13 pages 48 hours (B117-1)
Pairs-Project-Proposal-Form-YutingBaoyun.docx
Psych 2800E - Pairs Project Proposal
SECTION 1: PROJECT REGISTRATION
|
1.1 |
Project Title: Music and Fragrance Effects on Stress Perception |
|
1.2 |
Anticipated Project Dates |
|
|
|
Start Date: |
February 16th, 2017 (Thursday) |
|
|
Completion Date: |
February 17th, 2017 (Friday) |
|
1.3 |
Principal or Lead Investigator, or sponsor of Student |
||
|
|
Name |
Jordan Phelps |
|
|
|
|
[email protected] |
|
Signature of Local Principle Investigator or Sponsor of Student attesting that:
a) all co-investigators have reviewed the protocol contents and are in agreement with the protocol as submitted;
b) all investigators have read the Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct of Research Involving Humans (1998) and the UWO Guidelines on Non Medical Research Involving Human Subjects and agree to abide by the guidelines therein;
c) the investigator(s) will adhere to the Protocol and Consent Form as approved by the REB; and
d) the Principal Investigator will notify the REB of any changes or adverse events/experiences in a timely manner;
e) the study, if funded by an external sponsor, will not start until the contract agreement has been approved by the appropriate university, hospital or research institute official.
f) The research poses no more than minimal risk
Signature Date
Signature(s) of Students attesting that they:
a) have read the Tri-Council Policy Statement and the UWO Guidelines on Non-Medical Research Involving Human Subjects and agree to abide by the guidelines therein;
b) will adhere to the Protocol and Consent Form as approved by the REB; and
c) will notify their supervisor and the REB of any changes or adverse events/experiences in a timely manner;
Signature(s) Date
SECTION 2: PROJECT INFORMATION
|
2.1 |
Objectives and Hypotheses: This study is investigating effects of music and fragrance on perception of stress. Obviously, exposure to happy music or a pleasant fragrance will significantly decrease participants’ stress level. Furthermore, the result will be more obviously when people accept both stimulations.
To illustrate, from previously researches, fragrance has been considered has a strong impact on humans’ hormones production. Exposure in a pleasant fragrance, like the smell of chocolate, would help people increase production of hormones which related to people’s feeling of happiness. As a result, students’ stress level will decrease significantly by fragrance stimulus.
Furthermore, happy musics are considered to be the best choice to relieve people’s anxiety. After hearing the music, people’s mood should be more gentle than before, which means there would be a lower stress level.
|
|
2.2 |
Research Participants: Our study data will be collected from about 40 undergraduate students, who are from 2 labs of psychology 2800 (research methods) course in University of Western Ontario. All of them are English speaking. Non-English speaking participants will not be allowed to join this study. To recruiting participants and reward their participation, the participation marks will be recorded in their score reports. Letter of information, informed consent sheet and debriefing sheet will be provided to participants.
|
|
2.3 |
Methodology This study is investigating effects of music and fragrance on perception of stress. For this study, 40 participants will be asked to randomly assigning to one of four groups, and completing perceived stress questionnaire before and after providing both music and fragrance stimuluses, or with none or only one of these stimuluses. Groups are named as group 1, group 2, group 3, and group 4. Group 1 will be provided with no stimulus. Group 2 will be provided with smell stimulus (chocolate) only. Group 3 will be provided with music stimulus (Super Mario Bros. Music - Ground Theme) only. Group 4 will be provided with both smell and music stimuluses (chocolate and Super Mario Bros. Music - Ground Theme).
About the procedure, first of all, participants will received letter of information and debriefing sheet, and sign informed consent sheet. Then, participants will be randomly divided into one of the four groups during their own lab period. Before expanding this experiment, all individuals are asked to complete perceived stress questionnaire. After starting research, we first play music (Super Mario Bros. Music - Ground Theme) to group 3 and 4. At the same time, group 1 and 2 are asked to wear earplug during this music stimulating time. At next step, some chocolate bar are distributed to group 2 and 4, and these 2 group members are asked to smell the chocolate for 15 seconds. After finished all these steps, all participants will be required to complete the questionnaire again, helping us know the relationship between music and fragrance stimuluses and stress. The study should take approximately 20 minutes for each lab section.
There are no known risks to participating in this study. Participation in this study is strictly voluntary and therefore they may discontinue participation at any time or refuse to answer any questions that make they feel uncomfortable.
This research does not involve deception. The confidentiality of participants’ identity is positively ensured. The questionnaires are coded by numbers and collected datas are only keeped by researchers. There is no use of individual’s private information in the release of the findings.
|
Lab6_1__Method_Appendices_NumberUse-2.pptx
Method, appendices, and APA number use
Lab 6
Outline
DUE: Introduction hard copy (Group Project)
How to write a Method section
Participants
Materials
Procedure
Appendices
APA number use
Coming up...
Group Project assignment #2
In-class work on Group Project
How to write a Method section
Purpose of the Method section
Describes:
Who was tested
What was used to test them
How they completed the study (step-by-step)
Allows readers to critically evaluate the appropriateness of your methodology
NB. Provide enough detail so that someone else could replicate the study based solely on your description
Appearance
Begins on a new line immediately following the last sentence of the Introduction section
Do not start a new page
The word “Method” appears centered and bolded
The Method section has three subsections
Participants
Materials
Procedure
Appearance
Each subsection begins on a new line, left-justified and bolded
“Participants” begins on the line immediately following the “Method” heading
“Materials” begins on the line immediately following the last sentence of “Participants”
“Procedure” begins on the line immediately following the last sentence of “Materials”
The body of each subsection text begins on the next line in standard typeface, indented 0.5-inch (one tab)
Appearance
WRITING A PAPER 8
This is the last sentence of the Introduction section.
Method
Participants
The sample was composed of 103 undergraduate students recruited from the University of Waterloo, who participated in partial fulfillment of a marketing course. Participants were 56 females and 47 males, ranging in age from 17 to 26 years (M = 20.09, SD = 1.78)...
Participants subsection
Adequately details the population tested in your study
This helps in generalizing the findings and making comparisons across replications
Participants subsection
Identify participant characteristics
Number of individuals and gender breakdown
Age range and mean/standard deviation
Relevant demographic characteristics (e.g., students, ethnicity breakdown)
Participants subsection
Note any inclusion/exclusion criteria and if Ps had any previous experience with the study
If Ps took part in partial fulfillment of a course, do not mention the course number (e.g., 2800E)
This is meaningless to a naïve reader
Instead describe the type of course (e.g., a psychology research methodology course)
Participants subsection
Describe how Ps were recruited/selected and how they were assigned to different conditions (if applicable)
Note whether Ps completed the study individually or in a group setting
If in groups, note the number of Ps per group
State if and how Ps were compensated for their participation (e.g., course credit, money)
Participants subsection
Note if any Ps failed to complete the study or were excluded from final analyses
If Ps were excluded, explain why
NB. All Participants data must be collected
Do not guess
Participants subsection
Remember, never use the term “subjects” for human participants
Instead, use “participants” or “individuals”
NB. Although the lecture abbreviates “participants” to “Ps” to save space, do not abbreviate the word “participants” in papers
Always spell out “participants” fully
Sample Participants
WRITING A PAPER 8
This is the last sentence of the Introduction section.
Method
Participants
Participants were 186 students (121 female, 65 male) enrolled in an introductory psychology course at Michigan State University. Participants ranged in age from 18 to 30 years (M = 21.95, SD = 2.70) and were eligible for the study as long as they had an active Facebook account. Participants were tested in groups of five and received course credit for their participation. Fourteen individuals failed to complete the study and were excluded from final analyses, nine because they did not meet eligibility requirements (i.e., they did not have an active Facebook account), and five because they failed to complete all questionnaires.
Materials subsection
Lists and describes any equipment, measures, or materials used in your study, and their purposes
This is useful information for understanding the details of your study, or in case another researcher is interested in using the same measures
Materials subsection
State how the IVs and DVs were measured
e.g., which items or questionnaires correspond to which variables
NB. When describing questionnaires, do not use the term “questions”
Instead, use “items”
Materials subsection
Describe instruments/measures used
If preexisting, provide the name of the measure (if available) and the appropriate author citation
Be sure to include the citation in your References section!
If newly developed for the study, note that the measure was designed for the current study
You must explain the rationale behind item creation if you create a measure yourself
Materials subsection
Describe instruments/measures used (cont’d)
Total number of items
Type(s) of items
e.g., yes/no, Likert scale
Item scale (if applicable)
e.g., “A 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (very untrue) to 5 (very true).”
