Contemporary Issues in HR Service

Distinction (70-100)*

Merit (60-69)

Pass (50-59)

Pass (40-49)

Fail (0-39)

Nature of topic(s) (10%)

Deconstruct and clarify the brief. To outline how you aim to address the brief.

|_| Identifies, outlines and describes the nature of topic(s) correctly, thoroughly and critically

|_| Identifies, outlines and describes the nature of topic(s) correctly and critically

|_| Identifies and outlines the nature of topic(s) correctly with adequate description

|_| Provides some Identification and outline the nature of topic(s) which is mainly description

|_| Fails to identify the nature of topic(s) correctly

Knowledge (40%)

Subject specific (20%)

Make use of and presentation of information (20%)

|_| Exceptional knowledge of ideas, concepts, theories and principles that underpin the brief

|_| Reading on relevant academic material beyond those given in teaching sessions or exercises, evidenced by an extensive selection and use of relevant academic references and quotations to support the discussion

|_| Very good knowledge of ideas, concepts, theories and principles that underpin the brief

|_| Reading on relevant academic material beyond those given in teaching sessions or exercises, evidenced by a very good selection and use of relevant academic references and quotations to support the discussion

|_| Clear but limiting detailed knowledge of ideas, concepts, theories and principles that underpin the brief

|_| Reading on relevant academic material beyond those given in teaching sessions or exercises, evidenced by a good selection and use of relevant academic references and quotations to support the discussion

|_| Adequate knowledge of ideas, concepts, theories and principles that underpin the brief

|_| Reading on relevant academic material beyond those given in teaching sessions or exercises, evidenced by an acceptable selection and use of relevant academic references and quotations to support the discussion

|_| Limited or largely irrelevant knowledge of ideas, concepts, theories and principles that underpin the brief.

|_| Limited or no

use of relevant academic references with content based largely on taught sessions and exercises

Analysis and discussion (30%)

You are expected to demonstrate your critical thinking which underpin your assignment brief (this will require you to construct a critical argument and evaluate viewpoints, evidence, ideas, concepts and principles where they apply to the brief)

|_| Organise and structure viewpoints, evidence, ideas, concepts, principles into a very strong and coherent argument which is well-grounded in academic/relevant literature

|_| Exceptional questioning and challenging of viewpoints, evidence, ideas, concepts and principles presented with supporting academic/relevant literature

|_| Organise and structure viewpoints, evidence, ideas, concepts, principles into a strong and coherent argument which is well-grounded in academic/relevant literature

|_| Very good questioning and challenging of viewpoints, evidence, ideas, concepts and principles presented with supporting academic/relevant literature

|_| Organise and structure viewpoints, evidence, ideas, concepts, principles into a good and largely coherent argument which has acceptable grounded in academic/relevant literature

|_| Good questioning and challenging of viewpoints, evidence, ideas, concepts and principles presented with supporting academic/relevant literature

|_| Organisation and structure of viewpoints, evidence, ideas, concepts, principles are weak having little coherence and minimal grounded in academic/relevant literature

|_| Acceptable questioning and challenging of viewpoints, evidence, ideas, concepts and principles presented with supporting academic/relevant literature

|_| Organisation and structure of viewpoints, evidence, ideas, concepts, principles are poor grounded in no, limited or irrelevant literature

|_| Limited or no questioning and challenging of viewpoints, evidence, ideas, concepts and principles presented

Conclusion and recommendation

(10%)

This section requires you to arrive at a conclusion and make recommendations (i.e. practical suggestions / ideas for future research) drawn from what you have already presented throughout the assignment

|_| Summarises the assignment critically reflecting on ideas, concepts and evidence presented

|_| Provides exceptional, recommendations based on the ideas, concepts and evidence presented

|_| Summarises the assignment clearly ideas, concepts and evidence presented

|_| Provides very good, recommendations based on the ideas, concepts and evidence presented

|_| Summarises the assignment in a largely descriptive manner with some connection to ideas, concepts and evidence presented

|_| Provides good, recommendations based on the ideas, concepts and evidence presented

|_| Summarises the assignment in a purely descriptive manner with limited connection to ideas, concepts and evidence presented

|_| Provides adequate, recommendations which have limited relation to the ideas, concepts and evidence presented

|_| Provides limited or no summary of the assignment

|_| Presents irrelevant or no recommendations

References and presentation of submission (10%)

|_| Work is presented to a very high standard

|_| Displays excellent use of reference style throughout with minimal instances of passages lacking supporting references

|_| Work is presented to a high standard with minimal problems in presentation

|_| Shows correct reference style throughout but some instances of passages lacking supporting references

|_| Work is acceptable with attention to presentation needed in some areas

|_| Displays correct reference style but several passages lacking supporting references

|_| The work is acceptable in presentation but attention is needed in many areas

|_| Generally having in consist, incorrect and infrequent reference style

|_| The work is poorly presented

|_| Presents no referencing