Health Insurance Expansion

CATEGORY

EXCELLENT – above expectations

GOOD – met expectations

FAIR – below expectations

POOR – significantly below expectations or missing

SCORE

Analysis of the rationale for health insurance expansion

(30 points possible)

The analysis shows depth and breadth in critical thinking when addressing the rationale for health insurance expansion, including how health insurance expansion relates to the problem of adverse selection.

(27–30 points)

The analysis fully addresses the key points related to the rationale for health insurance expansion, including how health insurance expansion relates to the problem of adverse selection.

(24–26 points)

The analysis lacks depth, breadth, or clarity in addressing the key points related to the rationale for health insurance expansion, including how health insurance expansion relates to the problem of adverse selection.

(21–23 points)

The analysis does not address (zero points) or poorly addresses key points related to the rationale for health insurance expansion, including how health insurance expansion relates to the problem of adverse selection.

(0–20 points)

Evaluation of economic implications of health insurance expansion in the U.S.

(30 points possible)

The evaluation shows critical thinking, considers divergent and competing opinions, and demonstrates creative problem solving in its evaluation of economic implications of health insurance expansion in the U.S., including how health insurance expansions might impact healthcare organizations in your own state or region.

(27–30 points)

The evaluation fully addresses economic implications of health insurance expansion in the U.S., including how health insurance expansions might impact healthcare organizations in your own state or region.

(24–26 points)

The evaluation lacks depth or clarity in addressing the economic implications of health insurance expansion in the U.S., including how health insurance expansions might impact healthcare organizations in your own state or region.

(21–23 points)

The evaluation does not address (zero points) or poorly addresses the economic implications of health insurance expansion in the U.S., including how health insurance expansions might impact healthcare organizations in your own state or region.

(0–20 points)

Writing

(15 points possible)

The paper is well organized, uses scholarly tone, contains original writing and proper paraphrasing, follows APA style, contains very few or no writing and/or spelling errors, and is fully consistent with graduate-level writing style.

(14–15 points)

The paper is mostly consistent with graduate-level writing style and may have some spelling, APA, and writing errors.

(12–13 points)

The paper is somewhat consistent with graduate-level writing style and may have some spelling, APA, and writing errors.

(10–11 points)

The paper is well below graduate-level writing style expectations for organization, scholarly tone, APA style, and writing, or shows heavy reliance on quoting.

(0–9 points)

Instructor comments:      

Total Score (75 possible points):

      points