journal

profileAsjb7
evaluating_and_rewarding_teams-1.pptx

Evaluating and rewarding teams

Chapter 16

Evaluating and rewarding teams

An important way to motivate teams is through performance evaluation and reward programs

Performance evaluations communicate to the team how well it is performing

The information may be used to provide direction, motivate performance, and inform the organization’s reward system

Team members should participate in the evaluation process

Organizations can use combinations of individual, team, and organizational rewards to motivate teams

Team performance evaluations

Organizations may evaluate individual team members, the operation of the entire team, or combinations of individual and team

Performance evaluation measures need to be specific and clear, identified in advance, and related to behaviors under members’ control

Performance evaluations are valuable for providing feedback to employees, motivating them, and supporting training and development

Types of evaluations

Traditional individual evaluations- supervisor appraises an individual employee. This evaluation is tied to the organization’s compensation system

Team member evaluations-team members instead of a supervisor conduct the performance evaluations

Evaluation of the team-work of a team is highly interdependent. It may be impossible to evaluate employees individually, the supervisor instead of team members evaluates the operation of the entire team

Types of evaluations

There are several factors that affect which type of performance evaluation is appropriate for a circumstance

From a teamwork perspective, the most important factor is work design

Individual evaluations are more important for individual work assignments

When work is highly interdependent or conducted primarily as a team, individual evaluation approaches are not appropriate and may discourage cooperation in the team

Types of measures

The key to developing a good measurement system is making certain that it captures both team and organizational goals

It is necessary to ensure the measurements relate to factors that the team has the ability to influence

Measures should focus on the results of the team’s performance, not on the internal activities of the team

Performance evaluations are improved when specific, quantifiable goals are set for the team, and these are identified in advance

Types of measures

It is useful to include team members in the development of the performance evaluation system

Many performance evaluations systems fail because the measures are vague or poorly defined

One alternative is using behavioral measures versus the results of performance

Behavioral performance measures can be used for any type of job, the rater can deal with factors outside the employee’s control, they can encourage positive employee behaviors that are not directly related to the job

Types of measures

A team performance measurement system contains 5 to 10 different measures

It is preferable to have a simpler system team members can relate to, rather than a sophisticated system that is hard to interpret

Using behavioral scales encourages the rater to focus on the target’s behavior rather than on personality

Including team members in the development of behavioral scales is a good way to improve the relevance and credibility of the evaluation system

Participation in the evaluation process

It is a difficult for a supervisor to conduct a performance evaluation on someone who works on a team

Teamwork often requires a shift to the use of multirater evaluation approaches, such as 360-degree feedback, that include input from team members, customers, and supervisors

The most qualified to evaluate a team member’s performance are the fellow team members

Multirater performance evaluations are more reliable and valid than supervisor-only evaluations

Problems and biases with team evaluations

Inflation bias- positive evaluations given when raters expect to have to present feedback to others. Inflation comes from both empathy and fear of creating conflict in the team

Reciprocity bias- people feel obligated to give positive ratings after they have received positive ratings from others

Team Halo Effect- when teams are successful, team members view success as caused by the team; when they are unsuccessful, they tend to blame individual members for the failure

Reward systems

Team rewards have the potential to influence the motivation of individual team members, the level of coordination in the team, and the quality of the group process

An organization needs to change its compensation practices to support teamwork, because pay is a communication device that tells employees what is important

As organizations become more team oriented, existing compensation practices either get in the way or are modified to support the use of teams

Reward systems

The three approaches to rewarding performance are individual, team, and organizational

Individual reward systems are good for motivating high performers but may discourage cooperation and teamwork

Team and organizational approaches are better at encouraging teamwork and are appropriate when the tasks are highly interdependent

Most US employees prefer individual rather than team based awards

Reward systems

Hybrid Approaches

In some studies, teams that are rewarded for a mix of individual and team performance perform better than teams rewarded solely for individual or team performance

May create a social dilemma for team members (should they act for the team or their individual self-interest?)

The best approach may depend on the type of tasks the team is performing

Team and organizational reward systems

Team rewards are based on successful team performance

The effectiveness of team reward programs depends on the characteristics of the rewards, the organization, and the team

Team rewards should be large enough to make a noticeable difference in the member’s pay; they are often assumed to be about 10% of the salary

To encourage cooperation, rewards should be distributed equally among all team members

Effective team rewards require clear team goals, measurable performance standards, and a task that requires integrated teamwork

Team and organizational reward systems

Recognition awards are one-time events that acknowledge team and individual success

Recognition awards may be cash or non-cash

Survey show that about 1/3 of large US companies use recognition awards to reward successful team performance

Non-cash awards should be appropriate for specific employees and given in a manner that publicly recognizes team accomplishments

Cash awards should be large enough to have an impact

Awards should be given as close as possible to the time of team success

Team and organizational reward systems

A potential problem with team incentive programs is that they may inadvertently create competition among teams within an organization

Profit-sharing programs are based on meeting profitability targets for the organization

Gain-sharing programs link pay to collective results at a level smaller than the entire organization (may be linked to the performance of a specific facility or production unit)

Relationship of rewards to types of teams

The reward program an organization uses to support teamwork depends on the type of team being rewarded

Parallel teams are typically part-time, temporary teams that supplement the regular work system and perform problem solving and improvement functions

There is an inherent conflict between commitment to the team’s task and commitment to the member’s primary job functions

Relationship of rewards to types of teams

Process, or work team, is a full-time permanent team that is a major part of the members’ work

Process or work teams are responsible for producing a product or providing a service

Process teams are used by 78% of large US companies

Project teams are typically composed of a diverse group of knowledge workers who come together to perform a project in a defined period

Linking rewards to types of teams

Parallel teams do well with team recognition rewards as well as organizational rewards

Process teams do well with salary based compensation, skill-based pay, and individual, team, and organizational rewards

Project teams do well with team recognition rewards and team and organizational rewards

Project teams may be the most difficult type of team to reward (team membership may change during the project)