Macro w3

profilenikke.teriha
written_feedback_form_2.doc

Written Assignment Feedback

Student/Group Name(s)

Course

Date

Assignment

Content/Development

Subject Matter: (30%)

· Key elements of assignments covered

· Content is comprehensive/accurate/persuasive

· Displays an understanding of relevant theory

· Major points supported by specific details/examples

· Research is adequate/timely

· Writer has gone beyond textbook for resources

Higher-Order Thinking: (20%)

· Writer compares/contrasts/integrates theory/subject matter with work environment/experience

· At an appropriate level, the writer analyzes and synthesizes theory/practice to develop new ideas and ways of conceptualizing and performing

Organization

· The introduction provides a sufficient background on the topic and previews major points

· Central theme/purpose is immediately clear

· Structure is clear, logical, and easy to follow

· Subsequent sections develop/support the central theme

· Conclusion/recommendations follow logically from the body of the paper

(20%)

Style/Mechanics

Format--10%

· Citations/reference page follow guidelines

· Properly cites ideas/info from other sources

· Paper is laid out effectively--uses, heading and other reader-friendly tools

· Paper is neat/shows attention to detail

Grammar/Punctuation/Spelling--10%

· Rules of grammar, usage, punctuation are followed

· Spelling is correct

Readability/Style--10%

· Sentences are complete, clear, and concise

· Sentences are well-constructed with consistently strong, varied structure

· Transitions between sentences/paragraphs/sections help maintain the flow of thought

· Words used are precise and unambiguous

· The tone is appropriate to the audience, content, and assignment

Comments / Grade

Revised March 2001