NB. Scale anchors should be italicized in parentheses, yes/no items do not have scales
Sample item
Description of any apparatus (e.g., maze, photos, screen, flash cards)
Materials subsection
The purpose behind each material must be clear
e.g., if prior research has used the measure successfully, it is likely a valid measure of the variable in question
Provide reliability statistics (if available)
Aids in establishing validity and consistency for measure(s) used
Especially important for materials newly designed for the current study
Materials subsection
If you have multiple measures (e.g., three or more), subheadings can help with the readability of the Materials section (see Lab 3 lecture)
Each subheading under Materials is Level 3, and begins on a new line indented 0.5-inch (one tab) and bolded, followed by a period
The first letter of the first word is capitalized
The body of the text begins immediately after the period in standard typeface
The subheadings are very brief descriptions of the variable/measure of interest
Sample Materials #1
Materials
To manipulate psychological resource capacity, participants completed a Stroop color-naming task. A color word was presented on a computer screen and participants were asked to indicate the color of the text (not the word itself) as quickly as possible by pressing appropriate keys on the keyboard. Trials were 35% congruent (e.g., the word “blue” displayed in blue text) and 65% incongruent (e.g., the word “green” displayed in blue text). Participants in the control condition completed 30 trials, while participants in the depletion (experimental) condition completed 300 trials. Prior research (e.g., Govorun & Payne, 2006) has demonstrated that completing more Stroop trials is mentally exhausting and effectively diminishes psychological resources.
Finally, to assess mood participants completed the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS; Watson, Clark, & Tellegan, 1988; see Appendix A). The PANAS is comprised of 20 items, 10 of which measure positive affect (e.g., “I feel excited”) and 10 of which measure negative affect (e.g., “I feel distressed”). Individuals rated their current feelings on a scale of 1 (very slightly or not at all) to 5 (extremely), α = .91 for positive affect, α = .88 for negative affect.
Sample Materials #2
Materials
Resource depletion. To manipulate psychological resource capacity, participants completed a Stroop color-naming task. A color word was presented on a computer screen and participants were asked to indicate the color of the text (not the word itself) as quickly as possible by pressing appropriate keys on the keyboard. Trials were 35% congruent (e.g., the word “blue” displayed in blue text) and 65% incongruent (e.g., the word “green” displayed in blue text). Participants in the control condition completed 30 trials, while participants in the depletion (experimental) condition completed 300 trials. Prior research (e.g., Govorun & Payne, 2006) has demonstrated that completing more Stroop trials is mentally exhausting and effectively diminishes psychological resources.
Mood. Finally, to assess mood participants completed the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS; Watson, Clark, & Tellegan, 1988; see Appendix A). The PANAS is comprised of 20 items, 10 of which measure positive affect (e.g., “I feel excited”) and 10 of which measure negative affect (e.g., “I feel distressed”). Individuals rated their current feelings on a scale of 1 (very slightly or not at all) to 5 (extremely), α = .91 for positive affect, α = .88 for negative affect.
Procedure subsection
Provides a step-by-step account of what Ps did
This allows the reader to evaluate the appropriateness of the procedure, and is useful for other researchers who wish to replicate your study
Procedure subsection
NB. Procedure must be organized chronologically
Mention any special recruitment methods
e.g., if Ps were approached on the street
Include informed consent and debriefing as steps
Do not include minute details about the debriefing (e.g., hypotheses that were explained)
Procedure subsection
Note the number, duration, and make-up of sessions
Mention the setting of the study
e.g., lab, classroom
Do not include minute details about the setting or session (e.g., exact location/date/time, room décor, how Ps were randomly assigned to groups, how Ps logged onto computers)
Procedure subsection
Describe instructions given to Ps
This includes any cover stories (e.g., for studies with experimental manipulations in which you don’t want Ps to know the nature of the study outright)
Note any methods used to control extraneous variables (see next slide)
Extraneous variables
To be extraneous, the variable must affect the DV and call into question the validity and interpretability of your results
Extraneous variables must be controlled for to avoid confounds
Confounds result when two variables’ effects on a DV cannot be separated
Extraneous variables
Example
You want to lose weight, so you start exercising and dieting
If you lose weight, is it because of the exercise or the dieting?
We can’t tell! When combined with exercising, dieting is an extraneous variable and creates a confound
Extraneous variables
NB. Just because an unmeasured variable could impact the DV does not make your study invalid
To be extraneous, failure to account for that variable must potentially undermine your conclusions
Sample Procedure
Procedure
Prior to arrival, participants were randomly assigned among experimental conditions. Participants arrived at the lab and were greeted by an experimenter. They first received a letter of information and provided informed consent. Participants then completed the BMIS as a baseline measure of mood in order to control for mood effects.
Next, participants watched either a neutral, sad, or funny video clip depending on their condition. Specifically, participants in the neutral condition viewed a collection of natural imagery (e.g., landscapes) from the television series Planet Earth, individuals in the sad condition viewed an excerpt from the film Terms of Endearment in which a mother says goodbye to her young children as she prepares to die, and those in the funny condition watched a Robin Williams stand-up comedy routine. All video clips were five minutes long.
After the video clip participants were instructed that their next task was to drink as much as they could of a beverage, which was healthful but tasted bad. The beverage consisted of unsweetened orange Kool-Aid combined with water and vinegar. Newspaper and magazine articles that explained the health benefits of vinegar were provided. Individuals were asked to drink as many 1-ounce cups as they could. 10 seconds after each cup was consumed the experimenter asked, “Are you ready for another cup?” until the participant refused.
Lastly, participants completed a final questionnaire which asked about their perceptions of the different tasks and probed for hypothesis suspicion. Participants were then fully debriefed and dismissed. The entire study took approximately 30 minutes to complete.
Appendices
What goes in an appendix
Materials that are relatively brief and easily presented in print format
Questionnaires
Experimental scripts
Images
NB. In 2800E you will also need to include the Letter of Information, Consent Statement(s), and Debriefing Form as appendices on top of other experimental materials
Appearance
Begins on a new page immediately following the References section
The word “Appendix” appears centered in standard typeface
You must refer to appendices in the text of the Method section
Each appendix gets its own page
Appearance
If you have multiple appendices, label each with a capital letter (e.g., “Appendix A,” “Appendix B”) in the order in which they appear in the main text
Each appendix must have a title
The title appears on a new line immediately following the word “Appendix,” centered and in standard typeface
Provide the citation for the material (if applicable)
NB. Do not include the full reference
Appearance
The content of the appendix itself begins on a new line immediately following the appendix title, flush left and in standard typeface
Be sure to include relevant scoring information (e.g., which items are reverse-coded, which items comprise subscales)
Sample Appendix #1
WRITING A PAPER 18
Appendix C
Narcissistic Personality Inventory (Raskin & Hall, 1979)
Instructions. Below is a list of 40 statements, one in Column A and the opposite in Column B. For each statement, please choose the item from Column A or B that best matches you (even if it’s not a perfect fit) and place a checkmark in the adjacent column.
| A | B | |||
| 1 | I have a natural talent for influencing people. | I am not good at influencing people. | ||
| 2 | Modesty doesn’t become me. | I am essentially a modest person. | ||
| 3 | I would do almost anything on a dare. | I tend to be a fairly cautious person. | ||
| 4 | When people compliment me I sometimes get embarrassed. | I know that I am good because everybody keeps telling me so. | ||
| . . . |
Sample Appendix #2
WRITING A PAPER 19
Appendix D
Visual Stimuli
Pleasant.
Unpleasant.
APA number use
APA number use
General rule:
Use numerals (e.g., “14”) to express numbers of 10 or greater
Use words (e.g., “one”) to express numbers less than 10
The remainder of this section is devoted to exceptions and special usages
Numbers expressed in numerals
Numbers 10 and above
12 cm wide
The remaining 10%
25 years old
11th-grade students
The 15th trial
13 lists
105 stimulus words
Numbers expressed in numerals
Numbers in the Abstract of a paper
Numbers in a graphical display within a paper
Numbers that immediately precede a unit of measurement
A 5-mg dose
With 10.54 cm of...
Numbers expressed in numerals
Numbers that represent statistical or mathematical functions, fractional or decimal quantities, percentages, ratios, and percentiles/quartiles
Multiplied by 4
3 times as many
0.33 of the specimens
More than 8% of the sample
A ratio of 16:1
The 5th percentile
Numbers expressed in numerals
Numbers that represent time, dates, ages, scores/points on a scale, exact sums of money, and numerals as numerals
1 hr 33 min
At 12:30 a.m.
