Macro w3
Written Assignment Feedback
|
Student/Group Name(s) Course |
Date Assignment |
Content/Development
|
Subject Matter: (30%) · Key elements of assignments covered · Content is comprehensive/accurate/persuasive · Displays an understanding of relevant theory · Major points supported by specific details/examples · Research is adequate/timely · Writer has gone beyond textbook for resources |
|
|
Higher-Order Thinking: (20%) · Writer compares/contrasts/integrates theory/subject matter with work environment/experience · At an appropriate level, the writer analyzes and synthesizes theory/practice to develop new ideas and ways of conceptualizing and performing
|
|
Organization
|
· The introduction provides a sufficient background on the topic and previews major points · Central theme/purpose is immediately clear · Structure is clear, logical, and easy to follow · Subsequent sections develop/support the central theme · Conclusion/recommendations follow logically from the body of the paper (20%)
|
|
Style/Mechanics
|
Format--10% · Citations/reference page follow guidelines · Properly cites ideas/info from other sources · Paper is laid out effectively--uses, heading and other reader-friendly tools · Paper is neat/shows attention to detail
Grammar/Punctuation/Spelling--10% · Rules of grammar, usage, punctuation are followed · Spelling is correct Readability/Style--10% · Sentences are complete, clear, and concise · Sentences are well-constructed with consistently strong, varied structure · Transitions between sentences/paragraphs/sections help maintain the flow of thought · Words used are precise and unambiguous · The tone is appropriate to the audience, content, and assignment |
|
Comments / Grade
|
|
Revised March 2001