the eight steps in the ethical decision making process dantezz

The eights steps in the in the decision-making model are: Identify the problem, consider the significance of the context and setting, identify and utilize ethical and legal resources, consider personal beliefs and values, develop possible solutions to the problem, consider the potential consequences of various solutions, choose and implement a course of action, and assess the outcome and implement changes as needed and gather as much information as you can that will illuminate the situation (Bush, S.S. Connell, M.A., & Denney, R.L.).

The first step is identifying the problem, is making a decision about refraining from using or trying to conduct many evaluations for the mental health professionals to control that he or she will thoroughly try and think through the weaknesses and strengths of both parties by equally and refraining from and guiding the assessments. When identifying the problem you have to mindful of the different ethical and unethical situations that may arise. When you experience unethical situations a person risks a lot of negative consequences. If a psychologist were to experience this in a co-worker than further action may need to be taken. In any situation when evaluating people certain situations may make you feel uneasy, weigh your options and find a way to narrow down by focusing on the main points that are making you feel a certain type of way.

The second step considering the significance of the context and setting. The mental health psychologist when a person is trying to obtain you must consider if he/she is qualified and competent to do the forensic work (Standard 2.01 Boundaries of Competence, American Psychological Association, 2002). When working as a mental health psychologist there are different settings a psychologist may be working in. An example used in the article was the psychologist pay rate may differ depending on the situation or the services that are being rendered. The schedule of the fee can be different which can cause some type of impartiality. There are outside powers that can impact the assessment and it can be deliberated. An example of features that can impact the answers on the mental health professional are who were employed by the security grounded on the area (Murrie et al., 2009).

The third step is identifying and utilize ethical and legal resources. The article states that this is the most difficult one. You must determine the natural surroundings and proportions of the problem. When doing this there are numerous ways in to confirm that an individual can observe the issue. First they must look at the ethical values of self-sufficiency, non-maleficence, beneficence, justice, and fidelity (2002 APA Ethics Code). You must figure out the values that will apply to the detailed circumstances, and regulate the principle that will take first priority for you in this case.

The forth step is considering personal beliefs and values. When considering a person's beliefs and values you must formulate a possible way of putting everything into play. You can formulate a chart and write down different ideas on different ways to plan a course of action. When you are doing this try to your imagination and try and influence a co-worker to help you develop different ideas. In the article it states that psychologist do have an obligation to value the degree to which their own ethical situations are reliable with the individuals of the higher humanity and the establishments in which they are involved with (Bush, S.S. Connell, M.A., & Denney, R.L.).

The fifth step is develop possible solutions to the problem. You she think about the possible significances of all choices and decide which way to go. Since the data you will or have collected and the goals you will set, you can assess individually each choice and evaluate the possible concerns for each individual that will be involved. Try and consider the effects of each progression for the client and any others individuals that it will affect. Do away with the options that will not give you the right results or that will cause challenging concerns. Make sure you reevaluate the rest of the choices so that you can limit the choices and the different situations and try to talk about the main concerns you have acknowledged or recognized.

The sixth step is consider the potential consequences of various solutions. You must use both positive and negative consequences and they must be weighted in order to get the best course of action according to the article. You should spend time and the means necessary to protect the test data that includes recorded information. The psychologist sometimes fear that consequences, such as upsetting the court lawyers which will lessen the possibility of others who would like to work for them (Bush, S.S. Connell, M.A., & Denney, R.L.).

The seventh step is choose and implement a course of action. The psychologist must decide which course of action is appropriate and must be used the timing must be considered, because if decided at the wrong time it could be very critical. It just depends on the situation if it needs to happen immediately or if it needs to be delayed (Bush, S.S. Connell, M.A., & Denney, R.L.).

The eight step is assess the outcome and implement changes as needed. Regardless of the outcome or the parties involved a psychologist should be ready to receive negative and positive feedback, but they must be ready to respond and give a response as to why they chose a certain course of action. As a psychologist you must look at your own decision and assess whether it was a good or bad decision and implement the needed change (Bush, S.S. Connell, M.A., & Denney, R.L.).

When it comes to the ethical decision-making model strengths and weaknesses of the model in the decision making. The psychologist should jump to conclusions about a certain situations, because this can affect the outcome of your decision. When doing the assessment try to ask questions such as the 5 W's: who, what, where, when, why and how. When you are asking questions or doing the intake on and individual you may not have all the facts around certain ethical issues. You should try to gather as much information as possible for moving or proceeding and try to clarify as much information before you make expectations.

Try not to assume anything before classifying the ethical or unethical issue at hand. Explain the ethical and/or unethical you want to mainly focus on. In certain situations there may be more than one focus on the main issue first. The model is to protect the client, but if its misused and they violated this the client's well-being can be at risk. Counselors have to be stable themselves in order to be able to help others. When providing care you must look at each client separately you cannot treat no two patients the same. The negative outcome of this one person may not be getting properly treated and this could cause some issues with that client. Individuals will mistakably hurt when therapist do not managed their principles or morals and have let them hinder with their behavior objectives and strategies of their clients.

References

American Psychological Association (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of

conduct. American Psychologist, 57, 106-1073.

Murrie, D.C., Boccaccini, M.T., Turner, D.B., Meeks, M., Woods, C., & Tussey, C. (2009).

Rater (dis)agreement on risk assessment measures in sexually violent predator proceedings: Evidence of adversarial allegiance in forensic evaluation? Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 15, 19-53.