Information Literacy Assignment

Peer Reviewed Journals: The Creation of New Knowledge

Idea

Lit Review

Grant

Research

Interpret Data

Conferences

Write Manuscript

Submit

Peer Review

Publication

Idea

Lit Review

Grant

Research

Interpret Data

Conferences

Write Manuscript

Submit

Peer Review

Publication

The Peer Review

process begins with a

researcher and a new

idea

Idea

Lit Review

Grant

Research

Collect Data

Conferences

Write Manuscript

Submit

Peer Review

Publication

The researcher

reviews the

“literature” of her/his

field to see what else

has been done on

the topic

Idea

Lit Review

Grant

Research

Interpret Data

Conferences

Write Manuscript

Submit

Peer Review

Publication

A researcher may

secure funding to

help pay for her/his

research

Idea

Lit Review

Grant

Research

Interpret Data

Conferences

Write Manuscript

Submit

Peer Review

Publication

Conducting the

actual research can

be an involved and

time consuming

process

Idea

Lit Review

Grant

Research

Interpret Data

Conferences

Write Manuscript

Submit

Peer Review

Publication

Gathering, analyzing,

and interpreting the

data is where much of

the thought in

research occurs

Idea

Lit Review

Grant

Research

Interpret Data

Conferences

Write Manuscript

Submit

Peer Review

Publication

Researchers often

present preliminary

findings at

conferences. These

can provide good

feedback too

Idea

Lit Review

Grant

Research

InterpretData

Conferences

Write Manuscript

Submit

Peer Review

Publication

With the input from

the conference, the

researcher will

prepare her/his

findings for

publication

Idea

Lit Review

Grant

Research

Interpret Data

Conferences

Write Manuscript

Submit

Peer Review

Publication

The manuscript is

sent to the editor of a

suitable journal

Idea

Lit Review

Grant

Research

InterpretData

Conferences

Write Manuscript

Submit

Peer Review

Publication

Experts on the topic

review the manuscript

(More about this in a

moment)

Idea

Lit Review

Grant

Research

Interpret Data

Conferences

Write Manuscript

Submit

Peer Review

Publication

The journal publishes

the article which will

inform, enlighten, and

prompt new ideas…

The Researcher submits her/ his

manuscript to a journal

 The editor reviews for:

 Content

 Creativity

 Clarity

 Contribution to the knowledge of the field

 If the editor likes it…

It gets sent to other experts to

review

The Peer Reviewers

 Look to see what is

new about the

research

 Determine if the

methodology is sound

 Decide if the

conclusions are

supported

 Verify that this is a

contribution to the

field

The Peer Reviewers

 Don’t know who wrote the manuscript

 Are not known to the author of the manuscript

 Hence, this is often called a “blind” review

 It is also called a refereed process

The Referees/Reviewers:

 May recommend it be published as is

 Often suggest rewriting and revising

 May not like it at all—

-Journals typically reject more articles than they accept

-Prestigious journals may have a 90% rejection rate or higher

The Editor:

 Ultimately decides what will and will not be published.

 Works with the author to see the work through to completion

 May be a full-time professional or professor taking on the responsibility

Criticisms of the Peer-Review

Process:

 Time consuming

 Limited number of experts

 May suppress dissident points of view

The Peer Review Process

 Spots errors or weaknesses prior to

publication

 Ensures articles are substantial and

unique

 Is considered crucial in establishing the

validity of research