Scored 4 on a 7-point scale
The exception is approximations of number of days, months, and years
About four months ago
Numbers expressed in numerals
Numbers that denote a specific place in a numbered series, parts of books and tables, and each number in a list of four or more numbers
Grade 8
But “the eighth grade” (see ordinal numbers slide)
Table 3
As seen in row 4
Participants completed lists of 5, 10, 15, or 20 words
Numbers expressed in words
Any number that begins a sentence, title, or text heading
Forty-eight percent of the sample showed...
Twelve students improved, but 12 did not.
NB. Whenever possible, reword the sentence to avoid beginning with a number
Numbers expressed in words
Common fractions
One fifth of the class
A two-thirds majority
Morale was reduced by three-fourths following...
Universally accepted usages
The Fourth of July
The Ten Commandments
Combining numerals and words
Large rounded numbers (starting with millions)
Each year about 3 million people report...
A budget of $2.5 billion was provided...
Back-to-back modifiers
2 two-way interactions
Ten 7-point scales
Nineteen 4-year-olds
Combining numerals and words
Sometimes, combining numerals and words may detract from readability and clarity; in these instances, spell out both numbers
Correct:
The first two items
Incorrect:
The 1st two items
The first 2 items
Ordinal numbers
Treat ordinal numbers as you would cardinal numbers
| Ordinal | Cardinal Base |
| Second-order factor | Two orders |
| The fourth graders | Four grades |
| The first item of the 75th trial | One item, 75 trials |
| The first and third groups | One group, three groups |
| The 3rd-year students | 3 years |
| The 2nd and 11th rows | 2 rows, 11 rows |
Decimal fractions
Use a zero before the decimal point with numbers less than 1 when the statistic can exceed 1
0.23 cm
0.48 s
M = 1.55, SD = 0.42
Decimal fractions
Do not use a zero before a decimal fraction when the statistic cannot be greater than 1 (e.g., correlations, proportions, levels of statistical significance)
r(29) = -.36, p = .041
Decimal fractions
General rule for the number of decimal places to use in reporting results of experiments and analytic manipulations of data:
Round as much as possible while keeping prospective use and statistical precision in mind
Decimal fractions
Fewer decimal digits are easier to comprehend than more digits; therefore, in general it is best to round to two decimal places
If a measurement requires reporting more than two decimal places, it is most effective to rescale the measurement so it can be reported to two decimal places (e.g., converting meters to millimeters)
Correlations, proportions, and inferential statistics (e.g., t, F, 2) are reported to two decimal places
Decimal fractions
The tradition of reporting approximate, “less-than” p-values (e.g., p < .05, p < .01) is now outdated
With the development of more precise statistical testing software, we learn more about the data if we report exact p-values
When reporting statistical significance, report exact p-values to two or three decimal places
p = .036
Report p-values less than .001 as “p < .001”
Roman numerals
If Roman numerals are part of an established terminology, do not change to Arabic numerals
Type II error
Use Arabic, not Roman, numerals for routine seriation
Step 2
Commas in numbers
Use commas between groups of three digits in most figures of 1,000 or more
Exceptions:
| Page numbers | Page 1029 |
| Binary digits | 00110010 |
| Serial numbers | 290466960 |
| Degrees of temperature | 3071°F |
| Acoustic frequency designations | 2000 Hz |
| Degrees of freedom | F(24, 1050) |
Plurals of numbers
To form plurals of numbers (whether expressed as numerals or as words) add “s” or “es” alone, without an apostrophe
Fours and sixes
1950s
10s and 20s
Coming up...
Group Project assignment #2
Individually, write an APA Method section
You must include an Appendix section with your chosen measures
Detail only the topic your group has selected
Approximately two pages (not including Appendices)
DUE: 11:59PM Oct x
See WebCT for marking scheme
Group Project assignment #2
Be careful to put information under the correct Method subsections
e.g., how participants were recruited should be mentioned in the Participants subsection, not the Procedure
Group Project information
429 UWO undergraduates in a research methodology course
333 female
91 male
5 unspecified
Age range 17 to 57 years
Mean = 19.04 years
Standard deviation = 3.98 years
Group Project information
No inclusion/exclusion criteria, no previous experience with the study
Tested as one group
Received course credit for participation
NB. There are missing data points, so you may choose to exclude some Ps from analyses
If you do, make sure to note how many were excluded and why
Group Project information
Materials are the questionnaires for your two variables
Include these as APA-formatted appendices in your paper
All questionnaires are available on WebCT
Group Project information
Procedure
Informed consent
All Ps completed all questionnaires
Questionnaires administered in paper-and-pencil format
Completed in a classroom setting
Entire study took less than one hour to complete
Debriefing
Next lab
Lecture
Results, tables, and figures
In-class work on Group Project
Today
Now we will go to PUCL so you can work on your projects
Questions?
image3.png
image4.jpeg
Lab3_2__Introduction_References.pptx
Introduction and references
Lab 3
Outline
How to write an Introduction section
Writing clearly and concisely
References
In-class exercise
Coming up...
Group Project assignment #1
In-class work on Group Project
How to write an Introduction section
Purpose of the Introduction section
Presents the specific question under study and describes the research strategy
In the Introduction, you should:
Explore the importance of the research question
What you are investigating and why it matters
Provide a comprehensive review of related literature
State hypotheses and their correspondence to your research design
Appearance
Begins on a new page (page 3), immediately following the abstract
The title of your paper appears at the top of the page, centered in standard typeface
The title must be identical to that on the title page
There is no “Introduction” section label
Appearance
The body of the Introduction text begins on the line immediately after the title, in standard typeface
Paragraphs are left-aligned
Indent all paragraphs 0.5 inch (one tab)
Appearance
WRITING A PAPER 3
Writing a Paper using APA 6th Formatting
Begin the introduction here. Remember that there is no “Introduction” label to this section (this is because the introduction is clearly identified by its position in the manuscript). The title is centered and appears exactly as it does on the title page. There are no extra line spaces between the title and the start of the introduction.
Note the general APA format: the running head and page number appear in the header at the top of the page. The text of the entire paper is double-spaced in 12-point Times New Roman, left-aligned. New paragraphs are indented 0.5 inch (one tab). This is all review from the APA formatting lecture from Lab 1, so you should be set to go!
Opening paragraph
Start broad
Discuss the general area of investigation and its importance
This should be done in one or two sentences
Avoid rambling and irrelevant information
A broad start does not mean excessive repetition
A broad start still needs to be directly relevant to the area of study
Opening paragraph
Throughout the opening paragraph, become more specific
By the last sentence of the opening paragraph or the beginning of the second paragraph, you should be focusing on your particular topic/research question within the general area of investigation
e.g., defining or outlining the phenomenon under study
Opening paragraph
You will be graded on:
Starting appropriately broad
Getting to the point of your study without too much rambling
Rationale and theory
Rationale/theory
Explanation of why you think two variables will be correlated (Group Project), or why you think the IV will affect the DV in the way you predict (Pairs Project)
When a theory has a name (e.g., Signal Detection Theory), state the name, define it, mention who coined it, and explain its reasoning
Rationale and theory
Do not ignore competing or superseding theories
If they exist, you must mention the theory/theories
Remember, you are trying to help the reader understand when, how, and why a phenomenon or relationship occurs
Rationale and theory
You will be graded on:
Making a sufficient attempt to explain the rationale and theory behind your study
Describing the rationale in a way that is clear, correct, and logically sound
Including competing or superseding theories/explanations (if applicable)
Review of previous literature
Studies included in your literature review:
Review the history of research in your area
Help justify your predictions
Help defend your research design (e.g., materials, procedure)
Review of previous literature
For each article, provide a brief description of the purpose, method, and results
This should be done in one or two sentences
e.g., “Johnson (2001) administered a chocolate consumption survey to undergraduate students in order to determine which gender ate more chocolate. Contrary to the author’s expectations, there were no gender differences.”
Review of previous literature
You will be graded on:
Including the purpose, method, and results of cited studies in a concise manner, without describing irrelevant details
Describing the studies in a way that is clear, correct, and understandable
The overall quality/comprehensiveness of the review
Relevance of each paragraph is clear
How prior research led to your study
The purpose of any research is to either:
Replicate past findings using similar or refined methods
Cite which studies you are replicating
Add to knowledge by improving on and extending prior research
Cite which studies you are extending, and mention how you will improve on them
Investigate a topic that has not yet received attention (unlikely in 2800E)
How prior research led to your study
Identify similarities or differences in the methods used by past studies(compared to the present research) to help frame the purpose and predictions of your study
Explain why the similarities or differences are important
Be specific about connections
It is insufficient to say “Similarly to past research, the current study investigates the same area.”
