Research

profilegreeneyes
appendix_c.docx_instruction.docx

Appendix C

Criteria of evaluation of health reform

CRITERIA

*4

3

2

1

0

Comments

I. introduction description of topic / subject selected with relationship to the situation current in the services of health.

Discussion of the methodology of work to develop the theme.

II. conceptual framework of evaluation use literature to support the approach selected for evaluation.

Provides the frame concept.

III. main findings of the analysis and interpretation of data collected by the group what is the current situation? What are the main features of the health system of the State of Florida or U.S.

What problems are there, according to the perception of different interest groups?

Previous studies with conclusive and irrefutable information? What are its main findings and conclusions?

There are significant differences between different approaches to participating insurers? It varies markedly rules and procedures and the indicators of performance of the existing approaches? What are the differences in covers and costs of private and Government health insurance plans?

¿ What options there are for them people not insured that does not qualify for the Plan of health of the Government and not can pay a Plan private?

What is the satisfaction of the various providers and consumers, with the current system?

¿ How effective have the solutions tested in the past been?

¿ What are the main weaknesses of the current system?

¿ What are the key strengths that we want to keep?

How does it compare the situation of the health system of the State of Florida or the nation with that of other countries?

INSTRUCTION FOR PUBLIC HEALTH POLICIE, ETHIC AND SYSTEMS. 5 pages.

N

URS 501 Public Health Policies, Ethics and Systems 4

Prepared: 11/15/2012

Prepared: 11/15/2012

Prepared: 11/15/2012

N

URS 501 Public Health Policies, Ethics and Systems 93

Criteria

*4

3

2

1

O

N/A

Comments

¿ What conclusions can we arrive on the effects of the current health system? What results in the health of the population and of the performance of the system of health allow conclude on the need of change?

¿ There is consensus in key areas to improve? Could one achieve consensus and commitment to the recommendations of the Group?

IV. determination of opportunities, challenges, strengths and weaknesses, in the light of the strategic situational analysis describes the contribution opportunity.

Identifica los retos.

Describes the strengths and weaknesses

Provides recommendations specific about the role and contribution that it can make nursing practice advanced professional.

V. includes proposed change, conclusions and recommendations of the Group and how can the situation be improved? How improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the system of health today?

What objectives we want to achieve?

Do you what features of the current system contribute to the achievement of the proposed objectives? What approaches, programs or projects are can continue, what is can expand or what is can delete?

Adjustments required do in the design of the system to achieve the proposed objectives?

¿ Key principles of regionalization may incorporate the new design

VI. style used guides established by APA to present the work.