Risk Management research
|
Category |
Excellent – 9 pts |
Good –8 pts |
Acceptable –6 pts |
Unacceptable – 1 pt |
|
Content |
Content and purpose is clear for all potential audiences – jargon is minimal or clearly explained |
Content and purpose is mostly clear for all potential audiences – jargon is not clearly explained |
Content and purpose is either not clear for all potential audiences and/or there is overuse of jargon |
Content and purpose is unclear |
|
Grammar |
Throughout the paper, wording is precise and unambiguous. Sentence structure is consistently clear and lucid. Proper citation structure is used. Minimal to no grammatical errors |
Paper is for the most part precisely worded and unambiguous. Sentence structure is mostly clear. Citations are used effectively. Almost no grammatical errors. |
Wording is imprecise or often ambiguous. Sentence structure is confusing. Citations are either missing or used improperly. There are noticeable grammatical errors
|
Consistent poor wording and sentence structure throughout the paper. Sentence structure is often confusing. There are a preponderance of grammatical errors. |
|
Use of Outside Sources |
There are multiple sources cited to support the purpose of the paper. |
There are adequate sources cited to support the purpose of the paper. |
Sources are lacking or inadequate to support the purpose of the paper. |
Purpose of the paper is not supported by outside sources. |
|
Grasp of concept |
Paper goes beyond the assignment to explore the implications of the subject matter in new contexts or in particularly insightful and/or original ways. |
Paper fully explores the parameters of the assignment but does not extend them. |
Paper does not adequately address the topic selected for the assignment. Paper demonstrates a shaky grasp of issues related to the topic. |
Paper does not address the topic. |
|
Conclusion |
Elegantly synthesizes and reframes key points from the paper. Presented as an “executive summary” |
Synthesizes and brings closure but does not examine new perspectives or questions. Presented as an “executive summary” |
Restates the same points as made in the initial statement or introduction to the topic. Not presented as an “executive summary” |
Is missing or cursory in nature. |