|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Introduction
|
Level 5
|
Level 4
|
Level 3
|
Level 2
|
Level 1
|
|
Purpose / Goals and Objectives
|
10 points
Expertly defines goals and objectives
|
8 points
identifies goals and objectives in a manner that reflects a general understanding of overall effort
|
6 points
identifies goals and objectives in a manner that reflects a basic understanding of overall effort
|
3 points
identifies goals and objectives in a manner where some aspects are missing or incomplete. (Or, inappropriate or excessive copying from other authors' work.)
|
0 points
does not identify goals and objectives in a manner that reflects a general understanding of overall effort.
|
|
Scope of Security Issues
|
10 points
Clearly describes and relates information security and other technology issues. Synthesizes and applies material and document relationships.
|
8 points
Basically describes and relates information security and other technology issues. Synthesizes and applies some material and document relationships.
|
6 points
Weakly describes and relates information security and other technology issues. Some synthesizing and application or applies material and document relationships.
|
3 points
Little description and relating information security and other technology issues. Little synthesizing or application of material and document relationships. (Or, inappropriate or excessive copying from other authors' work.)
|
0 points
No description or relationship of information security or other technology issues. Doesn’t synthesize or apply material and document relationships.
|
|
Project Expenses
|
Level 5
|
Level 4
|
Level 3
|
Level 2
|
Level 1
|
|
Costs Related to Security Effort/Solution Comment by Ajayi, Oluwatobi (IHS/HQ) [C]: Please explain more on this area. It requires more information. Thanks. Remember on the second to the last one you wrote, this was his comment “I thought the solution and the risk section needed more work. I just thought those two areas needed more information around it” so please explain well in details.
|
5 points
Clearly identifies and articulates the cost of overall security solution.
|
4 points
Basically identifies and articulates the cost of overall security solution.
|
2 points
Weakly identifies and articulates the cost of overall security solution.
|
1 point
Little identification or articulation of the costs regarding technology solution. May not link any costs to technologies identified. (Or, inappropriate or excessive copying from other authors' work.)
|
0 points
No identification or articulation of the costs regarding technology solution. No link of any costs to technologies identified.
|
|
SDLC Schedule Comment by Ajayi, Oluwatobi (IHS/HQ) [C]: Please explain more on this area. It requires more information. Thanks. Remember on the second to the last one you wrote, this was his comment “I thought the solution and the risk section needed more work. I just thought those two areas needed more information around it” so please explain well in details.
|
10 points
Synthesizes and applies logical SDLC processes and schedule to overall solution deployment.
|
8 points
Basically Synthesizes and applies logical SDLC processes and schedule to overall solution deployment.
|
6 points
Weakly Synthesizes and applies logical SDLC processes and schedule to overall solution deployment.
|
3 points
Little synthesis or application of logical SDLC processes and schedule to overall solution deployment. (Or, inappropriate or excessive copying from other authors' work.)
|
0 points
No synthesis or application of logical SDLC processes and schedule to overall solution deployment.
|
|
Solution Diagram and Illustration
|
Level 5
|
Level 4
|
Level 3
|
Level 2
|
Level 1
|
|
Use of Network diagram and illustrations Comment by Ajayi, Oluwatobi (IHS/HQ) [C]: I Think it will require you use the network diagram from the previous work based on what this rubric is saying. Thanks
|
10 points
Network diagram and accompanying illustration are strongly linked to proposed solution and content
|
8 points
Network diagram and accompanying illustration are generally linked to proposed solution and content
|
6 points
Network diagram and accompanying illustration are weakly linked to proposed solution and content
|
3 points
Network diagram and accompanying illustration are haphazardly linked to proposed solution and content. (Or, inappropriate or excessive copying from other authors' work.)
|
0 points
Network diagram and accompanying illustration are not linked to proposed solution and content
|
|
Security Strategy
|
Level 5
|
Level 4
|
Level 3
|
Level 2
|
Level 1
|
|
Milestones
|
5 points
Each defined milestone is directly related to overall strategy/solution and clearly mitigates the risk or issue.
|
4 points
Most milestones are related to overall strategy/solution and clearly mitigates the risk or issue.
|
2 points
Milestones are weakly related to overall strategy/solution and clearly mitigates the risk or issue.
|
1 point
Milestone are haphazardly related to overall strategy/solution and clearly mitigates the risk or issue. (Or, inappropriate or excessive copying from other authors' work.)
|
1 point
No milestones are directly related to overall strategy/solution and clearly mitigates the risk or issue.
|
|
Assumptions
|
10 points
Clearly identifies security solutions and assumptions that consist of people, processes and technologies that relate to the risks. Covers all three requirements.
|
8 points
Basically identifies security solutions and assumptions that consist of people, processes and technologies that relate to the risks. Covers at least two of the three requirements.
|
6 points
Weakly identifies security solutions and assumptions that consist of people, processes and technologies that relate to the risks. Covers at least one of the requirements.
|
3 points
Little identification of security solutions and assumptions that consist of people, processes or technologies that relate to the risks. May not cover one of the requirements. (Or, inappropriate or excessive copying from other authors' work.)
|
0 points
Doesn’t identify security solutions or assumptions that consist of people, processes or technologies that relate to the risks. Doesn’t cover any of the three requirements.
