final_draft_essay.doc

Running head: GUN CONTROL 1

GUN CONTROL 8

<Name>

<Course>

<Date>

<Instructor >

Gun control

Increasing restrictions on the civilian possession of guns is the channel to go regarding the reduction of crimes in America. Guns should be regulated from those who pursue to harm others and assessable to those who are qualified to protect our country .

Gun control is a controversial topic that provokes different emotions in people. Conversely, firearms are classified into three types: handguns, rifles, and shotguns. To understand the intensity of the topic, it is important to understand which population of America have direct access to firearms. Based on a survey data conducted in 2014, out of a population of 319 million people, there were 371 million firearms owned by private citizens and domestic law enforcement. Out of this, approximately 146 million were handguns. Handguns in this case comprised 52% of all guns sold to civilians (Miller, 2002). The levels of gun ownership were scattered in different groups partitioned as:

· Males: 45%

· Females: 15%

· Nonwhite: 22%

· Whites: 33%

· Independent: 31%

· Democrat: 22%

The logic behind gun ownership for 60% of the population was for protection against crime, 21% is used for target shooting and 36% for hunting. The paper will comprehensively cover the arguments for and against gun control in America.

Growing boundaries on private citizen ownership of firearms are unsettled, especially in the U.S. There are numerous legislations on firearm boundaries, the public is alarmed to the increase of guns and terrorist attacks in churches, schools and government facilities this endanger member of the public security. Over the past time span many have observed an unparalleled of escalation in fatalities caused by fire arms in the United States. Consequently, expanding the limits on fire arm possessions may decrease the high status of gun-related violence and death cases in the United States.

Due to the violence and subsequent deaths in the United States business and corporations that promote in firearms are likely to profit from the improved controls. The legislation and government of forbidden trade of fire arms will prohibit the maneuvers of the black markets indicating that corporations will gain from the raise of income that will come from the sale firearms (Blocher, & Miller, 2016).

Furthermore, the raise of limitations will help the examination process before allowing a person to attain a fire arm, guaranteeing the well-being of the citizen of the United States A background check will establish if an individual is mentally capable to purchase and own a fire arm. Demonstrating that they are responsibly to own it and to know when they should use it. Primarily, this limitation will warrant that an individual has been meticulously screened for any mentally or criminally behaviors (Blocher, & Miller, 2016).

With restrictions, this is will also confirm that businesses selling firearms are legally licensed avoiding the dishonest of the sales of firearms by merchants that are not authorized to sell. The main purpose is to assure that those who own fire arms are mentally sane and to eliminate in violate acts with firearms.

Those who choose to carry firearms will be limited of the freedom of demonstration and interaction. Subsequently, this is true of the recent attacks in our churches schools and other public places. Conversely, this is a graphic illustration of what introducing gun restrictions could achieve in the long run. Simply put, the President and Congress should see to it that there is control over the rights of citizens to bear firearms (Wolverton II, 2016).

The current limitations proposed on firearm belonging will bring about some serious monetary effects on weapon fabricating in the U.S. The expanded confinements could restrain the buy of guns; henceforth, lessen the salaries of people and the GDP over the long haul. Rather, the Federal government ought to utilize different methodologies when managing weapon related difficulties. For instance, presenting city lessons on firearm related issues as a suitable technique went for controlling the abuse of weapons in general society space (Anders, 2007).

The American people utilize guns for self-preservation from the dangers that range from nearby terrorist in the areas to outer hostilities. Generally, there is no measure of limitation ought to impede the natives from having firearms in the U.S. The expanded confinements significantly turn around the sort of firearms an individual can buy, a limitation on spots on can get a weapon and be conveyed, lastly confinements on the quantity of weapons one can purchase. Be that as it may, the legislature ought to take into genuine thought security worries before settling on choices on whether to acquaint thorough firearm statutes with the American open.

Likewise, developing of gun possession cutoff points will at last lessening the returns got from organizations that deliver weapon industry as just a couple of people will have the capacity to get to and buy firearms. For instance, the proposed weapon conveying laws that put a limitation on determined spots one can convey a firearm to goes for diminishing the quantity of people purchasing and conveying firearms. Also, increased restriction on gun ownership will increase the illegal trade of out of date and homemade guns. The implication of these illegal trading of guns is a possible reduction in gun revenue and increased violence from unmarked weapons. As such, these gun laws will be a waste of public resources because the burden of enacting these restrictions will be imposed on the legislators (Sanburn, Frizell, Alter, & Sifferlin 2015).

Additionally, the new gun restrictions will result in a reduced demand and ultimately, loss of revenue. Also, the increased guns regulations will possibly discourage other investors and manufacture who might be willing to venture into the U.S markets (Miller, 2002).

There is no single study likely to end the debate on guns’ control. By contrast, preventing law abiding citizens from carrying handguns does not solve crime and violence. Subsequently, what this act does is to make such people more venerable to attack. However, the opportunity to reduce murder rates entirely lies in the policies formulated by state and the central government. Repeatedly, calls have been made by politicians insisting that more laws against firearms can positively impact public safety. There are also calls for common sense gun controls such as a ban on high-capacity magazines, a system of universal background checks and a ban on assault weapons. Conversely, the side that a liberal individual decides to uphold depends on several variables an example of personal experiences and prejudice. The paper has comprehensively tackled both sides, but the underlying factor is that unlimited access to gun usage does more harm than good (Miller, 2002).

