| Instructions: Enter total points possible in cell C12, under the rubric. Next enter scores (between 0 and 4) into yellow cells only in column F. |
| Unit 2 - Grading Rubric 150 points |
| | Unacceptable | Below Average | Average | Above Average | Score | Weight | Final
Score | Comments |
| | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| List the name of a State that is representative of each regulatory model | Does not identify State with regulatory Model | Identifies state with regulatory model but it is inaccurate or incomplete | Identifies state with regulatory model but details are missing | Identifies state with each regulatory model that is accurate and complete | | 10% | 0.00 |
| Evaluate how each model affects the NPs scope of practice? (include, if applicable, the use of protocols, formulary, written agreements, direct versus indirect supervision, referral policy, patient care, review of medical documentation, and payment reimbursement. | Did not evaluate how each model affects the NPs scope of practice. | Eevaluates how each model affects the NPs scope of practice and includes at least 4 of required elements | Evaluates how each model affects the NPs scope of practice and includes at least 5 of required elements | Eevaluates how each model affects the NPs scope of practice and includes all required elements | | 20% | 0.00 |
| How does model of practice serve as a barrier to access to care? | Did not discuss how each model of practice serves as a barrier to access to care | Vaguely discussed how each model of practice serves as a barrier to access to care | Discussed how each model of practice serves as a barrier to access to care but left out relevant details | Thoroughly discussed how each model of practice serves as a barrier to access to care | 4 | 20% | 0.80 |
| Compare/contrast the prescriptive privileges of each model and example State | Did not compare/contrast NP prescriptive privileges of each model and example State | Compared NP prescriptive privileges of one of the models and example States | Compared NP prescriptive privileges of two of the models and example States | Compared NP prescriptive privileges of all the models and example States | | 20% | 0.00 |
| Compare/ Contrast how each model impacts payer status for the NP | Did not compare/ Contrast how each model impacts payer status for the NP | Compare/ Contrast how one model impacts payer status for the NP | Compare/ Contrast how two models impact payer status for the NP | Compare/ Contrast how all of the models impact payer status for the NP | | 20% | 0.00 |
| Resources | Does not include any resources (0) or sources utilized are not relevant and credible sources of information(1). | Not all sources utilized are relevant and/or credible and/or does not meet the required number of sources. | Supports many opinions and ideas with relevant and credible sources of information; meets the required number and types of resources. | Supports opinions and ideas with relevant and credible sources of information; meets or exceeds the required number and types of resources. | | 10% | 0.00 |
| | | | | | | 100% | 0.80 |
| Appropriate citations are defined for this course as evidence-based on research, published within last 5 years, peer-reviewed, and from
a publication or internet site that targets professional healthcare providers and lists references. Course textbook is not used in case studies. | | | | | Final Score | | 30 |
| | | | | | Percentage | | 20.00% |
| Total available points = | | 150 | 4 |
| Rubric Score | | Grade points | | Percentage |
| Low | High | Low | High | Low | High |
| 3.5 | 4.0 | 135 | 150 | 90% | 100% |
| 2.5 | 3.49 | 120 | 135 | 80% | 89.99% |
| 1.7 | 2.49 | 105 | 120 | 70% | 79.99% |
| 1.0 | 1.69 | 90 | 105 | 60% | 69.99% |
| 0.0 | 1.00 | 0 | 90 | 0 | 59.99% |
gengri
unit_2_gr.rubric.xls
