Response to Research from Peer
Copyright © 2017 McGraw-‐Hill Educa;on. All rights reserved. No reproduc;on or distribu;on without the prior wriDen consent of McGraw-‐Hill Educa;on. Copyright © 2017 McGraw-‐Hill Educa;on. All rights reserved. No reproduc;on or distribu;on without the prior wriDen consent of McGraw-‐Hill Educa;on.
Chapter 3 Corporate Social Responsibility
and Ci;zenship
Copyright © 2017 McGraw-‐Hill Educa;on. All rights reserved. No reproduc;on or distribu;on without the prior wriDen consent of McGraw-‐Hill Educa;on.
§ Understanding the role of big business and the responsible use of corporate power in a democra8c society.
§ Knowing when the idea of corporate social responsibility originated and inves8ga8ng how a company’s purpose or mission can integrate social objec8ves with economic and legal objec8ves.
§ Examining the key arguments for and against corporate social responsibility.
§ Defining global corporate ci8zenship and recognizing the rapidly evolving management prac8ces to support global ci8zenship.
§ Dis8nguishing among the sequen8al stages of global corporate ci8zenship.
§ Understanding how businesses assess and report their social performance.
3-2
Ch. 3: Key Learning Objec;ves
Copyright © 2017 McGraw-‐Hill Educa;on. All rights reserved. No reproduc;on or distribu;on without the prior wriDen consent of McGraw-‐Hill Educa;on.
§ Corporate Power: Capability of corpora8ons to influence government, the economy, and society, based on their organiza8onal resources.
§ The tremendous power of the world's leading corpora8ons has both posi%ve and nega%ve effects.
Corporate Power and Responsibility
3-3
Copyright © 2017 McGraw-‐Hill Educa;on. All rights reserved. No reproduc;on or distribu;on without the prior wriDen consent of McGraw-‐Hill Educa;on.
Comparison of Annual Sales Revenue and the GDP for Select Transna;onal Corpora;ons and Na;ons, 2014
Figure 3.1
Copyright © 2017 McGraw-‐Hill Educa;on. All rights reserved. No reproduc;on or distribu;on without the prior wriDen consent of McGraw-‐Hill Educa;on.
§ Iron law of responsibility says in the long run, those who do not use power in ways that society considers responsible will tend to lose it.
3-5
Corporate Power and Responsibility
Copyright © 2017 McGraw-‐Hill Educa;on. All rights reserved. No reproduc;on or distribu;on without the prior wriDen consent of McGraw-‐Hill Educa;on.
3-6
The Meaning of Corporate Social Responsibility
• Act in a way that enhances society and its inhabitants and be held accountable.
• Acknowledge any harm to people and society and correct it if possible.
• May forgo some profits if its social impacts hurt its stakeholders or if its funds is usable for a posi8ve social impact.
Copyright © 2017 McGraw-‐Hill Educa;on. All rights reserved. No reproduc;on or distribu;on without the prior wriDen consent of McGraw-‐Hill Educa;on. 3-7
§ Corporate Ci;zenship: the ac8ons they take to put their commitments to corporate social responsibility into prac8ce.
§ The term global corporate ci%zenship, similarly, refers to puLng these commitments into prac8ce worldwide.
§ Companies demonstrate their corporate ci8zenship by: § proac8vely building stakeholder partnerships § discovering business opportuni8es in serving society § transforming a concern for financial performance into a vision of integrated financial and social performance
Corporate Ci;zenship
Copyright © 2017 McGraw-‐Hill Educa;on. All rights reserved. No reproduc;on or distribu;on without the prior wriDen consent of McGraw-‐Hill Educa;on. 3-8
§ In the United States, the idea of corporate social responsibility appeared around the start of the 20th century.
§ Corpora8ons under aRack for being too big, too powerful, and guilty of an8social and an8compe88ve prac8ces.
§ To use their power and influence voluntarily for broad social purposes rather than for profits alone.
à Example: Steelmaker Andrew Carnegie, Henry Ford
The Origins of Corporate Social Responsibility
Copyright © 2017 McGraw-‐Hill Educa;on. All rights reserved. No reproduc;on or distribu;on without the prior wriDen consent of McGraw-‐Hill Educa;on.
§ Frederick provides expanded framework for understanding the evolu8on of CSR concept.
§ Divided into 4 phases:
Corporate Social
Stewardship (1950s-‐1960s)
Corporate social
responsiveness (1960s – 1970s)
Corporate/ business ethics (1980s – 1990s)
Corporate/ global
ci;zenship (1990s – 2000s)
3-9
Phases of Corporate Social Responsibility
Copyright © 2017 McGraw-‐Hill Educa;on. All rights reserved. No reproduc;on or distribu;on without the prior wriDen consent of McGraw-‐Hill Educa;on.
Evolving Phases of Corporate Social Responsibility Figure 3.2
Copyright © 2017 McGraw-‐Hill Educa;on. All rights reserved. No reproduc;on or distribu;on without the prior wriDen consent of McGraw-‐Hill Educa;on.
§ Mul8ple responsibili8es of business include
§ Economic responsibili8es § Social responsibili8es § Legal responsibili8es
§ Challenge is to balance all three.
§ Successful firm is one which finds ways to meet each of its cri8cal responsibili8es and develops strategies to enable the obliga8ons to help each other.
