sample.docx

Discussion - Week 7

Quantitative Reasoning and Analysis (RSCH - 8201Z - 1)

Discussion - Week 7

Research Design for One-Way ANOVA

Student: Agha Bakht, [email protected]

Student ID # A00136458

Program: PhD in Management

Specialization: Leadership and Organizational Change

Faculty: Dr. Tom Spencer: [email protected]

Walden University

January 11, 2017

Hi Dr. Thomas Spencer,

Discussion - Week 7

Research Design for One-Way ANOVA

In response to discussion for the week 7, I used General Social Survey Data to construct a research questions and answered by ANOVA. In the day 3 posting please see below responses.

Q: 1 what is your research question?

There is a correlation between the Groups and within Groups. Sum of squares for Groups=474058.682, within Groups=743670.506 and Total=1217729.188.

Q: 2 what is the null hypothesis for your question?

In the research hypothesis there is a correlation between the Groups and within Groups. Sum of squares for Groups=474058.682, within Groups=743670.506 and Total=1217729.188. In the null hypothesis mean square relation is calculated between the group=118514.671 and within Groups=307.048.

Q: 3 what research design would align with this question?

A quantitative research method would be the ideal research design for this question, specifically because it is an analysis of the correlation between two variables (R's socioeconomic index (2010) and sei10.

Q: 4 what dependent variable was used and how is it measured?

R's socioeconomic index (2010).

Q: 5 what independent variable is used and how is it measured?

sei10.

Q: 6 if you found significance, what is the strength of the effect?

The significance level is .000, which is well below ONEWAY sei10 BY degree

/MISSING ANALYSIS/POSTHOC=BONFERRONI GH ALPHA (0.05).

Q: 7 explain your results for a lay audience and further explain what the answer is to your research question.

Based upon the post hoc test it is determined that we have to reject our null hypothesis that Bonferroni and Games-Howell

HIGH SCHOOL

LT HIGH SCHOOL

10.6923*

1.1432

.000

JUNIOR COLLEGE

-9.2956*

1.3924

.000

BACHELOR

-21.7874*

.9580

.000

GRADUATE

-35.5267*

1.1732

.000

GET

FILE='D:\Walden_RSCH-820Z-1\Assignment\GSS2014_agha bakht_8210 (1).sav'.

DATASET NAME DataSet1 WINDOW=FRONT.

ONEWAY sei10 BY degree

/MISSING ANALYSIS.

Oneway

[DataSet1] D:\Walden_RSCH-820Z-1\Assignment\GSS2014_agha bakht_8210 (1).sav

ANOVA

R's socioeconomic index (2010)

Sum of Squares

df

Mean Square

F

Sig.

Between Groups

474058.682

4

118514.671

385.981

.000

Within Groups

743670.506

2422

307.048

Total

1217729.188

2426

ONEWAY sei10 BY degree

/MISSING ANALYSIS

/POSTHOC=BONFERRONI GH ALPHA(0.05).

Oneway

ANOVA

R's socioeconomic index (2010)

Sum of Squares

df

Mean Square

F

Sig.

Between Groups

474058.682

4

118514.671

385.981

.000

Within Groups

743670.506

2422

307.048

Total

1217729.188

2426

Post Hoc Tests

Multiple Comparisons

Dependent Variable: R's socioeconomic index (2010)

(I) RS HIGHEST DEGREE

(J) RS HIGHEST DEGREE

Mean Difference (I-J)

Std. Error

Sig.

