Statistics - Hypothesis Testing
Running head: TESTING HYPOTHESIS AND MEASURE OF ASSOCIATION
TESTING HYPOTHESIS AND MEASURE OF ASSOCIATION 5
Testing Hypothesis and Measure of Association
Academic Writing and Research Skills
D
2016
Testing Hypothesis and Measure of Association
Sample data-portion of the population
|
Performance before training |
Performance after training |
|
65 |
70 |
|
87 |
88 |
|
23 |
30 |
|
45 |
49 |
|
67 |
68 |
|
90 |
94 |
|
24 |
30 |
|
45 |
48 |
|
31 |
36 |
|
19 |
23 |
|
92 |
95 |
|
Average 53.45454545 |
57.36363636 |
|
|
|
1. Test a sample data above using t-test.
T-test is known to be the statistical analysis of mean of two populations (Taeger & Kuhnt, 2014). For instance, a two sample t-test is used to check whether the two given samples are different is basically used when the two normal distributions variances are not known and also when the small sample size is used in an experiment. Therefore, in our case we have used two sample data one ‘performance before training’ and other one ‘performance after training’
Results
2. Test a sample data above using ANOVA
Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) gives statistical test determining whether the means of various groups are equal or not (Lind, Marchal, & Wathen, 2005). Thus, it can be used to generalize the t-test of more than two groups. In addition, ANOVA are helpful since it help in testing (comparing) three or even more means (variables or groups) for the statistical significance. Furthermore, it is mostly utilized to test or determine what impact the independent variables have on the dependent variables in analysis of regression.
Results
3. Test a sample data above using CHI-SQUARE.
A chi-square is a statistical test that is used to compare the data that has been collected with the data expected (Lind, Marchal, & Wathen, 2005). If the chi-square result give large difference, between the expected and collected data, then this will derive a conclusion that there may something causing that significant change. In addition, having significant large differences will help one or permit one to avoid or reject the null hypotheses which shows or gives a conclusion that there is no relationship between two variables (Taeger & Kuhnt, 2014). Therefore, in our case since the significant difference is close to 1 that is, 0.863975804 then we conclude that training the employees have brought a significant change in business operations and performance.
Results
References Lind, D. A., Marchal, W. G., & Wathen, S. A. (2005). Statistical techniques in business & economics. Boston : McGraw-Hill Irwin. Taeger, D., & Kuhnt, S. (2014). Statistical hypthesisi testing with SAS and IR. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley.
t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Unequal Variances
Performance before trainingPerfomance after training
Mean53.4545454557.36363636
Variance789.2727273726.2545455
Observations1111
Hypothesized Mean Difference3.909090909
df20
t Test-0.666070548
P(T<=t) one-tail0.256488102
t Critical one-tail1.724718243
P(T<=t) two-tail0.512976204
t Critical two-tail2.085963447