Evaluate Team Member Effectiveness
thetruth2
evaluation.pdf
4/18/2017 Assignment Print View
http://ezto.mheducation.com/hm.tpx?todo=printviewSingle 1/5
1. Award: 10 out of 10.00 points
Score: 10/10 Points 100 %
SelfAssessment 8.3: Evaluate (Your) Team Member Effectiveness
To assess your own team member effectiveness, complete the assessment answering each item in terms of the extent you agree that you do each. Calculate your overall team effectiveness score and compare it to the norms listed below to gauge your general team member effectiveness.
Next, calculate the subtotal for each competency and compare your subtotals to the arbitrary norms listed below to assess your effectiveness on each competency. Then, to determine which competencies are the strongest and weakest for you, calculate your average for each and compare them. The averages are computed by taking the subtotal for each and dividing it by the number of items for that competency. This will show you the relative strength of your team competencies.
Improve the value of this measure further still by evaluating yourself in terms of your effectiveness in a particular team (school, work, or other organization). Then, have a member of that same team evaluate you. Compare your scores with those given by your teammate, identify the consistent scores and those that differ, and use this feedback to improve your own team member effectiveness.
St ro ng ly Di sa gr ee
Di sa gr ee
So m ew ha t A gr ee
Ag re e
St ro ng ly Ag re e
N/ A N ot A pp lic ab le. ..
* 1. Did a fair share of the team's work.
* 2. Fulfilled responsibilities to the team.
* 3. Completed work in a timely manner.
* 4. Came to team meetings prepared.
* 5. Did work that was complete and accurate.
* 6. Communicated effectively.
* 7. Exchanged information with teammates in a timely manner.
* 8. Provided encouragement to other team members.
* 9. Accepted feedback about strengths and weaknesses from teammates.
* 10. Used teammates' feedback to improve performance.
* 11. Let other team members help when it was necessary.
* 12. Stayed aware of fellow team members' progress.
* 13. Assessed whether the team was making progress as expected.
* 14. Provided constructive feedback to others on the team.
* 15. Made sure that everyone on the team understood important
4/18/2017 Assignment Print View
http://ezto.mheducation.com/hm.tpx?todo=printviewSingle 2/5
Contributing to the Team’s Work
0 10 pts. Feedback: Low contribution
Interacting with Teammates
0 12 pts. Feedback: Low level of interaction
Keeping the Team on Track
0 10 pts. Feedback: Not very skilled at keeping on track
Expecting Quality
0 6 pts. Feedback: Low quality expectations
Having Relevant Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities (KSAs)
5 7 pts. Feedback: Moderately relevant knowledge and skills
0 42 pts. Feedback: Less effective team member
Source: Adapted from M. W. Ohland, M. L. Loughry, D. J. Woehr, L. G. Bullard, R. M. Felder, C. J. Finelli, R. A. Layton, H. R. Pomeranz, and D. G. Schmucker, “The Comprehensive Assessment of Team Member Effectiveness: Development of a Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scale for Self and Peer Evaluation,” Academy of Management Learning & Education, 2012, pp. 609–630.
Score : 7 pts.
Score : 9 pts.
Score : 8 pts.
Score : 5 pts.
Score : 5 pts.
Feedback score: Score : 34 pts.
Rangebased Feedback:
* 15. Made sure that everyone on the team understood important information.
* 16. Helped the team to plan and organize its work.
* 17. Expected the team to succeed.
* 18. Believed that the team should achieve high standards.
* 19. Cared that the team produced highquality work.
* 20. Had the skills and abilities that were necessary to do a good job.
* 21. Had enough knowledge of teammates’ jobs to be able to fill in if necessary.
rev: 03_16_2016_QC_CS44758
SelfAssessment 8.3: Evaluate (Your) Team Member Effectiveness
To assess your own team member effectiveness, complete the assessment answering each item in terms of the extent you agree that you do each. Calculate your overall team effectiveness score and compare it to the norms listed below to gauge your general team member effectiveness.
Next, calculate the subtotal for each competency and compare your subtotals to the arbitrary norms listed below to assess your effectiveness on each competency. Then, to determine which competencies are the strongest and weakest for you, calculate your average for each and compare them. The averages are computed by taking the subtotal for each and dividing it by the number of items for that competency. This will show you the relative strength of your team competencies.
Improve the value of this measure further still by evaluating yourself in terms of your effectiveness in a particular team (school, work, or other organization). Then, have a member of that same team evaluate you. Compare your scores with those given by your teammate, identify the consistent scores and those that differ, and use this feedback to improve your own team member effectiveness.
St ro ng ly Di sa gr ee | 1 pt s.
Di sa gr ee | 2 pt s.
So m ew ha t A gr ee | 3 pt s.
Ag re e | 4 pt s.
St ro ng ly Ag re e | 5 pt s.
4/18/2017 Assignment Print View
http://ezto.mheducation.com/hm.tpx?todo=printviewSingle 3/5
Contributing to the Team’s Work
Interacting with Teammates
Keeping the Team on Track
This question accepts all answers.
St ro ng ly Di sa gr ee | 1 pt s.
Di sa gr ee | 2 pt s.
So m ew ha t A gr ee | 3 pt s.
Ag re e | 4 pt s.
St ro ng ly Ag re e | 5 pt s.
N/ A N ot A pp lic ab le. .. | 0 pt s.