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound

Upper Bound

Bonferroni

LT HIGH SCHOOL

HIGH SCHOOL

-10.6923*

1.1432

.000

-13.904

-7.480

JUNIOR COLLEGE

-19.9879*

1.6560

.000

-24.640

-15.335

BACHELOR

-32.4796*

1.3119

.000

-36.166

-28.794

GRADUATE

-46.2190*

1.4764

.000

-50.367

-42.071

HIGH SCHOOL

LT HIGH SCHOOL

10.6923*

1.1432

.000

7.480

13.904

JUNIOR COLLEGE

-9.2956*

1.3924

.000

-13.208

-5.383

BACHELOR

-21.7874*

.9580

.000

-24.479

-19.096

GRADUATE

-35.5267*

1.1732

.000

-38.823

-32.230

JUNIOR COLLEGE

LT HIGH SCHOOL

19.9879*

1.6560

.000

15.335

24.640

HIGH SCHOOL

9.2956*

1.3924

.000

5.383

13.208

BACHELOR

-12.4918*

1.5340

.000

-16.802

-8.182

GRADUATE

-26.2311*

1.6768

.000

-30.942

-21.520

BACHELOR

LT HIGH SCHOOL

32.4796*

1.3119

.000

28.794

36.166

HIGH SCHOOL

21.7874*

.9580

.000

19.096

24.479

JUNIOR COLLEGE

12.4918*

1.5340

.000

8.182

16.802

GRADUATE

-13.7394*

1.3382

.000

-17.499

-9.980

GRADUATE

LT HIGH SCHOOL

46.2190*

1.4764

.000

42.071

50.367

HIGH SCHOOL

35.5267*

1.1732

.000

32.230

38.823

JUNIOR COLLEGE

26.2311*

1.6768

.000

21.520

30.942

BACHELOR

13.7394*

1.3382

.000

9.980

17.499

Games-Howell

LT HIGH SCHOOL

HIGH SCHOOL

-10.6923*

.9292

.000

-13.235

-8.149

JUNIOR COLLEGE

-19.9879*

1.6288

.000

-24.459

-15.517

BACHELOR

-32.4796*

1.2173

.000

-35.808

-29.151

GRADUATE

-46.2190*

1.2495

.000

-49.639

-42.799

HIGH SCHOOL

LT HIGH SCHOOL

10.6923*

.9292

.000

8.149

13.235

JUNIOR COLLEGE

-9.2956*

1.5125

.000

-13.455

-5.137

BACHELOR

-21.7874*

1.0566

.000

-24.677

-18.898

GRADUATE

-35.5267*

1.0936

.000

-38.523

-32.531

JUNIOR COLLEGE

LT HIGH SCHOOL

19.9879*

1.6288

.000

15.517

24.459

HIGH SCHOOL

9.2956*

1.5125

.000

5.137

13.455

BACHELOR

-12.4918*

1.7047

.000

-17.167

-7.817

GRADUATE

-26.2311*

1.7279

.000

-30.970

-21.492

BACHELOR

LT HIGH SCHOOL

32.4796*

1.2173

.000

29.151

35.808

HIGH SCHOOL

21.7874*

1.0566

.000

18.898

24.677

JUNIOR COLLEGE

12.4918*

1.7047

.000

7.817

17.167

GRADUATE

-13.7394*

1.3470

.000

-17.424

-10.055

GRADUATE

LT HIGH SCHOOL

46.2190*

1.2495

.000

42.799

49.639

HIGH SCHOOL

35.5267*

1.0936

.000

32.531

38.523

JUNIOR COLLEGE

26.2311*

1.7279

.000

21.492

30.970

BACHELOR

13.7394*

1.3470

.000

10.055

17.424

*. The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level.

Summary

In Week 6, I gained an understanding of how t tests can assist with determining whether differences exist between samples. The t test has significant utility in hypothesis testing, but its inherent weakness is that it cannot compare more than two groups in one test. As a social researcher, I often have multiple samples/groups to compare. For instance, I might want to test for differences in socioeconomic status across racial identity, determine which educational intervention has the greatest potential across different treatment groups, or determine whether there are differences in disease risk factors across levels of education attainment. These are all examples where you likely have three or more groups that I want to compare. To perform this task, we call upon the one-way ANOVA.

References:

Frankfort-Nachmias, C., & Leon-Guerrero, A. (2015). Social statistics for a diverse society (7th

ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Wagner, W. E. (2016). Using IBM® SPSS® statistics for research methods and social science

Statistics (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Walden University Library. (n.d.). Course Guide and Assignment Help for RSCH 8210.

Retrieved from http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/rsch8210

Datasets

Document: Data Set 2014 General Social Survey (dataset file)

Use this dataset to complete this week’s Discussion.

Note: You will need the SPSS software to open this dataset.

Document: Data Set Afrobarometer (dataset file)

Use this dataset to complete this week’s Assignment.

Note: You will need the SPSS software to open this dataset.

Document: High School Longitudinal Study 2009 Dataset (dataset file)

Use this dataset to complete this week’s Assignment.

Note: You will need the SPSS software to open this dataset.

Page 6 of 6