PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION CRITICAL ANALYSIS

PPA 500 Critical Analysis

Critical Analysis on the below article

http://rdcu.be/qt8Y

Title: Rethinking the ethics of corporate political activities in a post- citizens united era: Political equality, corporate citizenship, and market failures

Néron, P. (2016). Rethinking the ethics of corporate political activities in a post- citizens united

era: Political equality, corporate citizenship, and market failures. Journal of Business

Ethics, 136(4), 715-728.

The paper should be about 8 -- 10 double-spaced typed pages in length. The American Psychological Association in-text citation method is required.

Need complete in APA format within 40 hours

This assignment must be completed on time

Do not write in First person. All professional third person only

LABLE ALL SECTIONS BEFORE EACH CATEGORY

Purpose:

The purpose of the article critical analysis is to offer the student an opportunity to apply

concepts learned in the Foundations class to a specific analytic situation. In order to understand

and appreciate quality analysis and writing, a student must be able to critically evaluate the

organization, logic, reasoning, evidence and presentation of professional writing.

Structure

1. Executive summary: A one-page summary of the organization and substantive conclusions of the article as well as the key analytical arguments presented. USUALLY

A ONE PAGE SUMMARY OF YOUR PAPER/ANALYSIS. WRITE IT LAST B/C

YOU DON’T KNOW WHAT YOUR PAPER IS FULLY ABOUT UNTIL IT IS

DONE])

2. Thesis statement and organization of the analysis of the critical analysis (not the article). 3. Concise summary of the article, including appropriate citations (APA format required) 4. Overview of major points of your critical analysis. This section should define your

approach to critically evaluating the article -- what is your perspective, why, and how do

you justify it. PARAGRAPH OF MAJOR POINTS OF THE ANALYSIS.

5. Specific analysis of each point of the critical analysis. For this section, you will present your arguments on each point of critical evaluation. Be sure to appropriately defend your

positions using logic, reasoning and specific, cited, evidence from the article. MUST BE

STATED/ RELATED/ DEVELOPED with logical reason and EVIDENCE (each point of

analysis) Look/analyze at the structure of the article. Look/ analyze the content of article.

6. Conclusions. Summarize the presentation of the critical evaluation and tie together the points of argument. Draw justified conclusions about the quality and value of the article.

7. Bibliography. APA format required.

Grading Rubric Critical Analysis

Element Points Evaluation Criteria

Executive Summary 10 Clear, complete, one-page summary of the student’s

critical analysis paper

Organization 10 Clear organization, follows the assignment, includes

all required assignment elements

Article summary 15 Concise summary of the article at the basis for the

critical analysis, includes appropriate citations

Analysis structure 15 Well-structured includes concise overview,

perspective on the article analysis, division of

analysis into specific points

Analysis content 35 Logical, well-reasoned and supported arguments,

assesses both quality and value of the article, contains

analysis, not opinions, includes appropriate citations

Conclusions 5 Draws reasonable conclusions from the arguments

presented, ties the analysis together

Completeness and Quality of

Writing

10 All issues are addressed completely and thoroughly.

The analysis is well organized; grammatically

correct; minimal typos or misspellings, appropriate

citations are included and follow APA format

Total 100

Score/Grade Key

100

Superior

(A+)

95

Excellent

(A)

90

Very

Good

(A-)

89

Good

(B+)

85

Adequate

(B)

80

Borderline

(B-)

75

Deficient

(C)

69

Very

Poor

(D)

65

Fail

(F)