DUE: 2/2/2017 @ 9 am est.

DUE: 2/2/2017 @ 9 a

m est. ((one page for $7)) **please charge the whole $7.

THXS!

Resource Reading

—

How to Read a Case and Research Article

Carefully examine “How to Read a Research Article” from Section II of your text (Spohn &

Hemmens

, 2012, pp. 42

-

45). Using the 10 criteria for review found in the text, prepare a critical

analysis of

one of the four

articles which immediately follow the analyses techniques:

·

“The Process Is the Punishment: Handling Cases in a Lower Criminal Court” (Fee

ley,

1971, as cited in Spohn & Hemmens, 2012, pp. 46

-

55);

·

“The Honest Politician’s Guide to Juvenile Justice in the Twenty

-

First Century” (Feld,

1994, as cited in Spohn & Hemmens, 2012, pp. 55

-

67);

·

“The Rehnquist Court and Criminal Justice: An Empirical Assessment” (Smith, 2003, as

cited in Spohn & Hemmens, 2012, pp. 67

-

83); or

·

“Wrongful Conviction: Perceptions of Criminal Justice Professionals Regarding the

Frequency of Wrongful Conviction and the

Extent of System Errors” (Ramsey & Frank,

2007, as cited in Spo

hn & Hemmens, 2012, pp. 83

-

107)

DUE: 2/2/2017 @ 9 am est. ((one page for $7)) **please charge the whole $7.

THXS!

Resource Reading—How to Read a Case and Research Article

Carefully examine “How to Read a Research Article” from Section II of your text (Spohn &

Hemmens, 2012, pp. 42-45). Using the 10 criteria for review found in the text, prepare a critical

analysis of one of the four articles which immediately follow the analyses techniques:

 “The Process Is the Punishment: Handling Cases in a Lower Criminal Court” (Feeley,

1971, as cited in Spohn & Hemmens, 2012, pp. 46-55);

 “The Honest Politician’s Guide to Juvenile Justice in the Twenty-First Century” (Feld,

1994, as cited in Spohn & Hemmens, 2012, pp. 55-67);

 “The Rehnquist Court and Criminal Justice: An Empirical Assessment” (Smith, 2003, as

cited in Spohn & Hemmens, 2012, pp. 67-83); or

 “Wrongful Conviction: Perceptions of Criminal Justice Professionals Regarding the

Frequency of Wrongful Conviction and the Extent of System Errors” (Ramsey & Frank,

2007, as cited in Spohn & Hemmens, 2012, pp. 83-107)