for Sir_Excellence
1
Running head: FOREIGN AMERICAN POLICY
3
FOREIGN AMERICAN POLICY
Instructions
Global Societal Problem, Argument and Solution
Prepare: The topic of your essay needs to be a global societal problem from the following list: adult illiteracy, funding for General Education vs STEM in primary and secondary schools, minimum wage, oceans desertification, overcoming the digital divide, refugee (escaping persecution, war, or death) crises, species extinctions (modern), tax havens, Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP), universal statement of human rights (pick one), airport security, or wealth disparity. Review this GEN499 Sample Final Paper Guide for additional guidance on the expectations of this assignment. Reflect: Based on the topic that you have chosen, you will need to use critical thinking skills to thoroughly understand how this topic can be a global societal problem and determine some logical solution(s) to the problem. Write: This Final Argumentative Essay will present research relating the critical thinker to the modern, globalized world. In this assignment, you need to address the following items in separate sections with new headings for each:
· Identify the global societal problem within the introductory paragraph and conclude with a thesis statement that states your proposed solution(s) to the problem. For guidance on how to construct a good introduction paragraph, please review the Introduction Paragraph Guideline from the Ashford Writing Center.
· Describe background information on how that problem developed or came into existence. Show why this is a societal problem, and provide perspectives from multiple disciplines or populations so that you fully represent what different parts of society have to say about this issue.
· Construct an argument supporting your proposed solution(s). Be sure to consider multiple disciplines or populations so that your solution shows that multiple parts of society will benefit from this solution. Provide evidence from multiple scholarly sources as evidence that your proposed solution is viable.
· Interpret statistical data from at least three, peer-reviewed scholarly sources. Do this by discussing the validity, reliability, and any biases; identifying the strengths and weaknesses of these sources; and pointing out limitations of current research and attempting to indicate areas for future research. You may even use visual representations such as graphs or charts to explain statistics from sources. Evaluate the ethical outcomes that result from your solution. Be sure to provide at least one positive ethical outcome as well as at least one negative ethical outcome that could result from your solution, and explain at least two ethical issues related to each of those outcomes. It’s important to consider all of society.
· Develop a conclusion as the last paragraph(s) of the essay, starting with rephrasing your thesis statement and then presenting the major points of the topic and how they support your argument. For guidance on how to write a good conclusion paragraph, please review the Conclusion Paragraph Guideline from the Ashford Writing Center.
The Final Argumentative Essay
· Must be 3,300 – 3,900 words in length (approximately between 10 – 12 pages; excluding title and reference pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
· Must include a separate title page with the following:
· Title of paper
· Student’s name
· Course name and number
· Instructor’s name
· Date submitted
· Running header with page numbers
· Must include in-text citations from at least 10 scholarly sources. Be sure to integrate your research rather than simply inserting it.
· Must document all sources in APA style as outlined here and here.
· Must have no more than 15% quoted material in the body of your essay based on the Turnitin report. Reference list will be excluded from the Turnitin originality score.
· Must include a separate reference page that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
· Source Document Requirements:
· Multimedia sources (such as videos) may be used, but no more than two such sources may be used. If multimedia sources are used, they must be authored and distributed by credible sources, such as universities, law schools, medical schools, or professors, or found in the Ashford University Library.
· Government sources may be used, but no more than two such sources may be used. Examples include whitehouse.gov, state.gov, usa.gov, cdc.gov, etc. These websites can be used to make a stronger point about your proposed soluation within the argument.
· Where print documents are used for source materials, those must be peer-reviewed, scholarly journal articles, and academically published books. Popular media sources (e.g., newspapers, magazines, television and radio shows, etc.) must not be used. Materials from advocacy groups (e.g., Greenpeace, Human Rights Campaign, National Organization for Women, etc.) must not be used.
· Sites such as ProCon.org and Wikipedia must not be used.
· Religious texts must not be used.
Good Critical Thinking Tips:
· Your paper should include academic sources that explain multiple sides of the issue.
