Annotated Bibliography/Dr. Manahil

Annotated Bibliography

Student Name	Total Points Possible	Total Points Received	Late Work Percentage (select from drop down menu)	Late Work Deduction	Final Points Received
	100	0.00	0% Windows User: Windows User: Select dropdown menu for percentage deducted for late work.	0.00	0.00
Criterion	Superior Criteria (100%)	Excellent Criteria (95%)	Satisfactory Criteria (85%)	Marginal Criteria (75%)	Unsatisfactory Criteria (0%)	Points Possible	Evaluation (select from drop down menu)	Points Received	Faculty Feedback
Element 1: Annotated Bibliography	Student submits exemplary work as demonstrated by the originality, depth of analysis, and/or creativity when describing the essence of each entry and pertinent details about its content for his/her annotated bibliography. There are no errors in the content. Excellent detailed content is evident in the assignment with numerous, excellent connections to the topic.	Student submits excellent quality work as demonstrated by the depth of details evident in the entries and about its content for his/her annotated bibliography. There are one or two minor errors in the content. The assignment makes good connections to the topic.	Student submits a good annotated bibliography but it lacks some details. There are some errors in the content and/or the entries lack connections to the topic. The assignment directions are met; however, the assignment lacks in depth of content.	Student submits an annotated bibliography that does not fully address the directions and is missing a lot of pertinent content. There are many errors and the content lacks clarity and depth.	Does not meet minimal standards.	50	0% Windows User: Windows User: Select drop down menu for inputting grade for this criterion.	0
Element 2: Critical Thinking	Student's annotated bibliography critically analyzes the content for strengths and weaknesses as related to the scope of the resource, the purpose and philosophical approach, the underlying assumptions, the methodology if applicable, and any evident limitations and opportunities for further inquiry.	Student's annotated bibliography critically analyzes most of the content for strengths and weaknesses as related to the scope of the resource, the purpose and philosophical approach, the underlying assumptions, the methodology if applicable, and any evident limitations and opportunities for further inquiry. There are one or two minor errors in the logic and/or critical thinking applied to the assignment.	Student's annotated bibliography critically analyzes most of the content for strengths and weaknesses as related to most of the following: the scope of the resource, the purpose and philosophical approach, the underlying assumptions, the methodology if applicable, and/or any evident limitations and opportunities for further inquiry.	Student's annotated bibliography demonstrates a weak analysis of the content and loosely addresses some of the following: the scope of the resource, the purpose and philosophical approach, the underlying assumptions, the methodology if applicable, and any evident limitations and opportunities for further inquiry.	Does not meet minimal standards.	20	0% Windows User: Windows User: Select drop down menu for inputting grade for this criterion.		Windows User: Windows User: Faculty Feedback - input comments for the student related to this criterion.	0
Element 3: Grammar, Usage, and Mechanics	Student consistently uses scholarly tone, uses original writing and proper paraphrasing, has no writing or spelling errors, and writing is fully consistent with basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style. There are no errors in grammar, usage, or mechanics in the writing.	Student consistently uses scholarly tone, uses original writing and proper paraphrasing, has no writing or spelling errors, and writing is fully consistent with basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style. There are one or two minor errors in grammar, usage, or mechanics in the writing.	Student uses good scholarly tone and original writing and proper paraphrasing; however writing has some errors in grammar, usage, or mechanics, but they do not distract the reader.	Student does not use good scholarly tone and/or may demonstrate heavy reliance on quoting versus original writing and paraphrasing. There are several errors in grammar, usage, or mechanics that distract the reader.	Does not meet minimal standards.	15	0% Windows User: Windows User: Select drop down menu for inputting grade for this criterion.		Windows User: Windows User: Faculty Feedback - input comments for the student related to this criterion.	0
Element 4: APA Formatting and Style	Student demonstrates full adherence to APA style and reference requirements. There are no errors in APA formatting and style.	Student demonstrates full adherence to APA style and reference requirements. There are one or two minor errors in APA style or format.	Student mostly adheres to APA style and reference requirements. Most citations are referenced correctly and aligned with APA format. There may be several different errors and/or one consistent error throughout paper.	Student demonstrates weak and/or inconsistent adherence to APA style and reference requirements. There are numerous errors in APA format and/or style that distract the reader and make the writing difficult to read and/or a missing Reference page.	Does not meet minimal standards.	15	0% Windows User: Windows User: Select drop down menu for inputting grade for this criterion.		Windows User: Windows User: Faculty Feedback - input comments for the student related to this criterion.	0
Windows User: Windows User: Faculty Feedback - input comments for the student related to this criterion.	Windows User: Windows User: Enter student name.			Windows User: Windows User: Select dropdown menu for percentage deducted for late work.

DIRECTIONS FOR STUDENT: As part of your Doctoral Seminar for this set of weeks, you are participating in a seminar-style discussion about the weekly topics. You will be asked to address five of the required resources and at least five additional resources from the Walden Library and to incorporate them into your posting. As a related exercise, submit an annotated bibliography of the 10 resources you will refer to this week. For each entry, be sure to address the following as a minimum: A) Include the full APA citation. B) Discuss the scope of the resource. C) Discuss the purpose and philosophical approach. D) Discuss the underlying assumptions. E) If referring to a research reporting article, present the methodology. F) Relate the resource to the body of resources you have consulted in this course. G) Discuss any evident limitations and opportunities for further inquiry. DIRECTIONS FOR FACULTY: 1) Enter student name. 2) When appropriate, select Late Work Percentage and enter percent using drop down menu. 3) Use the drop down menu for each criterion in the Evaluation box (column H) to grade assignment. 4) Enter student feedback in the Faculty Feedback box as needed (column J).

APA Manual (6th edition): Chapter 3 - Writing Clearly and Concisely; Chapter 4 - The Mechanics of Style; Chapter 5 - Displaying Results; Chapter 6 - Crediting Sources; Chapter 7 - Reference Examples © 2016 Laureate Education, Inc.