Urgent 2
Peer Review Assignment Due Week 8 and worth 50 points
Peer reviews should provide feedback to a peer on the criteria expected in the paper. The Week 8 Feedback Form can be downloaded from the Appendices section of the course guide by clicking the link here . Follow these instructions:
For Online Students:
1. Choose a classmate's paper from the "Easy Drop off/Pick up Zone" discussion thread in the course shell.
2. Obtain the Peer Review Feedback Form from the course shell.
3. Comment on all criteria, noting strengths and / or areas for improvement on the feedback form.
4. Provide completed Peer Review Feedback Form by posting it to the same "Easy Drop off/Pick up Zone" discussion thread AND submitting it to the Peer Review Assignment link above.
For On-ground Students:
1. Receive a classmate’s paper from your professor.
2. Obtain the Peer Review Feedback Form from the course shell.
3. Comment on all criteria, noting strengths and / or areas for improvement on the feedback form.
4. Provide completed Peer Review Feedback Form and classmate’s paper as directed by your professor.
Note: On-ground students should submit the feedback form and paper to the professor during the class meeting in which the paper is reviewed; online students should submit the feedback form and paper to the professor via the "Easy Drop off/Pick up Zone" discussion thread and Peer Review Assignment link in the course shell.
As you read a classmate’s paper, address these criteria:
· Identify the course, assignment, and date.
· Provide positive feedback, where appropriate, on the criteria.
· Identify areas for improvement, where appropriate, and recommend improvements.
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
· Recognize the elements and correct use of a thesis statement.
· Recognize transitional words, phrases, and sentences.
· Identify effective sentence variety and word choice.
· Identify positive qualities and opportunities for improvement in writing samples.
· Analyze the rhetorical strategies of ethos, pathos, logos in writing samples and for incorporation into essays or presentations.
· Correct grammatical and stylistic errors consistent with Standard Written English
· Recognize how to organize ideas with transitional words, phrases, and sentences.
Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic/organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.
|
Points: 50 |
Assignment: Peer Review |
||||
|
Criteria |
Unacceptable Below 60% F |
Meets Minimum Expectations 60-69% D |
Fair 70-79% C |
Proficient 80-89% B |
Exemplary 90-100% A |
|
1. Identify the course, assignment, and date. Weight: 10% |
Did not submit or incompletely identified the course, assignment, and date. |
Insufficiently identified the course, assignment, and date. |
Partially identified the course, assignment, and date. |
Satisfactorily identified the course, assignment, and date. |
Thoroughly identified the course, assignment, and date. |
|
2. Give positive feedback on the criteria where appropriate. Weight: 45% |
Did not submit or incompletely gave positive feedback on the criteria where appropriate. |
Insufficiently gave positive feedback on the criteria where appropriate. |
Partially gave positive feedback on the criteria where appropriate. |
Satisfactorily gave positive feedback on the criteria where appropriate. |
Thoroughly gave positive feedback on the criteria where appropriate. |
|
3. Identify areas for improvement, where appropriate. Weight: 45% |
Did not submit or incompletely identified areas for improvement, where appropriate. |
Insufficiently identified areas for improvement, where appropriate. |
Partially identified areas for improvement, where appropriate. |
Satisfactorily identified areas for improvement, where appropriate. |
Thoroughly identified areas for improvement, where appropriate. |