How prior research led to your study
You will be graded on:
Identifying at least one way in which prior research contributed to the purpose, hypotheses, and/or design of your study
Clarifying whether similarities or differences in methods should lead to (a) replication of results, or (b) improvements that will extend past findings and add new contributions
Quality of arguments for why the identified similarities and differences are important
Definitions of key terms
Define any meaningful term immediately after it is mentioned
Avoid listing numerous definitions in sequence
Operationally define variables of interest (e.g., IV and DV)
Operationalizing variables means to define them in terms of how they were measured
e.g., “For purposes of this study, the dependent variable was defined as the number of correctly recalled words following a 10-minute delay.”
Definitions of key terms
Operational definitions of variables appear near the end of the Introduction section
Typically within the last two paragraphs
NB. A correlational study has no IV or DV, but variables must still be defined operationally
Definitions of key terms
You will be graded on:
Defining all relevant terms and abbreviations (see later slides for abbreviations information) immediately before or after they appear in the text
Operationally defining variables of interest
Clarity and correctness of definitions
Not listing numerous definitions all at once
Clear rationale behind hypotheses
Justify why your hypotheses make sense by incorporating theoretical and empirical rationale
Theoretical rationale
(Re)state why the variables should be correlated or why the IVs should affect the DV
Empirical rationale
(Re)state how similarities/differences to past research helped frame predictions
Clear rationale behind hypotheses
Be explicit about connections
It is insufficient to say “Based on review of prior research, we can expect that...” or “Based on theory, we predicted that...”
Hypotheses rationale appears near the end of the Introduction section (e.g., after the literature review, prior to operational definitions of variables)
Should be done in a few sentences
Clear rationale behind hypotheses
You will be graded on:
Clarity of theoretical rationale
Clarity of empirical rationale
Correctly stated hypotheses
Conclude the Introduction section by clearly stating all hypotheses
State in terms of operational definitions (see prior slide)
e.g., “Individuals exposed to a word list five times were expected to recall more words than individuals exposed to a word list only once.”
Correctly stated hypotheses
You will be graded on:
Stating hypotheses in terms of operational definitions
Clarity of hypothesis statements
Predictions must be unambiguous
Correctness of hypothesis statements
Including all hypotheses
Introduction organization and flow
Connections between paragraphs should be clear
Use of transition sentences is recommended; however, the best transition sentence is not a substitute for actual organization
Save explicit details about the current study until late in the Introduction (e.g., when using prior research to justify hypotheses)
Introduction organization and flow
Remember that the purpose of the Introduction section is to frame the present research
Goes beyond meeting the technical requirements of a paper
Do not simply list past studies that relate to your research question
Use prior literature to build the case for/lead up to your study
Introduction organization and flow
You will be graded on:
Whether ideas flow linearly from one paragraph to the next (e.g., not simply listing studies)
Degree to which the Introduction section helps frame the current study, as opposed to simply discussing a list of prior literature
Putting the Introduction together
There is no “correct” way to order the information you need to provide
However, there are common ways which work well and are widely used by authors
Suggested order #1
Establish the importance of your topic in the opening paragraph
Introduce the specific phenomenon under investigation and define key terms (e.g., the misinformation effect)
Describe the seminal (first) article exploring the phenomenon
Continue to review studies, explaining how each helped develop/refine understanding of the phenomenon
Detail the review/meta-analysis/theoretical article last, providing the most recent or comprehensive explanation for the effect, describing how it expands on the earlier explanations
Describe how your study is replicating or extending prior research
Briefly review the theoretical and empirical rationale for why the variables should be correlated or why the IVs should affect the DV
In the final paragraph state the operational definitions of the relevant variables, followed by specific hypotheses framed in terms of those definitions
Suggested order #2
Establish the importance of your topic in the opening paragraph
Introduce the specific phenomenon under investigation and define key terms (e.g., the misinformation effect)
Use the review/meta-analysis/theoretical article to describe the main findings in the field and/or further establish the prevalence of the phenomenon
Provide the established explanation for why the variables should be correlated or why the IVs should affect the DV
Describe several studies characteristic of the topic
Introduce your study as a replication or extension of prior research
In the final paragraph review the theoretical and empirical rationale behind predictions and state hypotheses in terms of the operational definitions of the relevant variables
Writing clearly and concisely
Organizing a paper with headings
In scientific writing, sound organizational structure is the key to clear, precise, and logical communication
Using headings can aid in effectively organizing ideas within a paper and can help the reader track the development of your arguments
Some headings are required for proper APA formatting (e.g., section headers such as “Method”)
The slides will specify when a heading is required
Organizing a paper with headings
The heading style recommended by APA 6th consists of five possible formatting arrangements, according to the number of levels of subordination
Within a section of the paper, begin with Level 1 and continue as needed
You will likely use Level 1-3 headings depending on the section
Most section headers (e.g., “Discussion”) are Level 1 headings
Exception: Introduction (the title of your paper does not count as a Level 1 heading)
Organizing a paper with headings
| Level of heading | Format |
| 1 | Centered, Boldface, Uppercase and Lowercase Heading |
| 2 | Flush Left, Boldface, Uppercase and Lowercase Heading |
| 3 | Indented, boldface, lowercase paragraph heading ending with a period. |
| 4 | Indented, boldface, italicized, lowercase paragraph heading ending with a period. |
| 5 | Indented, italicized, lowercase paragraph heading ending with a period. |
| NB. Lowercase paragraph heading means the first letter of the first word is uppercase and the remaining words are lowercase |
Organizing a paper with headings
WRITING A PAPER 3
Writing a Paper using APA 6th Formatting
Begin the introduction here. Imagine this is your first two or so paragraphs.
Heading Goes Here
Because this section does not have an “Introduction” section label, if you wish to use subheadings here you begin with Level 1. The subheading should help clarify the flow of your argument; for example, if you are drawing together two literatures that led to the present research.
Subheading If Needed
Within the first Level 1 heading, if you need to further break down the section use a Level 2 heading like this.
Another Heading
If you wish to identify a second major section of the introduction, use another Level 1 heading. Typically most introductions will make use of Level 1 headings for a subsection called “The Present Research” or equivalent. However, whether or not you use headings is up to you!
Organizing a paper with headings
WRITING A PAPER 8
Method
Participants
In a section like this, the “Method” label counts as the Level 1 heading. Subsequent headings are Level 2, and within those you may have Level 3 headings if you like. The Method section is likely one of the only sections in which you will reach Level 3 headings (rarely, you will do so in the Results section)
Materials
Materials subheading. Detail specific materials and measures here. Only use Level 3 headings if you plan on differentiating the different materials (e.g., one Level 3 heading would be material #1, the next would be material #2, etc.).
Procedure
Detail the procedure of the study here.
Organizing a paper with headings
NB. Do not label headings with numbers or letters
Do not overuse headings
They are solely for clarification when needed
You do not need a subheading for each specific idea you wish to discuss
Expressing ideas
Writing style
Present ideas in an orderly fashion
Aim for clear and logical communication
NB. A naïve reader will not know as much as you do about the topic; make sure explanations and the order of ideas are understandable by someone with little or no experience in the field
Economy of expression
Less is more, do not embellish!
Expressing ideas
Verb tense
Past tense (e.g., “Smith demonstrated”) or present perfect tense (e.g., “researchers have shown”) is appropriate for the literature review and the description of the procedure if the discussion is of past events
Past tense (e.g., “anxiety decreased significantly”) to describe results
Present tense (e.g., “the results of Study 2 indicate”) to discuss implications of the results and to present conclusions
Expressing ideas
Avoid wordiness
“based on the fact” → “because”
“at the present time” → “now”/ “currently”
“for the purpose of” → “for”/ “to”
“in order to” → “to”
“there were several students who completed” → “several students completed”
Expressing ideas
Avoid redundancy
Use only the number of words necessary to convey your meaning
Do not repeat yourself in an effort to add emphasis to your ideas
| they were both alike | one and the same | a total of 68 participants |
| in close proximity | four different groups saw | completely unanimous |
| instructions, which were exactly the same as those used | just exactly | absolutely essential |
| very close to significance | period of time | has been previously found |
| summarize briefly | small in size | the reason is because |
Expressing ideas
Avoid colloquialisms and figures of speech
“write up” → “report”
“put through” → “exposed to”
“a lot” → use more precise and informative wording
“can’t”/ “didn’t” → “cannot”/ “did not”
“we made participants” → “participants were asked to”
“go through” → “complete”
Avoid conversational tone
Expressing ideas
Avoid anthropomorphisms (i.e., do not attribute human characteristics to non-human animals or inanimate objects)
An experiment cannot “attempt to demonstrate,” “control unwanted variables,” or “interpret findings”
A table or figure cannot “compare”
NB. These things can “indicate” or “show”
Abbreviations
A term that shortens to an acronym must be written out fully and then immediately followed by the acronym in parentheses
Do not use periods in between the letters of an acronym
Be consistent with acronyms
Do not alternate between the full form and the acronym
Abbreviations
Example 1
“Prior research has used the Implicit Association Test (IAT; Greenwald et al., 1998) to examine...”
