geography paper help, 3 pages!

profilextjiaoizs96
15-nov2.pdf

In the anthropogenic biome (“anthromes”) framework, ecosystem processes are considered to be mainly functions of: 1. Temperature and precipitation 2. Biodiversity and biomass 3. Net primary productivity (NPP) and carbon storage 4. Population density and land use

Today • Turn in section exercise if you have not already.

• Finish lecture and discussion on anthromes • Succession and disturbance

• Friday: Results from your mid-quarter feedback on the course

Section recap: Ecosystem services

• The benefits humans derive from ecosystems.  Provisioning of water, food, raw materials, medicines, etc.  Processes like carbon sequestration, purification of air and water  Non-material benefits like spiritual value, recreational experiences,

cognitive development

• What do you think are some of the advantages and

problems associated with the economic valuation of ecosystem services?

Anthropogenic Biomes Globally

People: 80% live in urban and village anthromes Land: 23% Wildlands, 77% Anthropogenic Biomes NPP: 11% Wildlands, 89% Anthropogenic Biomes NPP of “wild” forests is LESS than NPP of densely populated anthromes!

40% Used Lands

37% Novel Ecosystems

23% “Wild”

According to research on anthropogenic biomes, the biosphere we have is:

Mixed Settlements Massachusetts, USA

The old biosphere story… “Natural ecosystems with humans disturbing them”.

A new story… “Human systems, with natural

ecosystems embedded within them”.

How might anthromes change the way people think about nature? Do you buy the idea that biomes are no longer an adequate

classification scheme?

The authors of research on anthropogenic biomes (Erle Ellis et al.) tell ecologists to “go home.” What do you think they mean

by this?

Should scientists and conservations focus their attention more on peopled landscapes or wild

landscapes?

What do anthromes and ecosystem services have in common?

How ecosystems cHange: Disturbance & succession

Short-term physical or biological event that significantly alters ecosystems

Disturbance

A series of changes in species composition over time, following a disturbance event.

succession

Muir Glacier, 1941

A previously lifeless surface is colonized by life.

Primary succession

Muir Glacier, 1941

Example: Glacier Bay, Alaska

Primary succession

Muir Glacier, 1950

Muir Glacier, 1941

Example: Glacier Bay, Alaska

Primary succession

Muir Glacier, 1950 Muir Glacier, 2001

Primary succession

Example: Volcanic eruptions

Pioneer species & their characteristics

seconDary succession Ecosystem changes after a disturbance that leaves soils intact; surface of earth has not been stripped bare.

Example: Clear-cutting

Example: Downed trees

Microclimate

Scientists used to understand succession to be a linear process, with highly predictable stages that an ecosystem goes through over time.

Pioneer species

climax community A stable plant community* that is the end result of succession. Will not change without disturbance.

* What exact form this ideal community takes will depend on location and climate

A controlled burn in a juniper-sagebrush ecosystem in central Oregon

Yellowstone National Park forest regeneration after 1988 wildfires

Newer way of thinking: Succession and the adaptive cycle of complex systems

 Communities do not gravitate toward a single equilibrium state

 “Non-equilibrium ecology” (1990s to today)

Disturbance as an inevitable part of the system

“The only constant is change.” - Heraclitus

Still, an ecosystem can be thrown off it’s trajectory:

How do trees “communicate” and “interact” with one another? And how might these ideas impact how we think about succession?

Implications  Should competition be de-

emphasized in understanding succession?

 Mixed age stands might be more resilient in the face of disturbance and climate change. (Why?)

 Need for conservation of mycorrhizal fungi!

  • Slide Number 1
  • Today
  • Section recap: Ecosystem services
  • Anthropogenic Biomes Globally
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • The authors of research on anthropogenic biomes (Erle Ellis et al.) tell ecologists to “go home.” What do you think they mean by this?��Should scientists and conservations focus their attention more on peopled landscapes or wild landscapes?
  • What do anthromes and ecosystem services have in common?
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31