Assignment 2: Project -Final Project Summary
NOTE: If a component is absent, student receives a zero for that component.
Rubric
|
|
Unsatisfactory 1 |
Emerging 2 |
Proficient 3 |
Exemplary 4 |
Score |
|
Assignment Components |
|||||
|
Clearly identified a nursing problem with a budgetary impact. |
Lacked identification of a nursing problem with a budgetary impact. |
Provided a minimal identification of a nursing problem with a budgetary impact. |
Provided a solid identification of a nursing problem with a budgetary impact. |
Provided a thorough, indepth identification of a nursing problem with a budgetary impact. |
[Score x 10 = 40 pts] |
|
Provided a detailed analysis of the problem. |
Lacked a detailed analysis of the problem. |
Provided a minimal detailed analysis of the problem. |
Provided a detailed analysis of the problem. |
Provided a thorough and detailed analysis of the problem. |
[Score x 10 = 40 pts]
|
|
Provided a potential solution to the identified problem. |
Lacked a potential solution to the identified problem. |
Provided a minimal discussion about a potential solution to the identified problem. |
Provided a satisfactory discussion about a potential solution to the identified problem. |
Provided a thorough discussion about two or more potential solutions to the identified problem. |
[Score x 5 = 20 pts]
|
|
Used sound budgetary principles in the development of the solution for the problem. |
Lacked the use of sound budgetary principles in the development of the solution for the problem. |
Provided minimal information about sound budgetary principles in the development of the solution for the problem. |
Provided sufficient information about sound budgetary principles in the development of the solution for the problem. |
Provided thorough information about sound budgetary principles in the development of the solution for the problem. |
[Score x 5 = 20 pts]
|
|
Demonstrated an integration of information technology in the solution to the problem, including but not limited to advanced computer systems, electronic health records and nursing information systems. |
Lacked a demonstration of an integration of information technology in the solution to the problem, including but not limited to advanced computer systems, electronic health records and nursing information systems. |
Provided a minimal demonstration of an integration of information technology in the solution to the problem, including but not limited to advanced computer systems, electronic health records and nursing information systems. |
Provided an acceptable demonstration of an integration of information technology in the solution to the problem, including but not limited to advanced computer systems, electronic health records and nursing information systems. |
Provided a thorough demonstration of an integration of information technology in the solution to the problem, including but not limited to advanced computer systems, electronic health records and nursing information systems. |
Score x 5 = 20 pts] |
|
Provided a comprehensive list of references, including peer-reviewed publications. |
Lacked a comprehensive list of references, including peer-reviewed publications. |
Provided a minimal list of references, including peer-reviewed publications. |
Provided a comprehensive list of three references, including peer-reviewed publications. |
Provided at thorough comprehensive list of three or more references, including peer-reviewed publications. |
Score x 5 = 20 pts] |
|
Slides and notes are well developed and easy to read. |
Lacked slides and notes. |
Provided a minimal number ofslides and notes and were not easy to read. |
Provided a sufficient amount of slides and notes and were easy to read. |
Provided ample, quality slides and notes and were easy to read. |
Score x 5 = 20 pts] |
|
Writing Components |
|||||
|
Used APA style (which includes grammar, spelling, and punctuation, as well as formatting). |
Introduction is limited or missing entirely. Poorly organized document. Transitions are infrequent, illogical, or missing entirely. Conclusion is limited or missing entirely. Writing contains numerous errors in spelling, grammar, or sentence structure that severely interferes with readability and comprehension. No attempt at APA formatting. |
Introduction is present but incomplete or underdeveloped. Poorly organized document that interferes with readability and comprehension. Transitions are sporadic. Conclusion is present, but incomplete or underdeveloped. Writing contains numerous errors in spelling, grammar, or sentence structure that somewhat interfere with readability or comprehension. APA format is attempted to paraphrase, quote, and cite, but errors are significant. |
Introduction has a clear opening, provides background information, and states the topic. Loosely organized document that may haveto be inferred. Transitions are appropriate and help the flow of ideas. Conclusion summarizes main argument and has a clear ending. Writing follows conventions of spelling and grammar throughout. Errors are infrequent and do not interfere with readability or comprehension. APA format is attempted to paraphrase, quote, and cite, but few errors are present. |
Introduction catches the reader’s attention, provides compelling and appropriate background information, and clearly states the topic. Well organized document with an appropriate introduction. Transitions are thoughtful and clearly show how ideas relate. Conclusion leaves the reader with a sense of closure and provides concluding insights. Writing follows conventions of spelling and grammar throughout that helps establish a clear idea and aid the reader in following the writer’s logic. APA format is used throughout when appropriate or called for. |
Score x 5 = 20 pts] |
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
Timeliness
|
|
|
|
|
Late Work penalty: |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Score |
/ 200
|
NSG4064 Week 5 Assignment 2 Grading Rubric 1