Example 2
“A study using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD), multiple system atrophy (MSA) and progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) revealed that patients with PD performed better on tests of verbal fluency than patients with MSA or PSP.”
Abbreviations
APA Style permits the use of abbreviations that appear as word entries (i.e., that are not labeled abbr) in Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary (2005)
These abbreviations do not require explanation in the text
IQ, REM, ESP, HIV, AIDS, NADP, ACTH
Abbreviations
Do not use the abbreviation S, P, E, or O to denote subject, participant, experimenter, and observer, respectively
Latin abbreviations
Use only inside parentheses
Outside of parentheses use the English translation
cf. (“compare”)
e.g., (“for example,”)
, etc. (“, and so forth”)
i.e., (“that is,”)
viz., (“namely,”)
vs. (“versus” or “against”)
Latin abbreviations
Exceptions:
Use for both parenthetical and non-parenthetical references and text citations
v. (“versus”)
et al. (“and others”)
Scientific abbreviations
Use abbreviations and symbols for metric and non-metric units of measurement that accompany numeric values
4 cm
30 s
12 min
18 hr
45°C
Scientific abbreviations
Do not repeat abbreviated units of measure when expressing multiple amounts
Correct:
16-30 kHz
0.3, 1.5, and 3.0 mg/dL
Incorrect:
16 kHz-30 kHz
0.3 mg/dL, 1.5 mg/dL, and 3.0 mg/dL
Scientific abbreviations
Abbreviate the following units of time
hr (hour)
min (minute)
ms (millisecond)
ns (nanosecond)
s (second)
Scientific abbreviations
Do not abbreviate the following units of time, even when accompanied by numeric values
Day
Week
Month
Year
Scientific abbreviations
To form the plural of most abbreviations and statistical symbols, add “s” alone (not italicized and without an apostrophe)
IQs
Eds.
vols.
Ms
ps
ns
Scientific abbreviations
Do not add “s” to pluralize abbreviations of units of measurement
Correct:
12 cm
Incorrect:
12 cms
To form the plural of the abbreviation p. (page), write pp.
Do not add “s”
References
Appearance
Begins on a new page immediately following the conclusion of your paper
The word “References” appears at the top of the page, centered and in standard typeface
Appearance
The first reference appears on the line immediately following the References heading, flush left
References are double-spaced
There are no extra line breaks between references
Use hanging indent format (found in Paragraph, Indents and Spacing, Indentation)
First line of each reference is flush left, and subsequent lines of the same reference are indented 0.5-inch
Appearance
List references alphabetically, by author surname
Remember: do not reorganize/alphabetize surnames within a reference, since order is determined by author contribution (see Lab 1 lecture)
Sample References
WRITING A PAPER 14
References
Gailliot, M. T., Baumeister, R. F., DeWall, C. N., Maner, J. K., Plant, E. A., Tice, D. M., . . . Schmeichel,
B. J. (2007). Self-control relies on glucose as a limited energy source: Willpower is more than a
metaphor. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(2), 325-336.
Quine, W. V. O., & Ullian, J. S. (1970). The web of belief. New York: Random House.
Slotter, E. B., & Finkel, E. J. (2011). I3 Theory: Instigating, impelling, and inhibiting factors in
aggression. In P. R. Shaver & M. Mikulincer (Eds.), Human aggression and violence: Causes,
manifestations, and consequences (pp. 35-52). Washington: American Psychological Association.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185,
1124-1131.
Sample References
WRITING A PAPER 14
References
Gailliot, M. T., Baumeister, R. F., DeWall, C. N., Maner, J. K., Plant, E. A., Tice, D. M., . . . Schmeichel,
B. J. (2007). Self-control relies on glucose as a limited energy source: Willpower is more than a
metaphor. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(2), 325-336.
Quine, W. V. O., & Ullian, J. S. (1970). The web of belief. New York: Random House.
Slotter, E. B., & Finkel, E. J. (2011). I3 Theory: Instigating, impelling, and inhibiting factors in
aggression. In P. R. Shaver & M. Mikulincer (Eds.), Human aggression and violence: Causes,
manifestations, and consequences (pp. 35-52). Washington: American Psychological Association.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185,
1124-1131.
No extra line breaks
Hanging indent
All references double-spaced
Sample References
WRITING A PAPER 14
References
Gailliot, M. T., Baumeister, R. F., DeWall, C. N., Maner, J. K., Plant, E. A., Tice, D. M., . . . Schmeichel,
B. J. (2007). Self-control relies on glucose as a limited energy source: Willpower is more than a
metaphor. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(2), 325-336.
Quine, W. V. O., & Ullian, J. S. (1970). The web of belief. New York: Random House.
Slotter, E. B., & Finkel, E. J. (2011). I3 Theory: Instigating, impelling, and inhibiting factors in
aggression. In P. R. Shaver & M. Mikulincer (Eds.), Human aggression and violence: Causes,
manifestations, and consequences (pp. 35-52). Washington: American Psychological Association.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185,
1124-1131.
Alphabetical order of author surnames
Sample References
WRITING A PAPER 14
References
Gailliot, M. T., Baumeister, R. F., DeWall, C. N., Maner, J. K., Plant, E. A., Tice, D. M., . . . Schmeichel,
B. J. (2007). Self-control relies on glucose as a limited energy source: Willpower is more than a
metaphor. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(2), 325-336.
Quine, W. V. O., & Ullian, J. S. (1970). The web of belief. New York: Random House.
Slotter, E. B., & Finkel, E. J. (2011). I3 Theory: Instigating, impelling, and inhibiting factors in
aggression. In P. R. Shaver & M. Mikulincer (Eds.), Human aggression and violence: Causes,
manifestations, and consequences (pp. 35-52). Washington: American Psychological Association.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185,
1124-1131.
Do not reorder author surnames within a reference
Sample References
WRITING A PAPER 14
References
Gailliot, M. T., Baumeister, R. F., DeWall, C. N., Maner, J. K., Plant, E. A., Tice, D. M., . . . Schmeichel,
B. J. (2007). Self-control relies on glucose as a limited energy source: Willpower is more than a
metaphor. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(2), 325-336.
Quine, W. V. O., & Ullian, J. S. (1970). The web of belief. New York: Random House.
Slotter, E. B., & Finkel, E. J. (2011). I3 Theory: Instigating, impelling, and inhibiting factors in
aggression. In P. R. Shaver & M. Mikulincer (Eds.), Human aggression and violence: Causes,
manifestations, and consequences (pp. 35-52). Washington: American Psychological Association.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185,
1124-1131.
References with 1-6 Authors
Give author surname, followed by a comma, and then the initial(s) for the author’s given name.
Separate initials by a space. Each initial has a period after it. Separate author names by a comma.
When there are 2+ authors, place an ampersand (&) before the surname of the final author. There is a comma before the ampersand.
Sample References
WRITING A PAPER 14
References
Gailliot, M. T., Baumeister, R. F., DeWall, C. N., Maner, J. K., Plant, E. A., Tice, D. M., . . . Schmeichel,
B. J. (2007). Self-control relies on glucose as a limited energy source: Willpower is more than a
metaphor. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(2), 325-336.
Quine, W. V. O., & Ullian, J. S. (1970). The web of belief. New York: Random House.
Slotter, E. B., & Finkel, E. J. (2011). I3 Theory: Instigating, impelling, and inhibiting factors in
aggression. In P. R. Shaver & M. Mikulincer (Eds.), Human aggression and violence: Causes,
manifestations, and consequences (pp. 35-52). Washington: American Psychological Association.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185,
1124-1131.
Year of Publication
Appears in parentheses following the final author’s initials. There is a space between the initial and the first parenthesis.
Place a period after the second parenthesis.
Sample References
WRITING A PAPER 14
References
Gailliot, M. T., Baumeister, R. F., DeWall, C. N., Maner, J. K., Plant, E. A., Tice, D. M., . . . Schmeichel,
B. J. (2007). Self-control relies on glucose as a limited energy source: Willpower is more than a
metaphor. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(2), 325-336.
Quine, W. V. O., & Ullian, J. S. (1970). The web of belief. New York: Random House.
Slotter, E. B., & Finkel, E. J. (2011). I3 Theory: Instigating, impelling, and inhibiting factors in
aggression. In P. R. Shaver & M. Mikulincer (Eds.), Human aggression and violence: Causes,
manifestations, and consequences (pp. 35-52). Washington: American Psychological Association.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185,
1124-1131.
