Assignment
Deconstruction of Literature
|
|
1 Unsatisfactory 0.00% |
2 Less than Satisfactory 74.00% |
3 Satisfactory 79.00% |
4 Good 87.00% |
5 Excellent 100.00% |
|
|
80.0 %Content |
|
|||||
|
20.0 %Summarize Introduction |
Description of the purpose, intent, and scope of the study is either not complete or not clear. |
Description of the purpose, intent, and scope of the study is vague and/or insufficiently developed. |
The reader is able to glean the purpose, intent, and scope of the study with effort. |
The description of the purpose, intent, and scope of the study, is detailed. |
The description of the purpose, intent, and scope of the study, is comprehensive and from current literature. |
|
|
20.0 %Summarize Methodology |
Description of the research design, population sample, data collection, and other procedures used in the study is either not complete or not clear. |
Description of the research design, population sample, data collection, and other procedures used in the study is vague and/or insufficiently developed. |
The reader is able to glean the research design, population sample, data collection, and other procedures used in the study with effort. |
The description of the research design, population sample, data collection, and other procedures used in the study, is detailed. |
The description of the research design, population sample, data collection, and other procedures used in the study, is comprehensive and from current literature. |
|
|
20.0 %Summarize Results |
Description of the data collected and the findings of the study is either not complete or not clear. |
Description of the data collected and the findings of the study is vague and/or insufficiently developed. |
The reader is able to glean data collected and the findings of the study with effort. |
The description data collected and the findings of the study, is detailed. |
The description of the data collected and the findings of the study, is comprehensive and from current literature. |
|
|
20.0 %Summarize Conclusion |
Critique of the presentation of the study and a summary assessment of the study are either not complete or not clear. |
Critique of the presentation of the study and a summary assessment of the study are vague and/or insufficiently developed. |
The reader is able to glean the critique of the study and the summary assessment of the study with effort. |
The critique of the study and the summary assessment of the study are detailed. |
The critique of the study and the summary assessment of the study are comprehensive and from current literature. |
|
|
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness |
|
|||||
|
20.0 %Mechanics of Writing |
Mechanical errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. |
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. |
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. |
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. |
The writer is clearly in command of standard, written academic English. |
|
|
100 %Total Weightage |
|
|
|
|
|
|