· Your interpretations of the evidence should be objective and state the conclusions and theses presented in the evidence clearly and fairly.
· Your paper should place the various forms of evidence in relation to one another and demonstrate why one form or perspective is stronger than the other positions that one could take on the issue.
· Your paper should point out the limitations of current evidence and attempt to indicate areas for future research.
· Writing Tools:
· Before you submit your written assignment, you are encouraged to review the The Grammarly Guide: How to Set Up & Use Grammarly tutorial, set up a Grammarly account (if you have not already done so), and use Grammarly to review a rough draft of your assignment. Then carefully review all issues identified by Grammarly and revise your work as needed.
Foreign American Policy
By
Name:
Institution:
Abstract
This paper describes the American foreign policy and the elements for general foreign policy in America. It gives a detail analysis of the various current stages in foreign policy. America's direct of foreign policy requests that, as a country, the paper address the double substances of new dangers and openings in a world that are more associated and related, where innovation has overshadowed transitional understandings of outskirts and security. The person in charge of the foreign policy is described in the paper.
What is Foreign Policy?
A nation's foreign policy comprise of self-intrigue techniques singled out by the country to guard its national benefit and to achieve its particular objectives through foreign affairs with different nations (Mintz & DeRouen, 2010). The policies are intentionally utilized to correlate with various countries. The foreign policy of the United States is the route in which it collaborates with foreign nation and sets gauges of association for its associations, companies and individual nationals of the United States.
Looking at the foreign approach of the U.S and the route in that it incorporates foreign countries and where it sets policies of collaboration for its organizations, companies and natives of the United States. The paper focus on the commandingly articulated aims of the foreign policy of the United States, together with the Bureaus and Offices in the U.S sector of State, as precise in the Foreign Policy plan of the sector of State, which include; to construct and manage a further fame based, safe and sound, and thriving country for the benefit of the U.S citizens and the worldwide community at large (Gelb, 2009).
What's more, the United States commission for Foreign Affairs states as various of its jurisdictional goals: trade management, together with constraint of atomic modernization and its equipment; measures to encourage business connection with foreign nations and to preserve American business overseas; global product assertions; international teaching; and safety measures of American citizen who are abroad. U.S. foreign strategy and foreign policy have been the matter of many levels of argument, recommendation, and opinion, both in the vicinity and out of the country.
The primary pattern with respect to the historical backdrop of U.S. foreign policy since the American Revolution is the move starting non-interventionism preceding and subsequently World War I, to its progress as a power to be reckoned with and global authority amid and from World War II and the closing stages of the Cold War in the 20th century. Since the nineteenth century, U.S. outside arrangement additionally has been described by a move from the realist school to the hopeful or Wilsonian school of worldwide relations (Gaddis, 2005).
The foreign policy scheme bunches which are household backing organizations looking to specifically or in a roundabout way impact the administration's remote arrangement, are a key player in U.S. foreign policy.
As indicated by U.S. researcher John Dietrich, these premium groups have assembled to articulate to a diverse cluster of industry, work, racial, human rights, natural, and various associations. With a specific end goal to fabricate and maintain their contact, as they utilize various policies, for example, encircling the issue and molding the terms of discussion; submission of information and investigation to choose delegates who might not have sufficient energy to examine the issue himself or herself; and observing the arrangement procedure and responding to it through spreading supplementary data, letter-composing effort, requiring extra hearings or enactment, and supporting or restricting applicants amid decisions.
Foreign policy conspiracy amasses regularly cover with alleged "ethnic" intrigue bunches, as they attempt to impact the remote arrangement and, to a lesser degree, the local approach of the United States for the improvement of the foreign ethnic family or nation with particular ethnic gatherings recognize. In spite of the fact that ethnic intrigue bunches have stayed for a lengthy time and have twisted into a persuasive marvel from the time when the end of the Cold War.
What are the Components of Foreign Policy?
