Need Paper Written - Must follow the instructions

1 Unsatisfactory 0.00%

2 Less than Satisfactory 74.00%

3 Satisfactory 79.00%

4 Good 87.00%

5 Excellent 100.00%

75.0 %Content

10.0 %Evaluation of Power Bases

Evaluation of power bases used by the leader affiliated with a current ethics-related issue is absent, inappropriate, or irrelevant.

Evaluation of power bases used by the leader affiliated with a current ethics-related issue is weak or marginal with gaps in presentation.

Evaluation of power bases used by the leader affiliated with a current ethics-related issue is provided, but at a cursory level.

Evaluation of power bases used by the leader affiliated with a current ethics-related issue is clear and integrated.

Evaluation of power bases used by the leader affiliated with a current ethics-related issue is thorough and well integrated.

10.0 %Evaluation of Influence Tactics

Evaluation of influence tactics used by the leader is absent, inappropriate, or irrelevant.

Evaluation of influence tactics used by the leader is weak or marginal with gaps in presentation.

Evaluation of influence tactics used by the leader is provided, but at a cursory level.

Evaluation of influence tactics used by the leader is clear and integrated.

Evaluation of influence tactics used by the leader is thorough and well integrated.

10.0 %Evaluation of Leadership Style

Evaluation of leadership style, effectiveness, and whether the leader supports the values of conscious capitalism is absent, inappropriate, or irrelevant.

Evaluation of leadership style, effectiveness, and whether the leader supports the values of conscious capitalism is weak or marginal with gaps in presentation.

Evaluation of leadership style, effectiveness, and whether the leader supports the values of conscious capitalism is provided, but at a cursory level.

Evaluation of leadership style, effectiveness, and whether the leader supports the values of conscious capitalism is clear and integrated.

Evaluation of leadership style, effectiveness, and whether the leader supports the values of conscious capitalism is thorough and well integrated.

10.0 %Evaluation of Outcome

Evaluation of the outcome or potential outcome of the situation is absent, inappropriate, or irrelevant.

Evaluation of the outcome or potential outcome of the situation is weak or marginal with gaps in presentation.

Evaluation of the outcome or potential outcome of the situation is provided, but at a cursory level. There is some explanation to show the impact the leader has on organizational outcomes.

Evaluation of the outcome or potential outcome of the situation is clear and integrated. There is a complete explanation to show the impact the leader has on organizational outcomes.

Evaluation of the outcome or potential outcome of the situation is thorough and well integrated. There is detailed evidence to show the impact the leader has on organizational outcomes.

10.0 %Servant Leadership Discussion

A discussion of servant leadership, how the situation would be different with respect to power bases, influence tactics, and leadership style, as well as an explanation of how personal values are influenced by conscious capitalism, is absent, inappropriate, or irrelevant.

A discussion of servant leadership, how the situation would be different with respect to power bases, influence tactics, and leadership style, as well as an explanation of how personal values are influenced by conscious capitalism, is weak or marginal with gaps in presentation.

A discussion of servant leadership, how the situation would be different with respect to power bases, influence tactics, and leadership style, as well as an explanation of how personal values are influenced by conscious capitalism, is provided, but at a cursory level.

A discussion of servant leadership, how the situation would be different with respect to power bases, influence tactics, and leadership style, as well as an explanation of how personal values are influenced by conscious capitalism, is clear and integrated.

A discussion of servant leadership, how the situation would be different with respect to power bases, influence tactics, and leadership style, as well as an explanation of how personal values are influenced by conscious capitalism, is thorough and well integrated.

25.0 %Leadership Philosophy Statement

There is no leadership philosophy statement included.

The leadership philosophy statement is included, but lacks details or is incomplete.

The leadership philosophy statement includes personal views, past experiences, expectations of self and others, and a personal leadership style, but requires further details.

The detailed leadership philosophy statement incorporates all required elements. There is an explanation of how the student views own leadership style, how others view the leadership style of the student, and how this contributes to the success of an organization.

The detailed leadership philosophy statement incorporates all required elements and specific leadership examples. There is a clear explanation of how the student views own leadership style, how other view the leadership style of the student, and how this contributes to the success of an organization.

15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

5.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.

Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.

Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

5.0 %Argument Logic and Construction

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

10.0 %Format

5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.

Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

All format elements are correct.

5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

Sources are not documented.

Documentation of sources is inconsistent and/or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

100 %Total Weightage