mgmt110_ethics_assignment.docx
https://www.scu.edu/ethics/ethics-resources/ethical-decision-making/a-framework-for-ethical-decision-making/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xwOCmJevigw#action=share
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=JdtWu4Cqx1Y
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=O--AFCI4HCU#!
Part 2: After the class debate, you are required to write a 2-3 page reflective paper on the following topics.
· Summarize your assigned ethical position.
· What did you learn from the discussion?
· What position do you personally hold on this topic?
· What ethical theory is it most similar to?
The below rubric will be used in grading your paper:
MGMT110 Ethics Grading Rubric (AB)
|
Assignment requirements
|
Excellent
|
Good
|
Needs Improvement
|
Weak
|
|
Development
Max. 1 point
|
Relevant and varied kinds of supporting details clearly focused on thesis. Evidence is persuasive and detailed.
1.0
|
Relevant evidence but not always effectively explained or analyzed. Appropriate examples but may lack depth.
.75
|
Evidence is too general or lacks connection to the thesis. Insufficient analysis or superficial examples.
.50
|
Evidence is off topic or missing. Few examples, facts, statistics or expert opinion that develop thesis or support the argument.
.25
|
|
Critical Analysis
Max. 1 point
|
Sophisticated understanding and insightful analysis of topic. Fresh perspective on topic. Insightful application of ethical theories.
1.0
|
Some insightful and thoughtful analysis of topic. Ideas are clear, but analysis may be general. Ethical theories adequately applied.
.75
|
Analysis is superficial, underdeveloped or repetitive. Some ethical theories mentioned, but not sufficiently applied to analysis.
.50
|
Little or no depth or understanding of topic. Essay is more of report than an analysis. Little to no ethical theory used to analyze the topic.
.25
|
|
Logic and Organization
Max. 1 point
|
Paragraphs are logically and persuasively organized to provide a coherent and unified argument for the thesis.
1.0
|
Each paragraph has a topic sentence. Organization is logical and easy to follow but may follow a formulaic structure.
.75
|
Some parag. may lack a topic sentence or a point that supports the thesis or drift off topic. TSs are rather week for most of them.
.50
|
Little or no logic in paragraph organization. Paragraphs may be unrelated to one another or do not support thesis.
.25
|
|
Conclusion
Max. 1 point
|
Insightful, thought-provoking, and reflective
comments.
1.0
|
Developed and thoughtful if not keenly perceptive
.75
|
Underdeveloped. Simple summary of essay’s ideas.
.50
|
Overly brief or missing. Simply repeating thesis.
.25
|
|
Development
|
|
Weak
0.25points
|
Needs Improvement
0.5points
|
Good
0.75points
|
Excellent
1points
|
|
|
Critical Analysis
|
|
Weak
0.25points
|
Needs Improvement
0.5points
|
Good
0.75points
|
Excellent
1points
|
|
|
Logic & Organization
|
|
Weak
0.25points
|
Needs Improvement
0.5points
|
Good
0.75points
|
Excellent
1points
|
|
|
Conclusion
|
|
Weak
0.25points
|
Needs Improvement
0.5points
|
Good
0.75points
|
Excellent
1points
|
|
Calluvforlife