Article Title
Use lower case and standard typeface. However, capitalize the following:
The first letter of the title
Any words that are normally capitalized (e.g., proper names)
The first letter after a colon or other punctuation mark (colons, etc. separate the title from the subtitle)
Sample References
WRITING A PAPER 14
References
Gailliot, M. T., Baumeister, R. F., DeWall, C. N., Maner, J. K., Plant, E. A., Tice, D. M., . . . Schmeichel,
B. J. (2007). Self-control relies on glucose as a limited energy source: Willpower is more than a
metaphor. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(2), 325-336.
Quine, W. V. O., & Ullian, J. S. (1970). The web of belief. New York: Random House.
Slotter, E. B., & Finkel, E. J. (2011). I3 Theory: Instigating, impelling, and inhibiting factors in
aggression. In P. R. Shaver & M. Mikulincer (Eds.), Human aggression and violence: Causes,
manifestations, and consequences (pp. 35-52). Washington: American Psychological Association.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185,
1124-1131.
Journal Name
Italicize the journal name. Capitalize major words.
Give the name exactly as it appears in publication.
Do not italicize the comma after the journal name.
Sample References
WRITING A PAPER 14
References
Gailliot, M. T., Baumeister, R. F., DeWall, C. N., Maner, J. K., Plant, E. A., Tice, D. M., . . . Schmeichel,
B. J. (2007). Self-control relies on glucose as a limited energy source: Willpower is more than a
metaphor. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(2), 325-336.
Quine, W. V. O., & Ullian, J. S. (1970). The web of belief. New York: Random House.
Slotter, E. B., & Finkel, E. J. (2011). I3 Theory: Instigating, impelling, and inhibiting factors in
aggression. In P. R. Shaver & M. Mikulincer (Eds.), Human aggression and violence: Causes,
manifestations, and consequences (pp. 35-52). Washington: American Psychological Association.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185,
1124-1131.
Volume Number
Italicize. Appears after the journal name.
Sample References
WRITING A PAPER 14
References
Gailliot, M. T., Baumeister, R. F., DeWall, C. N., Maner, J. K., Plant, E. A., Tice, D. M., . . . Schmeichel,
B. J. (2007). Self-control relies on glucose as a limited energy source: Willpower is more than a
metaphor. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(2), 325-336.
Quine, W. V. O., & Ullian, J. S. (1970). The web of belief. New York: Random House.
Slotter, E. B., & Finkel, E. J. (2011). I3 Theory: Instigating, impelling, and inhibiting factors in
aggression. In P. R. Shaver & M. Mikulincer (Eds.), Human aggression and violence: Causes,
manifestations, and consequences (pp. 35-52). Washington: American Psychological Association.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185,
1124-1131.
Issue Number
Put in parentheses immediately after the volume number. Do not separate with a space. Do not italicize. Do not italicize the comma after the issue number.
NB. Only provide the issue number if each issue of the journal begins on page 1.
Sample References
WRITING A PAPER 14
References
Gailliot, M. T., Baumeister, R. F., DeWall, C. N., Maner, J. K., Plant, E. A., Tice, D. M., . . . Schmeichel,
B. J. (2007). Self-control relies on glucose as a limited energy source: Willpower is more than a
metaphor. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(2), 325-336.
Quine, W. V. O., & Ullian, J. S. (1970). The web of belief. New York: Random House.
Slotter, E. B., & Finkel, E. J. (2011). I3 Theory: Instigating, impelling, and inhibiting factors in
aggression. In P. R. Shaver & M. Mikulincer (Eds.), Human aggression and violence: Causes,
manifestations, and consequences (pp. 35-52). Washington: American Psychological Association.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185,
1124-1131.
Page Number
Appears after the volume/issue number. Do not italicize.
Do not put “p.” “pp.” or “pg.” in front of the page number.
Follow the page number
with a period.
Sample References
WRITING A PAPER 14
References
Gailliot, M. T., Baumeister, R. F., DeWall, C. N., Maner, J. K., Plant, E. A., Tice, D. M., . . . Schmeichel,
B. J. (2007). Self-control relies on glucose as a limited energy source: Willpower is more than a
metaphor. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(2), 325-336.
Quine, W. V. O., & Ullian, J. S. (1970). The web of belief. New York: Random House.
Slotter, E. B., & Finkel, E. J. (2011). I3 Theory: Instigating, impelling, and inhibiting factors in
aggression. In P. R. Shaver & M. Mikulincer (Eds.), Human aggression and violence: Causes,
manifestations, and consequences (pp. 35-52). Washington: American Psychological Association.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185,
1124-1131.
References with 7+ Authors
List the first six authors. After the sixth, place a spaced ellipsis (. . .) followed by the final author.
The rest of the reference follows the standard rules.
Sample References
WRITING A PAPER 14
References
Gailliot, M. T., Baumeister, R. F., DeWall, C. N., Maner, J. K., Plant, E. A., Tice, D. M., . . . Schmeichel,
B. J. (2007). Self-control relies on glucose as a limited energy source: Willpower is more than a
metaphor. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(2), 325-336.
Quine, W. V. O., & Ullian, J. S. (1970). The web of belief. New York: Random House.
Slotter, E. B., & Finkel, E. J. (2011). I3 Theory: Instigating, impelling, and inhibiting factors in
aggression. In P. R. Shaver & M. Mikulincer (Eds.), Human aggression and violence: Causes,
manifestations, and consequences (pp. 35-52). Washington: American Psychological Association.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185,
1124-1131.
Book Reference
Author names and year of publication are formatted the same way as a journal article.
The title of the book follows the same rules for a journal article title, but it is italicized.
Follow the book title with the location of printing and the publisher in standard typeface. The location and publisher are separated by a colon.
Sample References
WRITING A PAPER 14
References
Gailliot, M. T., Baumeister, R. F., DeWall, C. N., Maner, J. K., Plant, E. A., Tice, D. M., . . . Schmeichel,
B. J. (2007). Self-control relies on glucose as a limited energy source: Willpower is more than a
metaphor. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(2), 325-336.
Quine, W. V. O., & Ullian, J. S. (1970). The web of belief. New York: Random House.
Slotter, E. B., & Finkel, E. J. (2011). I3 Theory: Instigating, impelling, and inhibiting factors in
aggression. In P. R. Shaver & M. Mikulincer (Eds.), Human aggression and violence: Causes,
manifestations, and consequences (pp. 35-52). Washington: American Psychological Association.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185,
1124-1131.
Book Chapter Reference
Author names, year of publication, and chapter title are formatted the same way as a journal article.
Follow the chapter title with the book editor name(s). Use the exact phrase “In A. Author (Ed.)” and modify if there are additional editors (see the sample below).
After the editor information put a comma followed by the title of the book (formatted the same way as a book title).
At the end of the book title put the pages in parentheses. In this case you use “pp.” Finally, end with the location and publisher.
In-class exercise
Exercise
Each reference has one (and only one) type of formatting error
Keep this handout! It will be useful for future assignments
Next week...
Group Project assignment #1
Individually, write an APA Introduction section using the topic selected by your group
You must include a title page and References section
Approximately 5-7 pages (not including title page/References section)
Write as though YOU are the primary researcher
DUE: 11:59PM Oct XX
See WebCT for marking scheme
Group Project assignment #1
If you need help with formatting, check the APA 6th Publication Manual (available for 2-hour loan at Weldon) or use this lecture
Do not use journal articles as formatting guides
APA formatting has vastly changed in the last five years, so it is very likely that references, etc. in older articles will be out of date
Group Project assignment #1
Use the “How to Read a Research Article” assignment to help you hone in on the vital and relevant information when you read articles for your Introduction
Proofread your assignment before you submit it
Group Project assignment #1
Do not procrastinate
You will likely be overwhelmed and confused by all the information if you leave all your reading until the last minute
Read an article a day (or every other day) and write out important points
When you write out information, paraphrase so you don’t risk plagiarizing when you go back to look at your notes
Think about how the information relates to your study and your predictions
Next lab
In-class library information session
Conducting an effective literature search
In-class work on Group Project
Your group must have a finalized topic by the end of class next week
Today
In-class work on Group Project
You must be in a group and have a preliminary topic selected by the end of class today
Email me with the names, email addresses, and phone numbers of all group members
Remember to cc your group members on the email!
Include your tentative topic in the email
Questions?
Lab10_1__Abstract_Discussion-2.pptx
Abstract and Discussion
Lab 10
Outline
DUE: Results hard copy (Group Project)
How to write an Abstract section
How to write a Discussion section
Coming up...
