paraphrased, quoted, and cited, but errors are significant.
|
7 Points
APA format is attempted. Paraphrased, quoted, and cited, but errors are somewhat significant and distracting.
|
8 Points
Using APA format, accurately. Paraphrased, quoted, and cited in most areas throughout when appropriate. Errors present are mostly minor.
|
9-10 Points
Using APA format, accurately. Paraphrased, quoted, and cited throughout the presentation when appropriate. Only a few minor errors present.
|
5 of 10 Please review the videos in the Webliography section of class. Also please review announcements about in-text citations. This paper was missing a vast amount of in-text citations.
|
|
|
Comments
|
Total Score 85 of 200
|
bcestevelz1j3
score.docx
0
