HR Roles Mind Map and job requirements
1
2
|
Criterion |
Unsatisfactory |
Satisfactory |
|
Major points are stated clearly, are supported by specific details, examples or analysis, and are organized logically |
Little organization for major points. Examples are not given, details are not provided, or analysis is missing. |
Paper is well-organized. Most points are well-supported with details and examples. |
|
Introduction provides sufficient background on the topic and previews major points |
No introduction, or no clear preview of major points, or no background along with major points. |
Provides background and previews major points well. |
|
The conclusion is logical, flows from the body of the paper, and reviews major points. |
No conclusion or conclusion introduces new materials instead of summarizing what has been presented. |
Conclusion summarizes major points and makes clear recommendations or takes a position. |
|
Paper meets assignment guidelines for length |
Assignment is considerably shorter or longer than required.
Exceed max of 10% directly quoted material. |
Assignment is within guidelines. |
|
Paragraph transitions are present and logical and maintain the flow throughout the paper. |
Paper does not flow clearly, or is disorganized.
Overuse of bullets or lists. |
Most paragraph transitions are well done. Section and subsection headings help define the flow. |
|
Tone is appropriate to the content and assignment. |
Uses inappropriate voice or presents information from a biased viewpoint. Does not distinguish between facts and opinions. |
Uses appropriate “voice” for the assignment, and presents information in a factual and professional manner. |
|
Sentences are complete, clear and concise. |
Frequent use of sentence fragments, run-on sentences, or awkward phrasing. |
No sentence fragments or run-on sentences. |
|
Sentences are well-constructed with consistently strong, varied sentences. |
Uses passive voice frequently, tends to have simple sentences and phrases. |
Good use of active voice, with well-written, interesting sentences. |
|
Sentence transitions are present and maintain the flow of thought. |
Sentences frequently unconnected with rough transitions. Over use of bulleted lists. |
Sentences flow well. |
Mechanics (APA, Spelling & Grammar)
|
Criterion |
Unsatisfactory |
Satisfactory |
|
The paper, including the title page, reference page, tables and appendices follow APA guidelines for format |
Nothing follows APA format. References are missing information. |
Margins, title page, reference pages, etc. all follow APA format.
|
|
Citations of original works within the body of the paper follow APA guidelines |
Incorrect or missing citations. Block quotes are not handled correctly. Required information is not all present. |
Text citations are correct. Block quotes are properly indented and formatted. All information is present.
|
|
Paper is written in MS Word |
Paper is not compatible with MS Word |
Paper is compatible with MS Word and submitted in Word Format |
|
The paper is laid out with effective use of headings, font styles, and white space. |
No headings or headings not in APA format. Inconsistant font styles or colors. |
Headings, properly formatted, and fonts are appropriate to the assignment. |
|
Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed. |
Frequent errors. Uses first or second person in writing.
|
Paper is generally error-free. Paper is written in academic style and in third person.
|
|
Spelling is correct. |
Frequent spelling errors or misuse of homonyms, etc. |
Spelling is generally error-free. |