Group Project assignment #4
In-class work on Group Project
How to write an Abstract section
Purpose of the Abstract section
Discuss key points of the study in a concise and comprehensive manner
“A well-prepared abstract can be the most important single paragraph in an article.” (Publication Manual of APA (6th ed.), p. 26)
Readers encounter the abstract first and then decide if they want to read the rest of the article
Appearance
Appears on a new page (p. 2) immediately following the title page
The word “Abstract” appears centered in standard typeface
The body of the text begins on the next line in standard typeface
Written as a single paragraph of no more than 120 words
NB. The paragraph is not indented
Appearance
Use numerals for all numbers (even if words are typically used)
Includes numbers less than 10
Includes numbers that begin a sentence
Abbreviations that need to be discussed in the body of the paper should be explained in the Abstract
Appearance
WRITING A PAPER 2
Abstract
In an extension of research demonstrating causal effects of intercessory prayer on physical healing in a medical setting, the present experiment investigated...
Structure and content of the Abstract section
State the topic under investigation
Briefly describe participants (e.g., #, students)
Briefly describe methodology (materials and procedure)
NB. This should be one or two sentences
Explicitly state findings without using statistics (e.g., no r- or p-values)
State the implications of your findings (how they are important)
Even if your results are not statistically significant they still have implications!
Structure and content of the Abstract section
The Abstract should effectively explain:
What you did
How you did it
What you found
Why your findings are important
Common Abstract mistakes
Forgetting to explicitly state findings
For each hypothesis, you must mention if a significant effect was found
Forgetting to suggest implications
e.g., “partial support for” or “contradicts” Theory X
Describing definitions or methodology in too much detail
How to write a Discussion section
Purpose of the Discussion section
Evaluate and interpret the results of your study
Compare your results to previous findings
NB. Use previous research to help explain your results
Review limitations of your study, suggest implications of your findings (can include real-world applications), and make suggestions for future research
Appearance
Begins on a new line immediately following the last sentence of the Results section
Do not start a new page
The word “Discussion” appears centered and bolded
The body of the text begins on the next line in standard typeface, indented 0.5-inch (one tab)
Appearance
WRITING A PAPER 12
This is the conclusion of your Results section.
Discussion
The extant literature on self-control has emphasized that a lower capacity for self-control predicts a host of negative outcomes; however, the present research demonstrated...
Introduction vs. Discussion sections
Focus of the Introduction is on previous research and how it led to the current study
Focus of the Discussion is on the current study’s results and how they fit with previous literature, etc.
Use previous studies (e.g., methodology, findings, theories) to help explain your results
NB. All research cited in the Discussion must be used to aid in understanding what you found and why you found it, rather than just review the field
Structure of the Discussion section
Remind the reader of hypotheses
Discuss pattern of results without referring to specific numbers
Use previous research to help understand results
Relate current findings to existing rationale/theory
Review limitations of the study
Suggest implications for the findings
Make suggestions for future research
Conclude the paper
Opening paragraphs
In the first two paragraphs of the Discussion, remind the reader of hypotheses and state whether each was supported statistically
Review the pattern of results without referring to specific numbers/statistics
Review the results for each hypothesis, even if they are not statistically significant or run counter to your predictions
Based on the results, draw general conclusions
Use of previous research to help interpret findings
Explain how similarities/differences to prior studies further understanding of your results
Remember: Do not simply review previous literature
Address only the aspects of prior studies that are relevant to making sense of your results
Use of previous research to help interpret findings
You will be graded on:
Whether the connections made are specific
“Both studies investigated the relationship between X and Y” is too general
How well you explain the relevance of each connection to prior research
It must be clear why the similarities/differences are important enough to be described in the Discussion
If a difference in findings arose, what might account for this difference?
Relation of findings to existing rationale/theory
Discuss if the current findings are consistent vs. inconsistent with existing rationale or theory
Explain if your findings have implications for existing rationale or theory
Offer explanations for your results
Relation of findings to existing rationale/theory
You will be graded on:
Whether you effectively used rationale/theory to explain why the variables were or were not correlated (remember there is no IV or DV in a correlational study)
Implications of your findings for existing rationale/theory
Do your findings support, partially support, or contradict existing rationale/theory? Can they extend it?
Can your results help decide between two competing theories?
State how your results contribute to existing rationale/theory
Relation of findings to existing rationale/theory
You will be graded on:
Quality and comprehensiveness
Did you get to the bottom of what happened, or did you just go with an obvious first thought?
Explanations must be logically valid and clear
Limitations
Discuss shortcomings in your participants, materials, or procedure that may cause you to be unsure of your conclusions
Identify potential extraneous variables
Limitations
You will be graded on:
Number of limitations (2-3)
Whether each limitation is truly a limitation vs. a random or irrelevant detail (see next slides)
Clarity of explanations
Limitations
Limitations often take one of three forms:
An oddity in your sample
A confounding variable
Design constraints
Oddity in your sample
You must first explain how your sample was different
Then discuss why the oddity in your sample should lead to a result different than normally expected
e.g., Honors students tend to have greater working memory capacity. Good working memory is known to reduce susceptibility to the misinformation effect (citation). Consequently, the honors student sample may account for why the misinformation effect was smaller than it has been in past research.
Confounding variable
Explain what variable you failed to measure
What effect failing to account for that variable may have had on your results
NB. Not including another interesting variable that may also influence a correlation, etc. does not automatically make that variable extraneous
You must be able to explain why the variable calls into question your conclusions (i.e., significance test results)
Design constraints
Explain how the design of the study limits the interpretability of your results or undermines your confidence in your conclusions
NB. No manipulation limits the ability to infer causation
Discuss why you chose your design knowing its limitations
Common Limitations mistakes
Choose only limitations you can defend as potentially impacting your conclusions
e.g., If you have more female than male Ps, this is only a limitation if gender differences arose
Do not suggest that 400 Ps is too small a sample size. It’s not!
Common Limitations mistakes
Do not list limitations without explaining/discussing why they are limitations
Be specific
Do not give limitations that are true for all studies
e.g., All research wants a larger or more representative sample; these are not insightful limitations of your particular study
Implications
You will be graded on:
Number of implications (2-3)
Whether you adequately applied your specific findings to real-world applications
NB. Apply your results, not the general phenomenon (this is often a matter of wording)
If you only partially supported a phenomenon, make sure to include the appropriate caveat statements in your suggested applications
Common Implications mistakes
Do not repeat the same application and count it as two implications
Implications must actually follow the results of your study
Do not overreach
Be careful to consider and discuss implications logically and modestly
Future Directions
Suggestions for future research should follow from points you raised in the Discussion section
e.g., If your results contradict previous findings because of methodological differences, perhaps this difference suggests the variable(s) of interest should be explored more fully
Future Directions
You will be graded on:
Number of suggested future directions (2-3)
One future direction should address a limitation
Insightful limitations (e.g., confounds) often provide ideas for future research
Do not suggest that your study be rerun with a minor fix
Do not simply reword limitations
Future Directions
You will be graded on:
Going beyond correcting the limitations of your study
The goal is to identify potentially fruitful areas of research that have not yet received sufficient attention
NB. Do not stray too far from your topic. Suggestions should follow from your study
Clarity of rationale for each suggestion
Do not state a suggestion without subsequent explanation
Explain why the suggestion is an important opportunity for investigation (e.g., how it would add to knowledge about the phenomenon in question)
Conclusion paragraph
Sum up the purpose, importance, and implications of your entire paper in a succinct manner
Subheadings in the Discussion
You may use Level 2 subheadings (see Lab 3 lecture) to delineate the limitations, implications, and future directions sections of the Discussion if you wish
Some researchers use a separate subheading/section for all three, others use one section subheading/section for “Limitations” and a combined one for “Implications and Future Directions”
Some researchers use a subheading for the concluding paragraph called “Conclusion” or “Concluding Remarks”
Tips for writing the Discussion
Discuss all hypotheses (even those that were not statistically significant)
Avoid using “we,” “I,” or “they”
Scientific writing aims to minimize the effect of the author
Tips for writing the Discussion
When connecting your study to previous research, do not just choose any connection
Reasons for your choice of connection should be logically sound and clearly stated
Connections should be important to understanding your study
Tips for writing the Discussion
When relating research to your study, do not simply state that it relates
Explain how it aids in the interpretation your results
Coming up...
Group Project assignment #4
Individually, write APA Abstract and Discussion sections
You must include a title page and References section
Remember the Abstract can be no more than 120 words
The Discussion section should be approximately 4-6 pages
DUE: 11:59PM Nov/Dec XX
See WebCT for marking scheme
Group Project assignment #4
You can (but are not obligated to) use the same articles you cited in your Introduction assignment
You must cite at least four articles in your Discussion
Next lab
In-class work on Group Project
Today
Now we will go to PUCL so you can work on your projects
Questions?