|
|
Constraints
|
5 points
Clearly describes the linkage and constraints associated with solution
|
4 points
Basically describes the linkage and constraints associated with solution
|
2 points
Weakly describes the linkage and constraints associated with solution
|
1 point
Little description of the linkage and constraints associated with solution. (Or, inappropriate or excessive copying from other authors' work.)
|
0 points
No description of any linkage or constraints associated with solution
|
|
Timeline
|
Level 5
|
Level 4
|
Level 3
|
Level 2
|
Level 1
|
|
SDLC Tasks
|
5 points
Clear and detailed SDLC tasks that logically leads to the proposed solutions
|
4 points
Basic SDLC tasks are provided that generally lead or infer how the proposed solution will be realized
|
2 points
Weak and poorly detailed SDLC tasks are provided that minimally lead or infer how the proposed solution will be realized
|
1 point
Haphazard and poorly detailed SDLC tasks that minimally lead or infer how the proposed solution will be realized. (Or, inappropriate or excessive copying from other authors' work.)
|
0 points
No SDLC tasks are provided that lead or infer how the proposed solution will be realized
No clear and defined tasks for each solution.
|
|
Prioritize Tasks Comment by Ajayi, Oluwatobi (IHS/HQ) [C]: I didn’t see this part explained on the paper. Looks missing. And if you feel is there please explain more. Faith please am saying all this just in order for the grade not to reduce. I want to make sure we cover every aspect of the work before turning it in. Thanks so much for help.
|
5 points
Major tasks are clearly prioritized according their importance to mitigating the risks and issues found.
|
4 points
Major tasks basically prioritized according their importance to mitigating the risks or issues found.
|
2 points
Major tasks weakly prioritized according their importance to mitigating the risks and issues found.
|
1 point
Few tasks prioritized according their importance to mitigating the risks or issues found. (Or, inappropriate or excessive copying from other authors' work.)
|
0 points
No tasks prioritized according their importance to mitigating the risks or issues found.
|
|
Define Resources
|
5 points
Clearly defined people resources (by type) that support each task in the timeline.
|
4 points
Basically defined people resources (by type) that support each task in the timeline.
|
2 points
Weakly defined people resources (by type) that support each task in the timeline.
|
1 point
Little defined people resources (by type) that support each task in the timeline. (Or, inappropriate or excessive copying from other authors' work.)
|
0 points
No defined people resources (by type) that support each task in the timeline.
|
|
Finds and Applies Knowledge
|
Level 5
|
Level 4
|
Level 3
|
Level 2
|
Level 1
|
|
Use of Authoritative Sources
|
5 points
Used at least 5 authoritative or scholarly sources in paper. No APA style errors in sources.
|
4 points
Used at least 3 authoritative or scholarly sources in paper. No more than 1 APA errors in sources.
|
3 points
Used at least 2 authoritative or scholarly sources in paper. No more than 2 APA errors in sources.
|
1 point
May have used 1 authoritative or scholarly source in paper. May not have used APA style formatting.
|
0 points
No authoritative or scholarly sources used in paper.
|
|
Citation of Sources
|
5 points
All sources cited. No errors in citing material in paper.
|
4 points
All but 1 source cited. Had no more than 5 citing errors in paper.
|
2 points
All but 2 sources cited. Had no more than 10 citing errors in paper.
|
1 point
All but 3 sources cited. Had less than 15 APA citing errors in paper.
|
0 points
No sources cited or had more than 15 APA citing errors in paper.
|
|
Organization, Execution and Appearance
|
Level 5
|
Level 4
|
Level 3
|
Level 2
|
Level 1
|
|
Formatting
|
5 points
Prepared MS Word document, used consistent formatting, section subheadings, submitted one file, used instructor provided template, correct coversheet and separate reference page and meets minimum page count of 5 pages.
|
4 points
MS Word document didn’t follow up to two (2) of the following: used consistent formatting, section subheadings, submitted one file, used instructor provided template, correct coversheet and separate reference page and meets minimum page count of 5 pages.
|
2 points
MS Word document didn’t follow up to four (4) of the following: used consistent formatting, section subheadings, submitted one file, used instructor provided template, correct coversheet and separate reference page and meets minimum page count of 5 pages.
|
1 point
MS Word document followed only one (1) of the following: used consistent formatting, section subheadings, submitted one file, used instructor provided template, correct coversheet and separate reference page and meets minimum page count of 5 pages.
|
0 points
Non MS Word document didn’t any of the following: used consistent formatting, section subheadings, submitted one file, used instructor provided template, correct coversheet and separate reference page and meets minimum page count of 5 pages.
|
|
Grammar and Punctuation
|
5 points
No grammar errors, use of first/second person, spelling or punctuation errors.
|
4 points
Less than 5 grammar errors, use of first/second person, spelling or punctuation errors.
|
2 points
Less than 10 grammar errors, use of first/second person, spelling or punctuation errors.
|
1 point
Less than 15 grammar errors, use of first/second person, spelling or punctuation errors.
|
0 points
More than 15 grammar errors, use of first/second person, spelling or punctuation errors.
|
|
Overall Score
|
Level 5
4 or more
|
Level 4
3 or more
|
Level 3
2 or more
|
Level 2
1 or more
|
Level 1
0 or more
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John_matt
rubric_with_mods.docx
0