3-10
Economic responsibili8es
Legal Responsibili8es
Social responsibili8es
Balancing Mul;ple Responsibili;es
Copyright © 2017 McGraw-‐Hill Educa;on. All rights reserved. No reproduc;on or distribu;on without the prior wriDen consent of McGraw-‐Hill Educa;on.
§ Economic and social goals come together in companies that prac8ce enlightened self-‐interest § The company’s self-‐interest in the long term to provide: § true value to its customers § to help its employees grow and behave responsibility
à Example: Nestle
3-12
Enlightened Self-‐Interest
Copyright © 2017 McGraw-‐Hill Educa;on. All rights reserved. No reproduc;on or distribu;on without the prior wriDen consent of McGraw-‐Hill Educa;on. 3-13
Figure 3.3
The Corporate Social Responsibility Debate
Copyright © 2017 McGraw-‐Hill Educa;on. All rights reserved. No reproduc;on or distribu;on without the prior wriDen consent of McGraw-‐Hill Educa;on.
Business Execu;ves’ View of the Role of Business in Society
Figure 3.4
Copyright © 2017 McGraw-‐Hill Educa;on. All rights reserved. No reproduc;on or distribu;on without the prior wriDen consent of McGraw-‐Hill Educa;on.
§ Reputa;on refers to desirable or undesirable quali8es associated with an organiza8on or its actors that may influence the organiza8on’s rela8onships with its stakeholders.
§ The Reputa;on Index measures a company’s social reputa8on. § It evaluates cri8cal intangible assets that cons8tute corporate reputa8on.
§ Ra8ng Research, a Bri8sh firm, distributes the index and ra8ngs to interested par8es.
Business Reputa;on
Copyright © 2017 McGraw-‐Hill Educa;on. All rights reserved. No reproduc;on or distribu;on without the prior wriDen consent of McGraw-‐Hill Educa;on.
§ Must meet rigorous, independent social and environmental performance standards.
§ Focus on social responsibility and ci8zenship by blending their social objec8ves with financial goals.
§ B Corpora8on must prove its socially responsible by mee8ng the B Lab standards. § B Lab is a non-‐profit organiza8on that assesses a corpora8on’s social and environmental performance standards.
3-16
The B Corpora;on
Copyright © 2017 McGraw-‐Hill Educa;on. All rights reserved. No reproduc;on or distribu;on without the prior wriDen consent of McGraw-‐Hill Educa;on. 3-17
§ Businesses for Social Responsibility (BSR) survey: § The goal of a global ci8zenship management system is to integrate corporate responsibility and ci8zenship concerns into a company’s values, culture, opera8ons and decisions at all organiza8onal levels.
§ One emerging trend is the consolida8on of corporate ci8zenship efforts. Example: GAP
§ Ci8zenship as an opportunity to: § Create value for their organiza8on § Gain a compe88ve advantage § Help address some of the world’s biggest challenges
Management Systems for Corporate Social Responsibility and Ci;zenship
Copyright © 2017 McGraw-‐Hill Educa;on. All rights reserved. No reproduc;on or distribu;on without the prior wriDen consent of McGraw-‐Hill Educa;on.
Figure 3.5
3-18
Stages of Corporate Ci;zenship
Copyright © 2017 McGraw-‐Hill Educa;on. All rights reserved. No reproduc;on or distribu;on without the prior wriDen consent of McGraw-‐Hill Educa;on. 3-19
§ Social audit: a systema8c evalua8on of an organiza8on’s social, ethical, and environmental performance.
§ 6 Benefit of Social audits by Simon Zadek: § Help businesses know what is happening within their firm § Understand what stakeholders think about and want from the business
§ Tell stakeholders what the business has achieved § Strengthen the loyalty and commitment of stakeholders § Enhance the organiza8on’s decision making § Improve the business’s overall performance
Assessing and Repor;ng Social Performance
Copyright © 2017 McGraw-‐Hill Educa;on. All rights reserved. No reproduc;on or distribu;on without the prior wriDen consent of McGraw-‐Hill Educa;on. 3-20
Three different ways: 1. Companies can develop standards designed to set expecta8ons of performance for themselves or their suppliers or partners. Example: Apple
2. Companies within an industry can agree on a common industry-‐wide standard. Example: EICC
3. Can be developed by global nongovernmental organiza8ons or standard-‐seLng organiza8ons. Example: Interna8onal Organisa8on for Standards, AccountAbility (AA), United Na8ons Global Compact, The Global Repor8ng Ini8a8ve and others.
Social Audit Standards
Copyright © 2017 McGraw-‐Hill Educa;on. All rights reserved. No reproduc;on or distribu;on without the prior wriDen consent of McGraw-‐Hill Educa;on.
§ When a company decides to publicize informa8on collected in a social audit.
§ Transparency: When companies clearly and openly report their performance—financial, social, and environmental.
à Example: § Australia § New Zealand
§ An emerging trend in corporate repor8ng is the integra8on of legally required financial informa8on with social and environmental informa8on into a single integrated report.
3-21
Social Repor;ng
Copyright © 2017 McGraw-‐Hill Educa;on. All rights reserved. No reproduc;on or distribu;on without the prior wriDen consent of McGraw-‐Hill Educa;on. 3-22
Figure 3.6
Trends in Corporate Social Repor;ng