Foreign approach is intended to secure the national interests of the state. The current remote policy has turned out to be very perplexing. Previously, the remote policy may have concerned itself fundamentally with policies exclusively identified with national intrigue - for instance, military power or settlements. At present, the remote arrangement includes exchange, fund, human rights, natural, and social issues. These issues, somehow, affect how nations cooperate with each other and how they seek after their political advantages around the world.
Who Is in Charge of Foreign Policy?
For the most part, making foreign policy is assigned to the head of government and the foreign clergyman (or proportionate). In a few nations, the governing body likewise has effective oversight. In the U.S, foreign policy is made and completed by the official area office, especially the head president, through the state security analyst, the State section, the Defense section, the Department of Homeland Security, and the insight organizations. The Security Act of 1947 and late bureaucratic rearrangement after 9/11 reshaped the organization of foreign policy making.
The U.S. Secretary of State is similar with the foreign minister of various countries and is the authority accused of state-to-state policy, in spite of the fact that the president has extreme power over foreign arrangement.
The foreign policy of the U.S is the path in which it associates with foreign countries. The foreign policy sets measures of collaboration for its associations, companies, and original natives. There are few dreams of foreign approach in the U.S. are noninterference and internationalism, which has been prevailing from the time when World War II began. The principle foreign policy amid the Cold War was regulation, discouragement, détente and the utilization of military drive like in Vietnam (Combs, 2012).
U.S. foreign approach is broad because the United States is the worldwide superpower and world pioneer. It works in a world assailed by starvation, destitution, ailment, and fiascoes both regular torrents, seismic tremors) and human-made (environmental change, contamination of the water and sky, and entrance of radioactive equipment from atomic undergrowth.
Different places in the world are abused by genocide, local and ethnic strife, and displaced people. Psychological warfare, clashes in Iraq and Afghanistan, the atomic armaments projects of Iran and Korea, the expansion of weapons of heap annihilation, the Arab-Israeli clash, and insecurity and difficulties to leaders in the Middle East are just the mainly evident of the foreign approach issues that influence the United States (Perkovich, 2003). Others issues incorporate monetary changes, the ascent of China to global financial and political control, relations with Russia, HIV and AIDS in Africa, reliance on oil from non-popularity based countries, the importation of unlawful medications, and the yearly U.S. exchange shortfall of around $800 billion.
In order to get ready for these foreign policy problems, U.S. military uses are huge. The yearly resistance spending plan is close to 1.4 trillion dollars. There are formal or casual understandings to safeguard over 30 countries. It has more than 1000 army bases abroad in roughly 140 countries. The United States is phenomenally dynamic, regularly militarily, on worldwide issues. From 1989, it has mediated in various countries in Asia, Middle East and Africa.
Since the introduction of the country, motivations of the domain have been near the heart of the United States. How these desires collaborate with the way the nation comprehends itself, and the way of the different interests at work in the unfurling of American foreign policy is a subject quite bantered about and still dark. In a crisp take a gander at the issue, Anderson outlines the interlaced recorded advancement of America's supreme reach and its part as the general underwriter of capital.
The inward strains that have emerged are followed by the end phases of the World War II during the Cold War to the War on Terror. Regardless of the annihilation and disposal of the USSR, the planetary structures for fighting and reconnaissance have not been withdrawn but rather augmented.
Presidential decisions from time to time convey significant change to American remote arrangement. Generally, notwithstanding when control of the White House has gone from one of the two noteworthy political gatherings to the next regardless of how remarkably the approaching President has condemned the foreign strategies of his forerunner at first there has been significant congruity in the country's relations with whatever is left of the world.
References
Gelb, L. H. (2009). Power rules: How common sense can rescue American foreign policy (p. 180). New York: Harper.
Gaddis, J. L. (2005). Strategies of containment: a critical appraisal of American national security policy during the Cold War. Oxford University Press.
Combs, J. A. (2012). The history of American foreign policy from 1895 (4th ed.). United States: M.E. Sharpe.
Perkovich, G. (2003). Can Iran and the United States bridge the gulf? Foreign Policy65. doi:10.2307/3183695
Mintz, A., & DeRouen, K. (2010). Understanding foreign policy decision making. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.