Phase 5: Developing a Care Plan
Week 6 Assignment 2 Rubric
|
|
Unsatisfactory 1 |
Emerging 2 |
Proficient 3 |
Exemplary 4 |
Score |
|
Assignment Components |
|||||
|
Applied Mobilize, Assess, Plan, Implement, Track (MAP-IT) in the assessment process. |
MAP-IT is not reflected in the assessment process. |
Few MAP-IT aspects applied to the assessment process. |
MAP-IT applied to the assessment process with missing elements. |
Clearly applied MAP- IT in the assessment process. |
[Score x 6 = 24 pts] |
|
Identified priority nursing diagnosis. |
Lack of nursing diagnosis. |
Identified nursing diagnosis but not the priority. |
Identified priority nursing diagnosis but explanation is poorly worded. |
Identified priority nursing diagnosis and explanation is accurately worded. |
[Score x 7 = 28 pts] |
|
Identified appropriate strategies to address nursing diagnosis and identified risks of aggregate. |
Lack of strategies to address nursing diagnosis. |
Identified strategies but lacking areas to comprehensively address nursing diagnosis. |
Identified appropriate strategies to address nursing diagnosis but the explanation is poorly worded. |
Identified strategies to thoroughly address nursing diagnosis as well as identified risks. The explanation is accurately worded. |
[Score x 7 = 28 pts] |
|
Created a disaster management plan with at least two disasters addressed following the assignment criteria. |
Lack of a disaster management plan. |
Identified one disaster. |
Identified at least two disasters but lacking a plan to manage the disasters. |
Identified at least two disasters that may affect the aggregate and recommended a management plan and the items for disaster supplies kit. |
[Score x 7 = 28 pts] |
|
Cited at least two journal articles as references for ideas in |
Cited one source and it was not a journal article. |
Cited two sources but they were not journal articles. |
Cited one source that was a journal article. |
Cited two journal articles. |
[Score x 3 = 12 pts] |
NOTE: If a component is absent, student receives a zero for that component.
Page 1 of 3
NSG4075 Capstone
© 2013 South University
|
the plan. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Written Components |
|||||
|
Organization Introduction Thesis Transitions Conclusion |
Introduction is limited or missing entirely.
The paper lacks a thesis statement.
Transitions are infrequent, illogical, or missing entirely.
Conclusion is limited or missing entirely. |
Introduction is present but incomplete or underdeveloped.
The paper is loosely organized around a thesis that may have to be inferred.
Transitions are sporadic.
Conclusion is present, but incomplete or underdeveloped. |
Introduction has a clear opening, provides background information, and states the topic.
The paper is organized around an arguable, clearly stated thesis statement.
Transitions are appropriate and help the flow of ideas.
Conclusion summarizes main argument and has a clear ending. |
Introduction catches the reader’s attention, provides compelling and appropriate background info, and clearly states the topic.
The paper is well organized around an arguable, focused thesis.
Thoughtful transitions clearly show how ideas relate.
Conclusion leaves the reader with a sense of closure and provides concluding insights. |
[Score x 4 = 16 pts] |
|
Usage and Mechanics Grammar Spelling Sentence structure |
Writing contains numerous errors in spelling, grammar, and/or sentence structure that severely interferes with readability and comprehension. |
Errors in spelling and grammar exist that somewhat interfere with readability and/or comprehension. |
Writing follows conventions of spelling and grammar throughout. Errors are infrequent and do not interfere with readability or comprehension. |
The paper is basically error free in terms of mechanics. Grammar and mechanics help establish a clear idea and aid the reader in following the writer’s logic. |
[Score x 3 = 12 pts] |
|
APA Elements Attribution Paraphrasing Quotations |
No attempt at APA format. |
APA format is attempted to paraphrase, quote, and cite, but errors are significant. |
Using APA format, accurately paraphrased, quoted, and cited in many spots throughout when appropriate or called for. Errors present are somewhat minor. |
Using APA format, accurately paraphrased, quoted, and cited throughout the presentation when appropriate or called for. Only a few minor errors present. |
[Score x 3 = 12 pts] |
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
Timeliness |
|
|
|
|
Late Work Penalty: |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Score |
/ 160 |