Organizational change
3-*
Implementing Organizational Change: Theory into Practice
Bert Spector
Chapter 3
Mutual Engagement
and Shared Diagnosis
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Learning Objectives
- Describe the role of diagnosis in assessing behaviors and values and in creating dissatisfaction with the status quo.
- Discuss the use of a systemic framework for guiding diagnosis.
- Explore ways to overcome the “climate of silence” that blocks mutual engagement.
- Provide the key ingredients of a diagnostic intervention.
- Define the role played by after-action reviews in created quick learning and improvement.
3-*
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
*
Building a Vocabulary
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
3-*
Learning is the process by which individuals receive data from the external environment, analyze that data, and adjust their thinking and behaviors accordingly.
“Don’t expect formulas and solutions that have worked in the past and are imposed on the current situation to work for your organization.”
Diagnosis: process of learning about the dynamics of the organization in order to take action intended to improve performance
Diagnostic framework: a roadmap to analyzing alignment that makes explicit both the key elements of an organization that need to be aligned and the interconnections and interdependencies among those elements
3-*
Building a Vocabulary
“The most effective change implementation starts with a
diagnosis that is shared by many employees at
multiple organizational levels.”
“Use a common organizational framework to shape
mutual engagement and shared diagnosis”
“Use diagnosis as the preliminary stage in implementing change.”
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
*
Building a Vocabulary
Dialogue: involves a structured, collective discussion among two or more parties without a predetermined outcome
Organizational silence: the lack of truthful dialogue in organizations
3-*
“Don’t mistake passive acceptance with agreement. ”
“Leaders can ask themselves—has their organization bred a ‘climate of silence’ that discourages subordinates from speaking up and discourages bosses from seeking feedback? ”
“A large power distance between parties in a dialogue inhibits openness and risk taking while distorting communications.”
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
*
Power Equalization Steps
3-*
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
| Steps | Leads to |
| Delayering | Removing hierarchical barriers that create and distort communication |
| Decentralizing | Pushing down decision making to close the gap between decision makers and doers |
| Egalitarianism | Removing “artifacts” of status differentials |
| Third-party Facilitation | Structuring effective “rules-of-engagement” around feedback and dialogue |
| Representation | Inserting voice from multiple levels, both vertical (managers, shop floor employees, etc.) and horizontal (union and management, various functions, etc.) into dialogue |
| Teamwork | Building shared purpose and mutual responsibility to ensure equal participation and influence by all members in dialogue |
*
Building a Vocabulary
Psychological safety: a belief on the part of employees that the organizational climate is conducive for taking personal risks, especially around dialogue.
“Instead of committing to solutions, leaders can commit to a process of mutual engagement and learning, thus inviting employees at all levels to cross barriers of silence and participate in a dialogue.”
3-*
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
*
3-*
Building a Vocabulary
Consultant: an individual possessing a broad range of diagnostic and developmental skills who contracts with the organization’s leaders to facilitate an intervention.
“Leaders can call on a consultant to introduce and teach skills required of mutual engagement and diagnosis.”
“Consultants may arrive from outside the organization: professional consultants or academics with a specialization in organizational
change and development. They may also come from within the firm: specially trained employees, often within the company’s human resource or organization development staff. Whether internal or external, the task of the consultant is the same: to facilitate diagnosis and dialogue and to do so in a way that allows employees to develop those skills themselves.”
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Principles for Organizational Diagnosis
3-*
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
| Systemic Focus | Targets the entire organization and guided by a framework that focuses on interactions |
| Consultant Facilitated | Specially trained individual(s) bring external perspective and required skills |
| Client-Oriented | Employees participate in all stages as full partners in order to build commitment and competency |
| Data-Based | Participants agree on the validity and strategic importance of data collected about performance |
| Honest Conversation | Employees engage the requirements of shared dialogue: mutuality, reciprocity, advocacy, and inquiry |
| Psychological Safety | Active steps taken to overcome climate of organizational silence |
*
Data Collection Methods
Questionnaires: self-administered paper-and-pencil
data collection forms, often stressing areas of
behavioral interaction such as communications, goals,
and coordination
Advantages:
Reach large numbers of employees
Fast
Anonymous
Used for benchmarking
Disadvantages
Based on preconceived ideas
Can oversimplify complex issues
Does not expose root causes
Does not create commitment or motivation
3-*
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
“Be careful about the overuse of employee questionnaires in collecting data about organizational effectiveness. They can be useful for measurement purpose but do not create mutual engagement.”
*
Data Collection Methods
Diagnostic interviews: a form of data collection in
which a trained diagnostician meets with an employee,
or small groups of employees, to solicit information
pertaining to the performance of the organization
Advantages:
Collect rich data
Begins process of dialogue
Teaches communication skills
Disadvantages:
Requires investment in training interviewers
Data hard to summarize or quantify
Lacks anonymity
3-*
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
“Use diagnostic interviews and behavioral observation to
collect rich and valid data about how employees behave and how the organization functions.”
*
Data Collection Methods
Behavioral observation: a form of data collection
in which a trained diagnostician can watch actual
behaviors of employees
Advantages:
Work-based behavior as data
Data rich and deep on interactions
Reveals underlying emotions
Disadvantages:
Observation will impact behaviors
Time consuming
Requires highly skilled observers
3-*
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
*
Building a Vocabulary
Discovery: the process of analyzing and making sense of data that has been collected as part of an organizational diagnosis
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
3-*
“Mutual engagement in the discovery stage will help both to assure the validity of the conclusions and build commitment to corrective actions.”
Building a Vocabulary
Closing the Loop
Feedback: the process of receiving
information focused on the effectiveness of
one’s actions and performance.
“Mutual engagement can be enhanced when top management feeds back to employees what it has learned from the diagnostic process and uses that feedback as an opportunity to generate more learning.”
3-*
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
*
Building a Vocabulary
After-action review: an organized, disciplined
approach to shared diagnosis and mutual dialogue in
the immediate aftermath of a specific action or event.
“After-action reviews provided an opportunity for a sharply focused and timely mutual engagement that can lead to quick corrections.”
3-*
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
*
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Printed in the United States of America.
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
3-16