* 1. Did a fair share of the team's work. (1wt.)
* 2. Fulfilled responsibilities to the team. (1wt.)
* 3. Completed work in a timely manner. (1wt.)
* 4. Came to team meetings prepared. (1wt.)
* 5. Did work that was complete and accurate. (1wt.)
St ro ng ly Di sa gr ee | 1 pt s.
Di sa gr ee | 2 pt s.
So m ew ha t A gr ee | 3 pt s.
Ag re e | 4 pt s.
St ro ng ly Ag re e | 5 pt s.
N/ A N ot A pp lic ab le. .. | 0 pt s.
* 6. Communicated effectively. (1wt.)
* 7. Exchanged information with teammates in a timely manner. (1wt.)
* 8. Provided encouragement to other team members. (1wt.)
* 9. Accepted feedback about strengths and weaknesses from teammates. (1wt.)
* 10. Used teammates' feedback to improve performance. (1wt.)
* 11. Let other team members help when it was necessary. (1wt.)
St ro ng ly Di sa gr ee | 1 pt s.
Di sa gr ee | 2 pt s.
So m ew ha t A gr ee | 3 pt s.
Ag re e | 4 pt s.
St ro ng ly Ag re e | 5 pt s.
N/ A N ot A pp lic ab le. .. | 0 pt s.
* 12. Stayed aware of fellow team members' progress. (1wt.)
* 13. Assessed whether the team was making progress as expected. (1wt.)
* 14. Provided constructive feedback to others on the team. (1wt.)
* 15. Made sure that everyone on the team understood important information. (1wt.)
St ro ng ly Di sa gr ee | 1 pt s.
Di sa gr ee | 2 pt s.
So m ew ha t A gr ee | 3 pt s.
Ag re e | 4 pt s.
St ro ng ly Ag re e | 5 pt s.
N/ A N ot A pp lic ab le. .. | 0 pt s.
4/18/2017 Assignment Print View
http://ezto.mheducation.com/hm.tpx?todo=printviewSingle 4/5
Expecting Quality
Having Relevant Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities (KSAs)
Feedback: Contributing to the Team’s Work
20 25 pts.
11 19 pts.
0 10 pts.
Interacting with Teammates
24 30 pts.
13 23 pts.
0 12 pts.
Keeping the Team on Track
20 25 pts.
11 19 pts.
0 10 pts.
St ro ng ly Di sa gr ee | 1 pt s.
Di sa gr ee | 2 pt s.
So m ew ha t A gr ee
Ag re e | 4 pt s.
St ro ng ly Ag re e
N/ A N ot A pp lic ab le. ..
* 16. Helped the team to plan and organize its work. (1wt.)
St ro ng ly Di sa gr ee | 1 pt s.
Di sa gr ee | 2 pt s.
So m ew ha t A gr ee | 3 pt s.
Ag re e | 4 pt s.
St ro ng ly Ag re e | 5 pt s.
N/ A N ot A pp lic ab le. .. | 0 pt s.
* 17. Expected the team to succeed. (1wt.)
* 18. Believed that the team should achieve high standards. (1wt.)
* 19. Cared that the team produced highquality work. (1wt.)
St ro ng ly Di sa gr ee | 1 pt s.
Di sa gr ee | 2 pt s.
So m ew ha t A gr ee | 3 pt s.
Ag re e | 4 pt s.
St ro ng ly Ag re e | 5 pt s.
N/ A N ot A pp lic ab le. .. | 0 pt s.
* 20. Had the skills and abilities that were necessary to do a good job. (1wt.)
* 21. Had enough knowledge of teammates’ jobs to be able to fill in if necessary. (1wt.)
FEEDBACK:
High contribution
FEEDBACK:
Moderate contribution
FEEDBACK:
Low contribution
FEEDBACK:
High level of interaction
FEEDBACK:
Moderate level of interaction
FEEDBACK:
Low level of interaction
FEEDBACK:
Highly skilled at keeping on track
FEEDBACK:
Moderately skilled at keeping on track
FEEDBACK:
Not very skilled at keeping on track
4/18/2017 Assignment Print View
http://ezto.mheducation.com/hm.tpx?todo=printviewSingle 5/5
Expecting Quality
12 15 pts.
7 11 pts.
0 6 pts.
Having Relevant Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities (KSAs)
8 10 pts.
5 7 pts.
0 4 pts.
Rangebased feedback:
0 42 pts.
43 83 pts.
84 105 pts.
Source: Adapted from M. W. Ohland, M. L. Loughry, D. J. Woehr, L. G. Bullard, R. M. Felder, C. J. Finelli, R. A. Layton, H. R. Pomeranz, and D. G. Schmucker, “The Comprehensive Assessment of Team Member Effectiveness: Development of a Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scale for Self and Peer Evaluation,” Academy of Management Learning & Education, 2012, pp. 609–630.
FEEDBACK:
High quality expectations
FEEDBACK:
Moderate quality expectations
FEEDBACK:
Low quality expectations
FEEDBACK:
Highly relevant knowledge and skills
FEEDBACK:
Moderately relevant knowledge and skills
FEEDBACK:
Not particularly relevant knowledge and skills
FEEDBACK:
Less effective team member
FEEDBACK:
Moderately effective team member
FEEDBACK:
Highly effective team member
rev: 03_16_2016_QC_CS44758
