nyanya - Assignment 4

assignment_4_rubix.docx

Home >Business & Finance homework help >Accounting homework help >nyanya - Assignment 4

for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.

Points: 320	Assignment 4: Changing the AIS
Criteria	Unacceptable Below 70% F	Fair 70-79% C	Proficient 80-89% B	Exemplary 90-100% A
1. Identify three to five (3-5) factors that contributed to the accounting information system failure within the business that you have identified. Indicate the impact to the business. Provide support for your rationale. Weight: 10%	Did not submit or incompletely identified three to five (3-5) factors that contributed to the accounting information system failure within the business that you have identified. Did not submit or incompletely indicated the impact to the business. Did not submit or incompletely provided support for your rationale.	Partially identified three to five (3-5) factors that contributed to the accounting information system failure within the business that you have identified. Partially indicated the impact to the business. Partially provided support for your rationale.	Satisfactorily identified three to five (3-5) factors that contributed to the accounting information system failure within the business that you have identified. Satisfactorily indicated the impact to the business. Satisfactorily provided support for your rationale.	Thoroughly identified three to five (3-5) factors that contributed to the accounting information system failure within the business that you have identified. Thoroughly indicated the impact to the business. Thoroughly provided support for your rationale.
2. Assess senior management responsibility for the failure in question. Specify what the senior management could have done differently to avoid the failure. Provide support for your rationale. Weight: 15%	Did not submit or incompletely assessed senior management responsibility for the failure in question. Did not submit or incompletely specified what the senior management could have done differently to avoid the failure. Did not submit or incompletely provided support for your rationale.	Partially assessed senior management responsibility for the failure in question. Partially specified what the senior management could have done differently to avoid the failure. Partially provided support for your rationale.	Satisfactorily assessed senior management responsibility for the failure in question. Satisfactorily specified what the senior management could have done differently to avoid the failure. Satisfactorily provided support for your rationale.	Thoroughly assessed senior management responsibility for the failure in question. Thoroughly specified what the senior management could have done differently to avoid the failure. Thoroughly provided support for your rationale.
3. Evaluate whether the most significant failure occurred within the system design, implementation, or operational phase of the process. Indicate what the company could have done to avoid the failed outcome. Provide support for your rationale. Weight: 15%	Did not submit or incompletely evaluated whether the most significant failure occurred within the system design, implementation, or operational phase of the process. Did not submit or incompletely indicated what the company could have done to avoid the failed outcome. Did not submit or incompletely provided support for your rationale.	Partially evaluated whether the most significant failure occurred within the system design, implementation, or operational phase of the process. Partially indicated what the company could have done to avoid the failed outcome. Partially provided support for your rationale.	Satisfactorily evaluated whether the most significant failure occurred within the system design, implementation, or operational phase of the process. Satisfactorily indicated what the company could have done to avoid the failed outcome. Satisfactorily provided support for your rationale.	Thoroughly evaluated whether the most significant failure occurred within the system design, implementation, or operational phase of the process. Thoroughly indicated what the company could have done to avoid the failed outcome. Thoroughly provided support for your rationale.
4. Evaluate how implementing best practices would have reduced the chances for failure. Provide support for your rationale. Weight: 15%	Did not submit or incompletely evaluated how implementing best practices would have reduced the chances for failure. Did not submit or incompletely provided support for your rationale.	Partially evaluated how implementing best practices would have reduced the chances for failure. Partially provided support for your rationale.	Satisfactorily evaluated how implementing best practices would have reduced the chances for failure. Satisfactorily provided support for your rationale.	Thoroughly evaluated how implementing best practices would have reduced the chances for failure. Thoroughly provided support for your rationale.
5. Based on your research, develop a list of between four (4) and six (6) best practices that organizations should use today to reduce the chances for failure. Provide support for your rationale. Weight: 15%	Did not submit or incompletely developed a list of between four (4) and six (6) best practices that organizations should use today to reduce the chances for failure, based on your research. Did not submit or incompletely provided support for your rationale.	Partially developed a list of between four (4) and six (6) best practices that organizations should use today to reduce the chances for failure, based on your research. Partially provided support for your rationale.	Satisfactorily developed a list of between four (4) and six (6) best practices that organizations should use today to reduce the chances for failure, based on your research. Satisfactorily provided support for your rationale.	Thoroughly developed a list of between four (4) and six (6) best practices that organizations should use today to reduce the chances for failure, based on your research. Thoroughly provided support for your rationale.
6. Using the information provided by IBM and others, indicate which of the principles designed to provide insight into effective and efficient strategies on how to best deploy financial management systems, which were outlined within the related article, should serve as an example of what not to do when establishing the foundation for a firm to follow. Your proposed foundation should consist of at least two (2) principles, but no more than six (6). Provide support for your rationale. Weight: 15%	Did not submit or incompletely indicated which of the principles designed to provide insight into effective and efficient strategies on how to best deploy financial management systems, which were outlined within the related article, should serve as an example of what not to do when establishing the foundation for a firm to follow, using the information provided by the IBM and others. Did not submit or incompletely provided support for your rationale.	Partially indicated which of the principles designed to provide insight into effective and efficient strategies on how to best deploy financial management systems, which were outlined within the related article, should serve as an example of what not to do when establishing the foundation for a firm to follow, using the information provided by the IBM and others. Partially provided support for your rationale.	Satisfactorily indicated which of the principles designed to provide insight into effective and efficient strategies on how to best deploy financial management systems, which were outlined within the related article, should serve as an example of what not to do when establishing the foundation for a firm to follow, using the information provided by the IBM and others. Satisfactorily provided support for your rationale.	Thoroughly indicated which of the principles designed to provide insight into effective and efficient strategies on how to best deploy financial management systems, which were outlined within the related article, should serve as an example of what not to do when establishing the foundation for a firm to follow, using the information provided by the IBM and others. Thoroughly provided support for your rationale.
7. 3 references Weight: 5%	No references provided	Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices.	Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.	Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.
8. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements Weight: 10%	More than 6 errors present	5-6 errors present	3-4 errors present	0-2 errors prese