|
|
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
|
2
Less than Satisfactory
65.00%
|
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
|
4
Good
85.00%
|
5
Excellent
100.00%
|
|
70.0 %Content
|
|
|
30.0 %Create an essay of 750 -1,000 words in length that does the following, 1. Briefly, and in your own words, describe each of the four theories discussed in Chapter 1 of the text.
|
Essay does not authentically describe each of the four theories discussed in Chapter 1 of the text
|
Essay authentically describes each of the four theories discussed in Chapter 1 of the text. The topic is skimmed over and is lacking depth of any kind. Demonstrates poor understanding of topic.
|
Essay authentically describes each of the four theories discussed in Chapter 1 of the text with some level of depth; explanation is limited and lacks some evidence to support claims. Demonstrates a minimal understanding of the topic.
|
Essay authentically describes each of the four theories discussed in Chapter 1 of the text with accurate details and evidence; explanation provides analysis with clear evidence to support claims.
|
Essay authentically describes each of the four theories discussed in Chapter 1 of the text with quality details and factual evidence; explanation is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. Demonstrates an exceptional understanding of topic.
|
|
|
40.0 %2. Think of an example (a situation or event that has to do with a marriage or a family) that has happened to you or someone you know fairly well and show how that situation or event could be explained and understood by one of these four theories.
|
Essay does not identify an event related to marriage.
|
Essay identifies an event related to marriage, but does not apply a sociological theory to explain the event. The topic is skimmed over and is lacking depth of any kind. Demonstrates poor understanding of topic.
|
Essay identifies an event related to marriage with some level of depth; explanation of how a sociological theory could explain the event is limited and lacks some evidence to support claims. Demonstrates a minimal understanding of the topic.
|
Essay identifies an event related to marriage; theory is delineated with accurate details and evidence; explanation of how the specific theory could explain the event provides analysis with clear evidence to support claims.
|
Essay identifies an event related to marriage; theory is delineated with quality details and factual evidence; explanation is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. Demonstrates an exceptional understanding of topic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
|
|
|
10.0 %Paragraph Development and Transitions
|
Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. No apparent connections between paragraphs are established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope. Organization is disjointed.
|
Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident.
|
Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other.
|
A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to purpose.
|
There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader. Paragraph structure is seamless.
|
|
|
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
|
|
|
10.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
|
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.
|
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.
|
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.
|
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.
|
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
|
|
|
10.0 %Format
|
|
|
5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
|
Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
|
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.
|
Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
|
Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
|
All format elements are correct.
|
|
|
5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)
|
Sources are not documented.
|
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
|
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
|
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
|
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
|
|