week 2
PLANNING PROCESS FOR INNOVATION 2
Introduction
Most successful businesses recognize the value of innovation and as a result have
managed to stay ahead of the competition in their respective industries. The success of most
organizations largely depends on the development of new ideas and implementing them
effectively (Jefferson, 1973). Innovation being a critical area, it needs to be well planned to
ensure success in implementing new ideas. Most businesses are unsuccessful with innovation,
because they lack a formalized process for such organizational initiatives.
Evaluation of the Firm
The product the organization offers should be significantly evaluated in terms of how it
can profitably impact the organization. The product should meet or exceed the expectations of
the customers. It is important to note that not all ideas are worth implementing, and there is the
need for screening to identify what ideas need to be adopted and what ideas need to be dropped
(Heshmati & Lenz-Cesar, 2015). In the process of screening, the organization is able to identify
what factors can speed up the innovation process and those that block the implementation, and as
a response, lays out measures to counter the factors that are likely to lead to failure of a bright
innovative idea.
Organizations looking forward to building a robust culture can establish a few best
practices in evaluating the firm. The first step is to ensure employees have a number of
effectively recognized platforms to receive the advocacy and feedback of the idea (Jefferson,
1973). The second step is for the organization to recognize and understand the difficulties
- 2 -
1
2
3
1. Most successful
businesses recognize the
value of innovation and as
a result have
managed to stay ahead of
the competition in their
respective industries. The
success of most
organizations largely
depends on the
development of new ideas
and implementing them
effectively (Jefferson,
1973). Innovation being a
critical area, it needs to be
well planned to
ensure success in
implementing new ideas.
Most businesses are
unsuccessful with
innovation,
because they lack a
formalized process for such
organizational initiatives.
Introduction (Include this
Introduction Paragraph in
each Weekly Assignment)
Name of the organization
Organization Mission
Statement Industry
Specialization Geographical
regions of location
Management of Technology &
Innovation (M.T.I.) current
state and future growth
directions [Corey Thomas]
2. Evaluation of the Firm
this should be a level-1 (main)
heading ... center-justified
[Corey Thomas]
3. The product the organization offers should be significantly evaluated
in terms of how it
can profitably impact the organization. The product should meet or
exceed the expectations of
the customers. It is important to note that not all ideas are worth
implementing, and there is the
need for screening to identify what ideas need to be adopted and what
ideas need to be dropped
(Heshmati & Lenz-Cesar, 2015). In the process of screening, the
organization is able to identify what factors can speed up the
innovation process and those that block the implementation, and as a
response, lays out measures to counter the factors that are likely to
lead to failure of a bright
- 2 (cont) -
innovative idea.
I'm assuming this is "Demand for the Product"???
You need a level-2 heading (subheading) to identify coverage
of this factor [Corey Thomas]
PLANNING PROCESS FOR INNOVATION 3
involved in evaluating innovative ideas, and finally, the firm needs to build transparent
evaluation and screening protocols.
When evaluating the firm and its products, it is crucial to recognize what are likely to be
the competitive responses of other organizations in relation to the implementation of the idea.
The impacts of reaction of other organizations need to also be taken into consideration as they
might damage either the innovative idea, or affect the whole firm.
The commercialization aims to create the value of an idea by emphasizing on its potential
impact on the market. This process makes the idea appealing to its target audiences, like
packaging the idea with others and clarifying when and how an idea can be used to assess its
benefits. This step comes with its benefits, such as identifying other key opportunities in the
process, such as better impactful ideas or how the existing idea can be modified (Heshmati &
Lenz-Cesar, 2015).
Ideas are also evaluated from the perspective of the firm to identify their suitability in the
process of implementation. Some ideas might be ahead of time, while others exceed the
capabilities of the organization when it comes to adopting them (Jefferson, 1973). The
experimentation of an idea gives a business the opportunity of generating new ideas due to the
information gathered in that process. In the implementation phase, the organization needs to
make choices on how to act on these goals and objectives. Some goals and objectives require
more effort to achieve, while some goals and objectives are more important than others (White &
Bruton, 2011).
The McFarlan and McKenney – The Strategic Grid
- 3 -
1
2
3
1. When evaluating the firm
and its products, it is
crucial to recognize what
are likely to be
the competitive responses
of other organizations in
relation to the
implementation of the idea.
The impacts of reaction of
other organizations need to
also be taken into
consideration as they
might damage either the
innovative idea, or affect
the whole firm.