References

Blocher, J., & Miller, D. H. (2016). What Is Gun Control? Direct Burdens, Incidental

Burdens, and the Boundaries of the Second Amendment. University of Chicago

Law Review, 83(1), 295-355. Retrieved from:

http://eds.a.ebscohost.com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=90e43

d53-a073-4bd6-970d-ac4b49732ba9%40sessionmgr4009&vid=2&hid=4113

Sanburn, J., Frizell, S., Alter, C., & Sifferlin, A. (2015). A Familiar Tragedy Calls for

Unfamiliar Solutions. Time, 186(15), 11-13. Retrieved from:

http://eds.a.ebscohost.com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=6&sid=90e4 3d53-a073-4bd6-970d-ac4b49732ba9%40sessionmgr4009&hid=4113

Wolverton II, J. (2016). Obama's Right to Control Guns? New American (08856540),

32(3), 19-22. Retrieved from:

http://eds.a.ebscohost.com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=4&sid=90e43d53-a073-4bd6-970d-ac4b49732ba9%40sessionmgr4009&hid=4113

Anders, H. (2007). The UN Process on Small Arms: All Is Not Lost. Arms Control

Today, 37(2), 17.

Miller, D., Cukier, W., Vázquez, H., & Watson, C. (2002). Regulation of civilian

possession of small arms and light weapons.

You will want to make sure you address the following in your essay (750-1000 words). Should be 5-6 paragraphs.

First Draft:

INTRO Paragraph:

“ Introduce your topic

“ Create interest

“ Provide necessary background information

“ State your thesis at the end of the introductory paragraph

“ Preview the rest of your essay

See:

https://owl.english.purdue.edu/engagement/2/2/58/

Three Supporting Paragraphs:

“ Put only one main idea per paragraph.

“ Aim for five to six or more sentences per paragraph.

“ Make your paragraphs proportional to your paper.

“ If you have a few very short paragraphs, think about whether they are really parts of a larger paragraph-and can be combined-or whether you can add details to support each point and thus make each into a more fully developed paragraph.

“ Make sure each supporting paragraph includes facts with in-text citations to back up the sub argument.

“ Do not use the 1st or 2nd person pronouns: you, I, we, me, my, mine, us, our, you, your

“ Use only third person.

“ Do not write contractions in any part of your essay.

Paragraph(s) Refuting the Other Side

“ You need to refute the other side. You will need to be very well acquainted with the evidence and arguments for the other side of the argument you are making. This is an important part of an argumentative essay. You will need at least one paragraph where you address problems with your side and then show why those problems are no big deal or otherwise wrong interpretations of the situation. This should usually be at the end of a paper, right before the concluding paragraph.

Conclusion Paragraph:

“ Do not start the concluding paragraph with “In conclusion,” “In summary,” “Finally,” “Lastly,” or other such phrases

“ Restate your topic and why it is important,

“ Restate your thesis,

“ Call for action or give an overview of future research possibilities.

“ See http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/724/04/

In-Text Citations and References

“ Place on a new page at the end of your essay.

“ Follow the GCU Style Guide for writing in-text citations correctly.

“ In-text citations: http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/02/

“ Reference page:

http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/05/

“ Refer to the Handout Called References, APA Examples, and the GCU Style Guide. You can find them in our class by going to the tab called Resources and then click on Add-ons.

“ Make use of www.citationmachine.net To insure that your references and In-Text Citations are correct.

�Your heading should have each of these sections. It’ll be easier for you to meet little formatting requirements like this by using the template. You can find it in the Writing Center that’s under the Student Success Center tab.

� HYPERLINK "http://gcumedia.com/lms-resources/student-success-center/writing-center/index.html" �http://gcumedia.com/lms-resources/student-success-center/writing-center/index.html�

Use the GCU 100-200 Level Material

�Remember your introduction should be around 5 sentences and should address the following:

“ Introduce your topic

“ Create interest

“ Identify your main idea

“ Preview the rest of your essay

� HYPERLINK "https://owl.english.purdue.edu/engagement/2/2/58/" �https://owl.english.purdue.edu/engagement/2/2/58/�

�Remember that your thesis statement should be a single declarative sentence. Please take time to review and rework your thesis statement.

Include your topic, stance and three main points.

�This should be revised to fit the paragraph and cited.

�Each supporting main point should be supported with resources. Including resources helps strengthen your main points of your essay.

�Please open and review your Turnitin report prior to submitting your paper ---this is listed as a direct quotation yet you did not put it in double quotation marks. You do not want to inadvertently plagiarize.

�You want to paraphrase as much as possible. By paraphrasing you demonstrate that you understand the information well enough to put in into your own words.

�Please open and review your Turnitin report prior to submitting your paper ---this is listed as a direct quotation yet you did not put it in double quotation marks. You do not want to inadvertently plagiarize.

�You want to paraphrase as much as possible. By paraphrasing you demonstrate that you understand the information well enough to put in into your own words.

�Reference page should start on the next page.