Final+Assignments (4).pptx
Final Paper Components
Title Page
Abstract (no more than 120 words)
Body of the paper (9 pages minimum)
Introduction (3-4 pages)
Method (2 pages) – participants, materials, procedure
Results (1 page) – Include an APA formatted graph displaying your findings
Discussion (3-4 pages)
References (6 minimum, but try to use 10+)
Appendices (Consent Sheet, Letter of Information, Debriefing Form, and any materials you use)
SPSS Output
Presentation Components
Very similar – you’re essentially giving a talk on your paper
Introduction – What is already known about your research topic, and why is your experiment worth conducting?
Method – Go through this step by step
Results – Tell us whether you had any main effects or an interaction, and explain what they mean (show us your graph to make it easier)
Discussion – What do your results tell us about the research topic, and how do they compare to related studies? Explain any limitations you feel your study had, any implications (real world or theoretical), and any future directions in the research area following your study
Anova-Result.pdf
GET FILE='\\ssc-venus.uwo.pri\sscstudent$\ychiu29\Desktop\For Anova.sav'. >Warning # 67. Command name: GET FILE >The document is already in use by another user or process. If you make >changes to the document they may overwrite changes made by others or your >changes may be overwritten by others. >File opened \\ssc-venus.uwo.pri\sscstudent$\ychiu29\Desktop\For Anova.sav DATASET NAME DataSet1 WINDOW=FRONT. GET FILE='\\ssc-venus.uwo.pri\sscstudent$\ychiu29\Desktop\For DV.sav'. >Warning # 67. Command name: GET FILE >The document is already in use by another user or process. If you make >changes to the document they may overwrite changes made by others or your >changes may be overwritten by others. >File opened \\ssc-venus.uwo.pri\sscstudent$\ychiu29\Desktop\For DV.sav DATASET NAME DataSet2 WINDOW=FRONT. COMPUTE DV=Total2 - Total1. EXECUTE. DATASET ACTIVATE DataSet1. DATASET ACTIVATE DataSet1. SAVE OUTFILE='\\ssc-venus.uwo.pri\sscstudent$\ychiu29\Desktop\For Anova.sav' /COMPRESSED. >Warning # 5334. Command name: SAVE >The SAVE command has succeeded. However, due to contention for the specified >file, the data have been saved to a file with a different name. >Saved to \\ssc-venus.uwo.pri\sscstudent$\ychiu29\Desktop\For Anova_1.sav. DATASET ACTIVATE DataSet2. DATASET ACTIVATE DataSet2. SAVE OUTFILE='\\ssc-venus.uwo.pri\sscstudent$\ychiu29\Desktop\For DV.sav' /COMPRESSED. >Warning # 5334. Command name: SAVE >The SAVE command has succeeded. However, due to contention for the specified >file, the data have been saved to a file with a different name. >Saved to \\ssc-venus.uwo.pri\sscstudent$\ychiu29\Desktop\For DV_1.sav.
Page 1
DATASET ACTIVATE DataSet1. DATASET CLOSE DataSet2. DATASET ACTIVATE DataSet1. SAVE OUTFILE='\\ssc-venus.uwo.pri\sscstudent$\ychiu29\Desktop\For Anova_1.sav' /COMPRESSED. UNIANOVA DV_PSQ BY IV1_Smell IV2_Music /METHOD=SSTYPE(3) /INTERCEPT=INCLUDE /EMMEANS=TABLES(IV1_Smell) /EMMEANS=TABLES(IV2_Music) /EMMEANS=TABLES(IV1_Smell*IV2_Music) /PRINT=DESCRIPTIVE HOMOGENEITY /CRITERIA=ALPHA(.05) /DESIGN=IV1_Smell IV2_Music IV1_Smell*IV2_Music.
Univariate Analysis of Variance
Notes
Output Created
Comments
Input Data
Active Dataset
Filter
Weight
Split File N of Rows in Working Data File
Missing Value Handling Definition of Missing
Cases Used
14-MAR-2017 17:33:37
\\ssc-venus.uwo. pri\sscstudent$\ychiu29\D esktop\For Anova_1.sav
DataSet1
<none>
<none>
<none>
38
User-defined missing values are treated as missing.
Statistics are based on all cases with valid data for all variables in the model.
Page 2
Notes
Syntax
Resources Processor Time
Elapsed Time
UNIANOVA DV_PSQ BY IV1_Smell IV2_Music /METHOD=SSTYPE(3) /INTERCEPT=INCLUDE /EMMEANS=TABLES (IV1_Smell) /EMMEANS=TABLES (IV2_Music) /EMMEANS=TABLES (IV1_Smell*IV2_Music) /PRINT=DESCRIPTIVE HOMOGENEITY /CRITERIA=ALPHA(.05) /DESIGN=IV1_Smell IV2_Music IV1_Smell*IV2_Music.
00:00:00.02
00:00:00.01
Between-Subjects Factors
N
IV1_Smell .00
1.00
IV2_Music .00
1.00
18
20
17
21
Descriptive Statistics Dependent Variable: DV_PSQDependent Variable: DV_PSQDependent Variable: DV_PSQ
IV1_Smell IV2_Music
DV_PSQ
Mean Std. Deviation N
.00 .00
1.00
Total
1.00 .00
1.00
Total
Total .00
1.00
Total
-2.5000 3.62531 8
1.3000 6.53282 10
-.3889 5.63747 18
1.3333 3.27872 9
2.5455 5.00727 11
2.0000 4.25503 20
-.4706 3.87488 17
1.9524 5.66989 21
.8684 5.03593 38
Dependent Variable: DV_PSQDependent Variable: DV_PSQ
Page 3
Levene's Test of Equality of Error Variancesa
Dependent Variable: DV_PSQDependent Variable: DV_PSQDependent Variable: DV_PSQ
F df1 df2 Sig.
.706 3 34 .555
Dependent Variable: DV_PSQDependent Variable: DV_PSQ
Tests the null hypothesis that the error variance of the dependent variable is equal across groups.
Design: Intercept + IV1_Smell + IV2_Music + IV1_Smell * IV2_Musica.
Tests of Between-Subjects Effects Dependent Variable: DV_PSQDependent Variable: DV_PSQDependent Variable: DV_PSQ
Source
DV_PSQ
Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Corrected Model
Intercept
IV1_Smell
IV2_Music
IV1_Smell * IV2_Music
Error
Total
Corrected Total
125.515a 3 41.838 1.750 .175
16.805 1 16.805 .703 .408
60.405 1 60.405 2.527 .121
58.829 1 58.829 2.461 .126
15.683 1 15.683 .656 .424
812.827 34 23.907
967.000 38
938.342 37
Dependent Variable: DV_PSQDependent Variable: DV_PSQ
R Squared = .134 (Adjusted R Squared = .057)a.
Estimated Marginal Means
1. IV1_Smell Dependent Variable: DV_PSQDependent Variable: DV_PSQDependent Variable:
IV1_Smell
Dependent Variable: DV_PSQ
Mean Std. Error 95% Confidence Interval
Lower Bound Upper Bound
.00
1.00
-.600 1.160 -2.957 1.757
1.939 1.099 -.294 4.172
Dependent Variable: DV_PSQDependent Variable: DV_PSQ
Page 4
2. IV2_Music Dependent Variable: DV_PSQDependent Variable: DV_PSQDependent Variable:
IV2_Music
Dependent Variable: DV_PSQ
Mean Std. Error 95% Confidence Interval
Lower Bound Upper Bound
.00
1.00
-.583 1.188 -2.997 1.831
1.923 1.068 -.248 4.094
Dependent Variable: DV_PSQDependent Variable: DV_PSQ
3. IV1_Smell * IV2_Music Dependent Variable: DV_PSQDependent Variable: DV_PSQDependent Variable: DV_PSQ
IV1_Smell IV2_Music
DV_PSQ
Mean Std. Error 95% Confidence Interval
Lower Bound Upper Bound
.00 .00
1.00
1.00 .00
1.00
-2.500 1.729 -6.013 1.013
1.300 1.546 -1.842 4.442
1.333 1.630 -1.979 4.646
2.545 1.474 -.451 5.541
Dependent Variable: DV_PSQDependent Variable: DV_PSQ
Page 5
- Log
- Univariate Analysis of Variance
- Title
- Notes
- Between-Subjects Factors
- Descriptive Statistics
- Levene's Test of Equality of Error Variances
- Tests of Between-Subjects Effects
- Estimated Marginal Means
- Title
- 1. IV1_Smell
- 2. IV2_Music
- 3. IV1_Smell * IV2_Music