"Likelihood of Strong
Competitive Response "????
You need a level-2 heading
(subheading) to identify
coverage of this factor
What information do you
have that supports this idea?
Explore the library to find
reliable resources, such as
quotes and data, to help
prove your point and
strengthen your argument.
To add validity to your
argument this statement
needs to be further supported
by a reliable outside source
such as a peer-reviewed
article or statistic from a
trusted agency.
Include supporting details and
examples to add validity to
your claims. For additional
information, please visit the
'Writing Center & Library' link
in your course where you will
find the Writing Resources
tab. Click on the "How to
Write a Good Paragraph" link.
[Corey Thomas] 2. The commercialization aims to create the value of an idea by
emphasizing on its potential impact on the market. This process makes
the idea appealing to its target audiences, like
packaging the idea with others and clarifying when and how an idea can
be used to assess its
benefits. This step comes with its benefits, such as identifying other
key opportunities in the
process, such as better impactful ideas or how the existing idea can be
modified (Heshmati &
Lenz-Cesar, 2015).
Cost Factors in Commercialization Resources Available for
Commercialization ??????
You need a level-2 heading (subheading) to identify coverage of the factor
- 3 (cont) -
[Corey Thomas]
3. The McFarlan and McKenney – The Strategic Grid
this should also be a level-1 heading and center-justified
[Corey Thomas]
PLANNING PROCESS FOR INNOVATION 4
The grid suggests that it is significantly important to assess a company at any given point
to determine how it is putting its IT to good use. IT can be used to support or improve the current
operations, as it might play a vital role in data processing, which is the better alternative to the
manual methods of processing data and information (Corboy, 2007). IT helps an organization to
accurately see its future from its current operations by establishing models that are effective in
planning, or forecasting business activities and results (Mohtashami et al., 2016).
McFarlan & McKenney (1983) came up with a suitable grid that is useful in assessing an
organization’s use of IT.
Potential strategic impact of the future information
LOW HIGH
Strategic impact LOW
of current
information system
HIGH
1. Low Current: low future impact – IT has minimal relevance on the future of the
organization and only supports the current processes.
Support Turnaround
Factory Strategic
- 4 -
1
1. Potential strategic impact
of the future information
You were to identify the
McFarlan & McKenney
Strategic Grid quadrant that
applies best to your
organization (you make no
mention of your organization
in your paper)! [Corey
Thomas]
PLANNING PROCESS FOR INNOVATION 5
2. Low current: high future impact – IT will be more helpful in the future business
agendas. Here, the organization clearly believes IT has a significant role to play in
the future endeavors of the business operations.
3. High current: low future impact – IT is said to have a factory role on the business.
Therefore, IT is critical in the day-to-day operations of the business, but it is not
substantially felt that there are major developments that fundamentally affect the
nature of the business. Therefore, the primary issue is in the maintenance of the
existing systems.
4. High current: high future impact – here, IT plays a significant role in altering the
current operations and the IT developments shaping up the future business
activities of the organization. The mission of IT is critical at this stage, and the
organization highly relies on different aspects of the system to deliver its products
and services both in the present, and in the future.
- 5 -
[no notes on this page]
PLANNING PROCESS FOR INNOVATION 6
References
Corboy, M. (2007, May 10). Strategic Planning Models. Retrieved from ACAA Global website:
http://www.accaglobal.com/content/dam/acca/global/PDF-students/2012s/Strategic
%20planning%20models.pdf
Heshmati, A., & Lenz-Cesar, F. (2015). Policy simulation of firms’ cooperation in
innovation. Research Evaluation, 24(3), 293-311. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvv011
Jefferson, R. (1973). Planning and the Innovation Process. Progress In Planning, 1, 233-312.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0305-9006(73)90004-4
Mohtashami, S., Pudjianto, D., & Strbac, G. (2016). Strategic Distribution Network Planning
With Smart Grid Technologies. IEEE Transactions On Smart Grid, 1-1.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/tsg.2016.2533421
White, M.A, & Bruton, G.D. (2011). The management of technology & innovation: A strategic
approach (2nd ed.). Mason, OH: South-Western/ Cengage Learning.
- 6 -
1
1. Jefferson, R. (1973).
Planning and the
Innovation Process.
Progress In Planning, 1,
233-312.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/03
05-9006(73)90004-4
The source you have used is
outdated. Be sure to focus
your research on things that
have been published within
the last five to ten years,
unless referring to seminal
works or thinkers. [Corey
Thomas]