|
Assignment 3
|
|
Criteria
|
Ratings
|
Pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSelection of article
view longer description
|
|
Student selected a peer-reviewed academic article in the history field or in a closely related field
5.0 pts
|
Student chose a text that was not a peer-reviewed academic article in the history field
0.0 pts
|
|
5.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentification
view longer description
|
|
Student informed reader of what the text was titled, who wrote it, when and where it was published, and what it was about
10.0 pts
|
Student provides some information on the article, but crucial information is left out or the student made significant errors
5.0 pts
|
Student failed to complete this part of the assignment
0.0 pts
|
|
10.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThesis/Argument
view longer description
|
|
Student correctly identifies the author's argument, including its specific focus and limits
15.0 pts
|
Student identifies the general topic and direction of the article, but neglects the specific such as limits and focus
10.0 pts
|
Student identifies topic, but fails to identify argument or misidentifies argument
5.0 pts
|
Student failed to complete this part of the assignment
0.0 pts
|
|
15.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDebate
view longer description
|
|
Student identifies the broader debate that the author engages and explains how the article fits into that debate
15.0 pts
|
Student identifies a debate that the author engages, but does not explain well how the article contributes to that debate
10.0 pts
|
Student identifies a topic rather than a debate, and.or student misidentifies the debate that the author is trying to engage with
5.0 pts
|
Student failed to complete this part of the assignment
0.0 pts
|
|
15.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources
view longer description
|
|
Student identifies specific sources and/or specific kinds of sources that the author uses; student discusses the advantages and disadvantages of using these kinds of sources
15.0 pts
|
Student identifies sources in general terms (primary vs. secondary, for example); student may or may not discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using these sources
10.0 pts
|
Student identifies the sources in general terms and does not discuss the advantages of using particular kinds of sources; or student misidentifies the sources being used
5.0 pts
|
Student failed to complete this part of the assignment
0.0 pts
|
|
15.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStrengths & Weakneses
view longer description
|
|
Student identifies one strength and one weakness of the article (argument, sources, methods) and explains clearly how these strengths and weaknesses affect the value of the article
15.0 pts
|
Student identifies one strength and one weakness of the article, but may not provide a clear explanation of how they affect the value of the article
10.0 pts
|
Student identifies one strength or one weakness, but is very vague both in identifying this strength or weakness and explaining why it is important.
5.0 pts
|
Student failed to complete this part of the assignment
0.0 pts
|
|
15.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConcluding Meditation & Question
view longer description
|
|
Student answers all questions posed in part 6 of the assignment and provides an historical question that could serve as the basis for further exploration of the article's topic
15.0 pts
|
Student answers all questions posed in part 6 of the assignment, but provides a question that is not historical or that is normative rather than analytic
10.0 pts
|
Student fails to answer one or more of the questions posed in part 6
5.0 pts
|
Student failed to complete this part of the assignment
0.0 pts
|
|
15.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFootnoting
view longer description
|
|
Student cites his/her sources using properly-formatted footnotes
5.0 pts
|
Student fails to use footnotes, uses them inappropriately and/or does not use a proper footnoting format
0.0 pts
|
|
5.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar & Style
view longer description
|
|
Paper is written in academic style and grammar and spelling errors are kept to a minimum
5.0 pts
|
Paper is composed in an informal or nonacademic style and/or spelling and grammar errors interfere with the reader's ability to understand the text
0.0 pts
|
|
5.0 pts
|
|
Total Points: 100.
|